BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Given the setup yes it should. If that run showed trough going negative in Alabama with no high anchored in to the north and then a coastal lp off of NC then that would make no sense. It's not about what's typical or atypical the weather pattern at hand dictates where it's going to go. If you want to wish-cast and just ignore the setup and call it atypical then that's your prerogative I guess. Everyone is right and wrong in different places. People just have different perceptions. Nothing is one/two dimensional in the atmosphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball0618 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Everything the GFS spits out is atypical. lol Again I am not saying what it shows will be the end result either, because nobody knows. If you want snow you want that low to be weaker as it meanders through the south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 GEFS mean: At 114 is 1009mb in C SC... 120 is 1006mb in C NC... 126 is 1002mb over Ocean City... 132 is 998mb over NYC Going to be fun to see the individs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitualOfTheTrout Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I see your point. But isn't that zone usually along or off the coast? I think that is what Ian was getting at, that zone usually is somewhere else, typically closer to the coast when a storm is coming up east of the Apps or to the west of them, rarely right up the spine but given the right variables there is nothing saying its impossible for it to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Ukie is another thump with slp over the Bay, but the 72 hr precip gives you a good idea that there will be a good bit of overrunning precip ahead of the main show. http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=ukmet&stn=PNMPR&comp=1&run2=12&mod2=ukmet&stn2=PNMPR&hh2=060&fixhh=1&stn2_type=prog&mode=latest&yyyy=latest&mm=latest&dd=latest&hh=072 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not a common low pressure track on the gfs, IMO. Can't recall seeing too many of those. It's actually a great track for us with some HP in a decent spot. Nice rain storm on the GFS though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needbiggerboat Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 This may be for banter, but forget PDIII. This could be more like VDII 9 years later. If there's one thing about VD, its persistence. Took me a long time to recover from that one. Would rather have an in and out event, no lingering effects. Not as wet and warm as the 12z GFS. Something that leaves the white stuff, and it's fine if it's messy as long as is can be cleaned up easy. Other models may be better looking and create some arousal of interest. Will certainly be a long and hard few days ahead. Might be able to come from behind and have a nice climax if that Euro model is flexible with p-type and keeps the track stiff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxdude64 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Ao trending pos, pna trending neg, pos nao, HP east of Newfoundland, no blocking, no 50/50 low. The teleconnections are lousy. Dont get hopes up too high in the big cities and you will be fine. Front end thump thanks to frigid antecedent airmass but quickly (relatively speaking) over to rain for many. Maybe this is our sacrificial period where the pattern relaxes because most signs point to more cold and DRYNESS after the moderation next week. Hang in.....winter isnt over just yet imo. FYP, and yes, sadly THAT would be and is typical..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Ukie is another thump with slp over the Bay, but the 72 hr precip gives you a good idea that there will be a good bit of overrunning precip ahead of the main show. http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=ukmet&stn=PNMPR&comp=1&run2=12&mod2=ukmet&stn2=PNMPR&hh2=060&fixhh=1&stn2_type=prog&mode=latest&yyyy=latest&mm=latest&dd=latest&hh=072 That's something that was absent on the GFS run. The light snow early monday was from the lead vort. Euro and para euro both have a nice front running slug. Nice to see the Ukie keeping up that theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's actually a great track for us with some HP in a decent spot. Nice rain storm on the GFS though. yea if that high was 12 hours slower and tracking across Montreal instead of the Mason dixon line we would be getting crushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoast NPZ Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Either e3, e15, or e18 on the heels of tuesday's debacle would send me completely over the edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 If there's one thing about VD, its persistence. Took me a long time to recover from that one. Would rather have an in and out event, no lingering effects. Not as wet and warm as the 12z GFS. Something that leaves the white stuff, and it's fine if it's messy as long as is can be cleaned up easy. Other models may be better looking and create some arousal of interest. Will certainly be a long and hard few days ahead. Might be able to come from behind and have a nice climax if that Euro model is flexible with p-type and keeps the track stiff. Someone please hack the wiki page and remove the b word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxdude64 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Either e3, e15, or e18 on the heels of tuesday's debacle would send me completely over the edge. I thought of you as soon as I saw e3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Let me rephrase where I was trying to go with this. "Typical" tracks are all relative to the pattern at hand and to call that track the GFS portrays atypical given the pattern is wrong. Ok. I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'm