Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surface 0c goes way west at 132 It's mostly over by then though. And I would guess temps still in the 30's with a low track like that. I not going to dissect much other than it was a big favorable shift from 0z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Obviously, we would do better if reality is for the lead wave to develop since there is less cold air erosion (keeping with the sooner the better theory.) or get the lead wave to delay the development until it's far enough east not to matter. That is kind of what the 0z op euro did. The low does run the coast due north but far enough east to spare us the deluge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I-81 corridor won't like the para GFS run... looks like 0.5-0.6 QPF in metro DC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why do we keep talking about the DGEX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why do we keep talking about the DGEX? Because it shows what we want of course. I didn't look at it though. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 What's our precipitation before the flip on the 6z para? Much less between blue .5 and 1" versus 1.5" to 3" purples from 0Z. Western areas are shafted eta: Did 0Z pop 4" qpf...gee-wiz! 6Z 0Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Maybe he's looking at a different layer? No, I was looking at the 2m surface layer... everything else is good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why are those ewall maps so anti-user-friendly!? old interface that hasn't been updated ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I-81 corridor won't like the para GFS run... looks like 0.5-0.6 QPF in metro DC Yeah, no sh*t....lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why do we keep talking about the DGEX? because of this! http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/12394-feb-5-6-2010-snowmageddon/?p=426140 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Why do we keep talking about the DGEX? Because it gives us the most snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It's mostly over by then though. And I would guess temps still in the 30's with a low track like that. I not going to dissect much other than it was a big favorable shift from 0z. Yeah, it's not as bad as he made it out to be. I looks better than 0z for us anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Fwiw, both 6Z GFS runs show very similar cold air damming swaths around 0Z Tuesday, but messier soon thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 It does highlight the flaws with this setup when we're flirting with both the nw fringe and the rain snow line on the same run! ETA: for days most guidance has suggested a very narrow region gets anything significant because the cold is retreating so you don't get a great area coverage of waa snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Here's a daily on the first Jan 1987 storm. Some similarities but I'd say the pattern was a bit better overall. That's gotta be a low end -NAO at least? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 12z GFS gives us accumulating snow before dawn on Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yeah, here's the values for Jan 22 1987 AO = -1.721 NAO = -0.981 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Don't like how the shortwave has dug more at 105, not sure that would end well for the cities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Don't like how the shortwave has dug more at 105, not sure that would end well for the cities. Yep, slower is worser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 1004 in N AL at 111 doesn't look to bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yeah, we're toast on the GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Here's a daily on the first Jan 1987 storm. Some similarities but I'd say the pattern was a bit better overall. That's gotta be a low end -NAO at least? thanks Ian. Very similar if you just look at the eastern us but globally some big differences as you pointed out. We have a better starting airmass though so perhaps that offsets the worse north atlantic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yep, slower is worser I'd pay good money for a High in Quebec right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PDIII Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Looks a little bit further south and slightly stronger on the GFS as compared with the 6Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaWarrior2 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yeah, will be warmest/furthest west for GFS by far, little if any snow for most of the area quickly to rain. Mid 40s by 10am Tuesday, Torchy Torch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 1004 in N AL at 111 doesn't look to bad Id rather that was in Georgia at that time. This is going to cut hard once it starts to deepen with all the ridging ahead of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I'd pay good money for a High in Quebec right now. 12z is a straight up disaster. At least we get an inch early mon morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 123 in S NC/N SC border Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Yeah, we're toast on the GFS Surface almost 10C at hour 123 in DC. Let's hope the Euro keeps it's eggs in the first wave basket I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 12z is a straight up disaster. At least we get an inch early mon morning. It's ugly..probably worst GFS run yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.