ers-wxman1 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 It looks a lot like the euro compared to the other models. Looks that way. Much drier and no real surface development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 We may be heading into no win situation territory now. The ggem and gfs actually still have a decent meso scale even only more to our northeast. They also have the least influence from the coastal so they key on the norlun feature more only that's been shifting north slowly last few days as it looked like the lakes low isn't digging as much and that shifts the trough between the two systems north. The euro and nam now have too much influence from the ocean storm and that dampens the trough feature and then they suppress the vorts rounding the trough south of us also due to the suppressive flow behind the storm. neither solution does us any good anymore. If the gfs is right about the lesser effects of the coastal it still implies the trough action is north of us. the mechanism that keeps the track better on the euro is the same mechanism that squashes everything in general also so what are we even really looking for anymore? A miracle I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 We may be heading into no win situation territory now. The ggem and gfs actually still have a decent meso scale even only more to our northeast. They also have the least influence from the coastal so they key on the norlun feature more only that's been shifting north slowly last few days as it looked like the lakes low isn't digging as much and that shifts the trough between the two systems north. The euro and nam now have too much influence from the ocean storm and that dampens the trough feature and then they suppress the vorts rounding the trough south of us also due to the suppressive flow behind the storm. neither solution does us any good anymore. If the gfs is right about the lesser effects of the coastal it still implies the trough action is north of us. the mechanism that keeps the track better on the euro is the same mechanism that squashes everything in general also so what are we even really looking for anymore? A miracle I guess I concur. Accumulating snow in our area now rests with the creator, a divine intervention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paxpatriot Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 NAM-4km looks like a decent event for the NW of DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 NAM-4km looks like a decent event for the NW of DC. What is total QPF? I'm on the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhotoGuy Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 What is total QPF? I'm on the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 What is total QPF? I'm on the road. Looks like crap to me. Thru the end of the run there's nothing in the metro areas. Maybe .2-.3 far n/w. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I think getting the cold air will be the main problem so with that in mind I do not see a suppressed out to sea situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 NAM-4km looks like a decent event for the NW of DC. by decent you mean 1-2" over a 2 county area from some pop up snowshowers. Ugh if that's what we're tracking now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 GFS at 57 is lolworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 This would be a good GFS run if not for the fact that temperatures are in the upper 30s during all of the precipitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Let's not sugar coat the nam it shows the worst case scenario. It really bombs out the coastal into a true blizzard for Boston and a healthy 6"+ snow for nyc even. There is nothing else. The coastal becomes the only show. Maybe some scattered snowshowers with the trough thats it. Come on its not like you can get any development in the flow only 150 miles behind the qpf field of a monster storm giving 2 feet to Boston. That's probably the most hostile setup imaginable. Kinda makes me laugh at the people rooting for the coastal to track more west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I guess LWX sees something else with their disco... 000FXUS61 KLWX 061951AFDLWXAREA FORECAST DISCUSSIONNATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BALTIMORE MD/WASHINGTON DC251 PM EST SAT FEB 6 2016.SHORT TERM /SUNDAY NIGHT THROUGH TUESDAY/...BY SUNDAY NIGHT...THE COASTAL LOW WILL BE MOVING OUT TO SEA WHILE ABROAD UPPER LEVEL LOW MOVES INTO THE GREAT LAKES. THIS VERTICALLYSTACKED SYSTEM WILL MOVE INTO THE OHIO VALLEY BY MONDAY AFTERNOON.AN ASSOCIATED COLD FRONT WILL PROGRESS EASTWARD MONDAY AND RAIN ANDSNOW SHOWERS WILL MOVE ACROSS THE APPALACHIANS BY MONDAY AFTERNOON.SFC TEMPS ARE EXPECTED TO RISE INTO THE U30S/L40S AND L30S IN THEMTNS MONDAY. AS PRECIPITATION MOVES EASTWARD MOST OF IT WILL BE RAINWITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE HIGHER ELEVATIONS. THE BROAD UPPER LEVELLOW WILL MOVE OVERHEAD MONDAY NIGHT INTO TUESDAY AND SFC LOWPRESSURE TRANSFERS TO THE MID-ATLANTIC COAST. THERE IS A LARGESPREAD IN MODEL GUIDANCE FOR MOISTURE AND QPF FIELDS AND THEREFOREUNCERNTAINITY EXISTS IN SNOWFALL ACCUMULATIONS.TEMPS WILL DROP INTO THE 20S AND L30S NEAR I-95 BY TUESDAY MORNINGAND FOR THAT REASON PRECIPITATION WILL TRANSITION TO ALL SNOW INTOTUESDAY. ACCUMULATION IS EXPECTED WITH 3-6 INCHES NORTH AND WEST OFI-95 AND 1-3 INCHES ACROSS THE WASHINGTON DC AND BALTIMORE METROS.AT THIS TIME...THE SNOWFALL ACCUMULATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL IS LOW TOMEDIUM AS POTENTIAL EXISTS FOR HEAVY BANDS OF SNOW TO FORMACROSSTHE MID-ATLANTIC PRODUCING MORE ACCUMULATION. ATTHISTIME...LOCATION OF THESE BANDS COULD EXIST ANYWHERE ACROSS THEMID-ATLANTIC REGION. