Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 thanks Ian. Very similar if you just look at the eastern us but globally some big differences as you pointed out. We have a better starting airmass though so perhaps that offsets the worse north atlantic yeah it's not a bad match around here. probably one of the closer ones.. the air mass before that one was a lot less impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDIII Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 yuck... and for it to be that cold for the few days leading up to it is kinda heartbreaking! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's ugly..probably worst GFS run yet. Looks kinda like the 12z Euro yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surface almost 10C at hour 123 in DC. Let's hope the Euro keeps it's eggs in the first wave basket I guess. Yup, even far western burbs are toast on this run. Hell, Central PA is rain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaWarrior2 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's a disaster up and down the East Coast, goes to Rain for Northern New England even. We even get dry slotted. Hits 50 in Southern Maine. Well at least maybe the whole East Coast would be cliff jumping at once. 1"+ of rain for Bangor, ME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Well, at this point, we all gotta hope that the models are eroding the airmass too quickly or some weenie-jujitsu we can rely on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yup, even far western burbs are toast on this run. Hell, Central PA is rain Congrats Montreal. Pretty huge difference between the GFS and it's cousin with the evolution. I don't have access but is the GFS closer to the parallel Euro idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not a common low pressure track on the gfs, IMO. Can't recall seeing too many of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderdog Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 The LP takes a different track this time. That helps to erode the cold air quicker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball0618 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not a common low pressure track on the gfs, IMO. Can't recall seeing too many of those. there is no such thing as a common track. synoptically with a departing high that track makes a ton of sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not a common low pressure track on the gfs, IMO. Can't recall seeing too many of those. Or we forget them because they are lame. Makes sense synoptically given the low heights lakes and north and high heights east of New England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Stick a fork in this winter. You serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nflwxman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Stick a fork in this winter. Because of a 115 hr GFS operational prog? I'm really confused why all ensemble or more skilled guidance like the para euro is being ignored for a model that runs 4 times a day. Of course it's going to show multiple solutions. The GFS was showing Richmond getting to 38 degrees during 1/22/16 at this range; They made it to 28 just as the precipitation ended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Or we forget them because they are lame. Makes sense synoptically given the low heights lakes and north and high heights east of New England. I'm sure it happens, but usually I'd think we'd see it cut straight up west of the apps or stay a bit more south until it was further east. I could be convinced otherwise if someone can give me another example this winter of a low with that track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'm sure it happens, but usually I'd think we'd see it cut straight up west of the apps or stay a bit more south until it was further east. I could be convinced otherwise if someone can give me another example this winter of a low with that track. We just started getting coastals like a week before the blizzard so I don't think there's been one this winter. I know I've seen that type of track since I've been here but I can't really recall the specific storms. Probably because they weren't that memorable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 You serious? Not looking good. Seems like our winter happened Jan 22-23. That sometimes happens in these strong El Niño years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 12z is a straight up disaster. At least we get an inch early mon morning. What's that Saturday qpf showing up? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's only one model run but the setup is not terribly favorable with cold air retreating and the high not in a great position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 wrap around I see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not looking good. Seems like our winter happened Jan 22-23. That sometimes happens in these strong El Niño years. Based on a single model run though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Not looking good. Seems like our winter happened Jan 22-23. That sometimes happens in these strong El Niño years. I'd say there's a reasonable chance we're "in trouble" soon. But we've got 4 weeks of OK climo to go before really falling off a cliff. Plus 1958! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midatlanticweather Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 GEFS will be important! I was ready to throw in the towel yesterday at this time, Then we had multiple models smack me in the face! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 We just started getting coastals like a week before the blizzard so I don't think there's been one this winter. I know I've seen that type of track since I've been here but I can't really recall the specific storms. Probably because they weren't that memorable. No doubt. I just don't think its a very common one for our area. I hear the term Apps runner all the time, but we almost never see those either. I don't think there's cause for alarm because of this run. The gfs and euro ens are probably gonna lead the way at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Based on a single model run though? Not based on one model run but based on the evolution of the whole season. It seems like more times than not we are chasing conditions favorable for snow...IE it's too warm and need dynamic or evaporative cooling, track not good, cold air residence time off, no blocking etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Curse you ncep servers! I really don't know what happened to them this year. They are awful and for all the taxes paid, they should update at a reasonable pace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball0618 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 So protective....maybe he actually likes this forum and enjoys reading what you all write and isn't here to boast or brag. I use another forum for my local weather chatter, but come here on occasion just to read thoughts and such. However, to make a comment that there is a "typical" LP track is asinine. Would he make that comment if the LP tracked to Jacksonville and due north delivering snow to his backyard? No. but since the track the GFS portrays isn't snowy therefore it's atypical? It's weenieism at it's finest. All LP tracks are driven by the weather pattern and the overall synoptics involved at that time. I am not syaing this will be the ultimate outcome but to call the track atypical is flawed logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 12z GGEM: 108 -- 1006 MSLP in SE MS 120 -- 997 MSLP SW SC/NW GA 144 -- 984 MSLP SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 We just started getting coastals like a week before the blizzard so I don't think there's been one this winter. I know I've seen that type of track since I've been here but I can't really recall the specific storms. Probably because they weren't that memorable. And to clarify a little further, based on your comment about the coastals, it seems to me that we had an event either in Dec or early Jan where we had a low come up from central Ga and the Carolinas, good track but too warm. One of the gfs models was showing that same sort of thing yesterday. My issue with this low track is that it's basically a left hook toward the north once it hits the SC upstate. It had basically come due east for the prior 12 hours. Just don't think I've seen a lot of em do that lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nflwxman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 12z GGEM: 108 -- 1006 MSLP in SE MS 120 -- 997 MSLP SW SC/NW GA 144 -- 984 MSLP SNE Might be a decent track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Might be a decent track. Will see in a few min on meteocentre... want to see where 132 is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.