usually pretty honest with myself about what is going to happen. Two days ago, I knew for an absolute certainty that I wasn't getting snow regardless of my forecast. On this one, I was just pointing out that I don't see it happening like the gfs was showing. Not that it can't happen, it just doesn't seem to be a winter storm track we see here. My comment wasnt based on what I want. Even if it does happen differently, that still doesn't mean we end up with a better result. Lots of ways to get screwed here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 gefs_snow_ens_washdc_23.png eps was very similar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think that is what Ian was getting at, that zone usually is somewhere else, typically closer to the coast when a storm is coming up east of the Apps or to the west of them, rarely right up the spine but given the right variables there is nothing saying its impossible for it to happen. Yeah, and that's what I was saying. The piedmont is not usually the winter track. And yeah, anything is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoast NPZ Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I thought of you as soon as I saw e3 Let's hope for e13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 gefs_snow_ens_washdc_23.png That mean snow is the highest of the past 5 runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's actually a great track for us with some HP in a decent spot. Nice rain storm on the GFS though. Correct. That's why I know we rarely see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 gefs_snow_ens_washdc_23.png Isn't that all forms of ice because of the not so great algorithm that they use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxdude64 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Let's hope for e13. I'd be thrilled with the eC, everyone is yelling cold lock, but I remember a 6 degree morning within last 3 winters that had rain falling at 4 pm at 34 degrees. It CAN scour out quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Ok. I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'm usually pretty honest with myself about what is going to happen. Two days ago, I knew for an absolute certainty that I wasn't getting snow regardless of my forecast. On this one, I was just pointing out that I don't see it happening like the gfs was showing. Not that it can't happen, it just doesn't seem to be a winter storm track we see here. My comment wasnt based on what I want. Even if it does happen differently, that still doesn't mean we end up with a better result. Lots of ways to get screwed here. Lol, less than here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Isn't that all forms of ice because of the not so great algorithm that they use? It looks like Wxbell has greatly improved the algo this year. Not seeing the big disconnects when you look at different panels that clearly argue against any snow. With that being said, the .5 degree grid spacing with the gefs members and an event with razor sharp ptype gradients doesn't give me much confidence in the ind member solutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It looks like Wxbell has greatly improved the algo this year. Not seeing the big disconnects when you look at different panels that clearly argue against any snow. With that being said, the .5 degree grid spacing with the gefs members and an event with razor sharp ptype gradients doesn't give me much confidence in the ind member solutions. What types of systems are individual members good for? That's something I have not really dug into before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I see your point. But isn't that zone usually along or off the coast? Yes, fairly often in the winter it is near the coast. But given the setup it makes sense it would back toward the Blue Ridge or so at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball0618 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Ok. I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'm usually pretty honest with myself about what is going to happen. Two days ago, I knew for an absolute certainty that I wasn't getting snow regardless of my forecast. On this one, I was just pointing out that I don't see it happening like the gfs was showing. Not that it can't happen, it just doesn't seem to be a winter storm track we see here. My comment wasnt based on what I want. Even if it does happen differently, that still doesn't mean we end up with a better result. Lots of ways to get screwed here. No problem I didn't initially portray my sentiments the right way either. My bad and yes there are many more ways to end up wet rather than white in this particular occasion. Front end thump seems very plausible, but to what extent and then if this storm winds up it's curtains for most east of the apps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 What types of systems are individual members good for? That's something I have not really dug into before. Ones where ptype isn't a glaring concern. The lower resoluton with the GEFS can play tricks on you. Euro ens have twice the resolution right now and are going even higher next month if they verify better than the current. Maps like these from the GEFS are telling irt resolution issues with ptype problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Either e3, e15, or e18 on the heels of tuesday's debacle would send me completely over the edge. e15 ends up good, but later. That one could just be a very much delayed storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 e15 ends up good, but later. That one could just be a very much delayed storm. or could be the system digging behind it. Seems the cutter solutions also force that more south behind it and some give us something from that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.