Rjay Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:26 AM, UlsterCountySnowZ said: Where's all the NAM trolls from the last 2 days?I'm right here and I'll be waiting for my 3-4' In all honesty, if this does really happen then the NAM def scores one in my book. It would be about dam time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:29 AM, UlsterCountySnowZ said: I gotta give it to you dude... You held serve on the NAM.. Only one other than some of us northern guys, who were really just wishcasting and got luckyThanks brotherSent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 GFS is going to be better this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:31 AM, Rjay said: I'm right here and I'll be waiting for my 3-4' In all honesty, if this does really happen then the NAM def scores one in my book. It would be about dam time. Payback for last January Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:30 AM, pazzo83 said: I think everyone is a little surprised with how this is playing out. You kind of said it-how Philly was supposed to do on 2/6/10 and how they actually did. This looks to be NYC this time. Same with Boston on PDII-I remember they were supposed to be on the north fringe and have maybe 12", they ended up with an all time record, and beat us all further down the seaboard who were supposed to be the winners. Sometimes it pays off to be on the northern end and wiggle with the confluence zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wthrmn654 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Gfs at hours's 00,06 tick south of each slide but nothing drastic at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:31 AM, ScottB said: Gfs initialized. Think ill take a peak at this then the euro then stick with hires short term models I honestly don't even think the euro is worth looking at tonight. maybe to see if it got the clue but other than that, meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:31 AM, Rjay said: I'm right here and I'll be waiting for my 3-4' In all honesty, if this does really happen then the NAM def scores one in my book. It would be about dam time. Lol... Good luck, still don't buy the wetter solution this far... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 GFS and euro aren't even worth it anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 NYC crushed on the GFS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntenseBlizzard2014 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 It's now unanimous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 From here, focus on the short term models and radar. It's already snowing across much of the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowsintherain Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Images please!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottB Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Gfs crushjob. Thats all i wanted to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:35 AM, Snow88 said: NYC crushed on the GFS We're getting 2' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masomenos Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The upper level trends have been trending favorably on nearly every model since the global models had that batch of ugly runs 12z Wednesday. Just goes to show you how QPF maps and other surface maps should be used mainly for a very rough idea outside of a day or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:33 AM, UlsterCountySnowZ said: Lol... Good luck, still don't buy the wetter solution this far... On 1/23/2016 at 3:33 AM, UlsterCountySnowZ said: Lol... Good luck, still don't buy the wetter solution this far... Hopefully I'm wrong about the I-84 dividing line. Someone up there might really win if the northern end of the heavy snow shield can make it. Problem is, just north of that likely gets squat due to subsidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monmouth_County_Jacpot Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 If this all verifies I will be happy for the rest of the winter I could care less if it's in the 70's from now till apirl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 00z GFS is 12-24" everywhere except North of 84. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason WX Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Guys.. It's happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 NAM dethroned the euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowBlitzkrieg Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 this is simply amazing. i can't believe the NAM was right all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth.P Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 All credit to the NAM here, but I still don't know if I can trust it 100% moving forward. Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasperk99 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Can anyone recommend a good radar website to use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemost Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:43 AM, jasperk99 said: Can anyone recommend a good radar website to use? http://sirocco.accuweather.com/nxssa_r1_h_500x620d/r1h/inxr1KPHLa_h.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 demolished on the GFS. Are you kidding me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzo83 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:35 AM, Snow88 said: NYC crushed on the GFS Hope you are ready for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 The NAM has always been good at picking up on banding. The incredible thing about this is the NAM picked this up at the end of its run days ago and would not give in, at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violentweatherfan Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:43 AM, jasperk99 said: Can anyone recommend a good radar website to use? http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/nexrad/index.php?type=DIX-N0Q-0-24# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 On 1/23/2016 at 3:42 AM, Seth.P said: All credit to the NAM here, but I still don't know if I can trust it 100% moving forward. Haha I still remember the NAM runs last January, 24 hours before Juno that dropped 4 feet on Nassau County, so no, I still don't trust it over more reliable models or a consensus, but this was a huge win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.