WinterWolf Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Lmao... 12-18...and GFS says you get 2-4. It's slipping away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HullMA Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Ill buy it if they double down at 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 18z GFS through 36 hour total, valid Tuesday 6z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Man some of you really cling to every single run. I think I'd wait until 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowedin Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 I will say nam is struggling in eastern NC right now. My concern still despite my flags, is that models are missing that arc of lift into SNE. That to me is the thing to watch. Models struggle with that. Also, pym county could get a OES blitz. There may be hefty totals in the classic areas near and south of me. Norwell Hanover marshfield etc. I like the sound of that. The last storm definitely surprised me by dropping about 10" by the time things settled down. I think some people are going to be quite surprised, depending on where heavier banding sets up. What are your thoughts on the snow consistency this time around? I'm not too keen on shoveling several inches or more of back breaking snow once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Man some of you really cling to every single run. I think I'd wait until 00z. Unfortunately I have to put a call out to the public by 6 PM tonight -- don't have the luxury of waiting to see if the trend is real or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Lmao... 12-18...and GFS says you get 2-4. It's slipping away. yup...all this wishcasting bc the low is tucked in a little more and or precip is falling a bit more north than progged but all guidance has been pushing this thing way offshore..sure a few ticks e or w here and there and yes its a monster offshore but this just is not going to be a high impact event outside of now perhaps extreme coastal areas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 fwiw at 21z: 12z NAM had better handling of SLP position / depth than 18z NAM 18z NAM ~ 4 mb too weak also, precipitation fields ~ 50 miles more expansive to northwest than both 12z NAM and 18z NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 6+ back to River . I'll go to grave with that final call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Man some of you really cling to every single run. I think I'd wait until 00z. it's comical in here with the comments.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 fwiw at 21z: 12z NAM had better handling of SLP position / depth than 18z NAM 18z NAM ~ 4 mb too weak also, precipitation fields ~ 50 miles more expansive to northwest than both 12z NAM and 18z NAM no way bro, storm cancel, 18z said so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 A moderate snowfall back to ORH with localized OES jackpot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Man some of you really cling to every single run. I think I'd wait until 00z.I like the Euro in this type of setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Burbank Potential Snowfall Tomorrow Morning Through Tomorrow Night. The Fluff Factor In Play This Time... Easier To Shovel! pic.twitter.com/xx1VrwLVTG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Burbank Potential Snowfall Tomorrow Morning Through Tomorrow Night. The Fluff Factor In Play This Time... Easier To Shovel! pic.twitter.com/xx1VrwLVTG That's a good cal I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 solid map from Burbank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 That's a good cal I think yeah, seems very reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlantStickers Anonymous Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 yeah, seems very reasonable. I agree, but some of the posts in here make it sound as though we need to drop down to a dusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 WCVB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 down to 988mb per latest SPC analysis.. not sure what GFS had, but don't think it had 988mb at 21z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Man some of you really cling to every single run. I think I'd wait until 00z. Mind you, I am not at all sold on a huge event, but I think the models are trash here. This is nowcast, and should in no way, shape or form should be written off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 7, 2016 Author Share Posted February 7, 2016 WCVB thats about what I'm thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 solid map from Burbank. Pretty ballz to wall for W of ORH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 WCVB That looks very reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Pretty ballz to wall for W of ORH. true...but I think decent stuff makes it nw. we will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
512high Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Do most of you agree that this will be a "fluffy snow" vs what we had on the last event ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 18z gfs is off already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 yup...all this wishcasting bc the low is tucked in a little more and or precip is falling a bit more north than progged but all guidance has been pushing this thing way offshore..sure a few ticks e or w here and there and yes its a monster offshore but this just is not going to be a high impact event outside of now perhaps extreme coastal areas I wouldnt write the epithet just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 true...but I think decent stuff makes it nw. we will see. Yeah, I'm mildly skeptical but also trust Burbank has a met and it seems like the precip shield on this beast is pretty robust E to W unlike some of our more tightly wound nukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 18z gfs is off already. yeah posted that above when looking at the 21z mesoanalysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.