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 18z gfs looks interesting at 51. Gunna be closer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 18z gfs looks interesting at 51. Gunna be closer Its already out on IWM. Good amount of precipitation but sfc temps are scorching. Probably no accumulation for anybody near the city, taken verbatim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I guess LWX sees something else with their disco... wow thats bullish. They don't even mention the (in my opinion) far more likely low end scenario of a slushy half inch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Best gfs run in a while. This is conservative on snow too. Thru 84 http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016020618&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=084 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Best gfs run in a while. This is conservative on snow too. Thru 84 http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016020618&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=084 Good for you. . Temps approaching 40 in DC during the heaviest precipitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Good for you. . Temps approaching 40 in DC during the heaviest precipitation.Sorta. I'm <5 miles from 3" more accumulation thanks to being on the wrong side of I95. Anyway, hopefully it's a trend that benefits us all and not a blip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Best gfs run in a while. This is conservative on snow too. Thru 84 http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016020618&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=084 Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I'd like to keep these maps -- http://www.weather.gov/lwx/winter (for the upcoming "event") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshfsu123 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 NWS Sterling clearly seems to think it will be cooler around the area, including in DC, than what the GFS and other models are suggesting. Not sure why but they are the experts. We'll see... but I would definitely take the 2-3 inches they are advertising at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Loop of 18z GFS 48-114hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Looking at the regional precip type maps on weatherbelll, you can clearly see that where the model "thinlks" the locally heavier precip will be, its colder at the surface, and it snows. The 18z GFS basically jips DC of the heavier precip(other than initially when the surface is too warm everywhere) and so they dont get much snow... although during the same period(h 66-72), it has heavier stuff over my area into NE MD and Delaware, and 2-3" falls. Just a really weird "storm" and hard to get a handle on. Probably wont know with any confidence whats going to transpire until later tomorrow or Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Eps mean argues against a non event. Still 3- 3.5" thru 96 hours. What I notice that's incouraging is how long the region stays under good moisture flow at 700 mb and even 850 mb. Multiple pieces of energy keep snow chances in play for many hours. Far from boring and far from being nailed down. I hadn't looked and it actually made me reconsider my pessimism a bit. I'm not nearly as bullish as nws but the eps definitely places the trough axis and best dynamics across our area so I guess they are riding that. In general terms about 20% have a total non event. 60% something in the 1-4" range and 20% show something significant. It's clear what we want though as the members that have a 4"+ snow max in our area all miss nyc with significant snow from the coastal and most don't even give Boston much. On the flip side the runs that have a raging blizzard in Boston and 6"+ in nyc are the total nothing cluster for our area. Basically if nyc is getting heavy snow rotating in off the ocean monday we are enjoying partly cloudy skies in the subsidence behind that coastal monster. If NYC is partly cloudy outside the qpf shield then maybe we have a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clueless Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 LWX forecast confidence is low-medium. I will take the under numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 It's hard for me to believe we see 3-6" west of I-95 from this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I hadn't looked and it actually made me reconsider my pessimism a bit. I'm not nearly as bullish as nws but the eps definitely places the trough axis and best dynamics across our area so I guess they are riding that. In general terms about 20% have a total non event. 60% something in the 1-4" range and 20% show something significant. It's clear what we want though as the members that have a 4"+ snow max in our area all miss nyc with significant snow from the coastal and most don't even give Boston much. On the flip side the runs that have a raging blizzard in Boston and 6"+ in nyc are the total nothing cluster for our area. Basically if nyc is getting heavy snow rotating in off the ocean monday we are enjoying partly cloudy skies in the subsidence behind that coastal monster. If NYC is partly cloudy outside the qpf shield then maybe we have a shot. Interesting to me that WPC has Boston in a 10% chance of 4" for that storm. Evidently they feel that storm will be further out to sea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 What did the para NAM show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.