dryslot Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 18z RGEM is west of 12z 12z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I'm surprised that there is no compensation for the higher elevations in northern Tolland/Windham Ctys. I think the valley may have issues. Yeah - built in ranges should deal with that to some extent. I do think there's an issue on the western fringe with lighter rates and marginal boundary layer so our gradient is a bit tighter than it otherwise would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 RGEM is impressive to the Cape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Rgem is sweet looking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I call this the Birthday Blue Bomb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Everything is trending to the Euro, is anyone surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 RGEM is impressive to the Cape. That looks beautiful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2016 Author Share Posted February 4, 2016 Everything is trending to the Euro, is anyone surprisedYou mean Ukie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSnowman Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 WSW Flags are up But... Only for 4-8. Chance to move up though so good start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Agree. It flips most over by 7 or 8am. Crushed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 You mean Ukie? ^like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2016 Author Share Posted February 4, 2016 That is a punishing hit on Rgem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 ^like you have Ukie snow precip maps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 You mean Ukie? Yes, Ukie jumped on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapturedNature Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Yeah - built in ranges should deal with that to some extent. I do think there's an issue on the western fringe with lighter rates and marginal boundary layer so our gradient is a bit tighter than it otherwise would be. The ranges look fine...I just think a place like Enfield is going to be closer to the 1-3" range and Union/Woodstock closer to the 6-9" range. I can't speak for other places - just my gut feeling on the local area. FWIW, a 2" range might better exemplify the tight gradient on the western edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 you have Ukie snow precip maps? No. Are you arguing ukie didn't lead the way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 OKX has 4-6 at work, , good start, lol Robo alert went out, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteLawns Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 ALY updated map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 No. Are you arguing ukie didn't lead the way? wut? no just asking, holy crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backedgeapproaching Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Thoughts on this map? snow map.jpg I really wish albany was more optimistic... ALY latest.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 There could be a crazy band in there somewhere...the way this is trending, you're going to have probably a nice stripe of -EPV as Tip mentioned and overlaid on the fronto....so don't be shocked to get a really intense band for a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 wut? no just asking, holy crap Sorry I thought you were being sassy. No I don't know where to get a ukie snow map, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Sorry I thought you were being sassy. No I don't know where to get a ukie snow map, do you? no but lol on kevin for referencing a hot linked image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapturedNature Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 ALY latest.. That's a decent map and represents my thinking out this way. I think we might be closer to 6" though around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 There could be a crazy band in there somewhere...the way this is trending, you're going to have probably a nice stripe of -EPV as Tip mentioned and overlaid on the fronto....so don't be shocked to get a really intense band for a time. Yeah. That thermal ribbon is a classic recipe for -EPV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2016 Author Share Posted February 4, 2016 That's a decent map and represents my thinking out this way. I think we might be closer to 6" though around here. I think you and I end up in the 7-10" range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Yeah. That thermal ribbon is a classic recipe for -EPV. My name is thumpy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIcoastalWX Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 You guys will be fine. I don't see only 2" of slush. My (very) unprofessional assessment is probably off and maybe I shouldn't be focusing on the dew point for this type of event - but when I see a dew point in the upper 30's and not budging (except for one nudge up) that has a history of not always boding well for much snow down this way. But then again - my meteorological 'education' ends at watching John Ghiorse on channel 10 for 30 years and living next to the ocean for 50! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Well once again kids Jerry drops his Mexican dinner 8 out there and boom shakalacka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Valley Snowman Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 The ranges look fine...I just think a place like Enfield is going to be closer to the 1-3" range and Union/Woodstock closer to the 6-9" range. I can't speak for other places - just my gut feeling on the local area. FWIW, a 2" range might better exemplify the tight gradient on the western edge. If Enfield gets the banding that most models are showing, it's 3-6 as we WETBULB down to freezing. If the rates aren't there than yes 1-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.