Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Storm Banter & Complaint Thread, Jan 22-23


No snow for you

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Screw NWF, those suck. This will go down as an epic bust in NW mtns and foothills. Amazing how models could get things remotely close back in 93 but they can't hit the broad side of a barn in 2016.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Biggest snow disappointment in my time watching the weather
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw NWF, those suck. This will go down as an epic bust in NW mtns and foothills. Amazing how models could get things remotely close back in 93 but they can't hit the broad side of a barn in 2016.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree NW Flow i'm sunny and 40 degrees here I live in downslope city!!! N.Foothills I have an EPIC fail on my yard too!!!! I was talking about Mountains tomorrow, Not here!!!  :axe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two generations ago, they landed on the moon with the use of slide rules and graph paper.  Landed on the freakin' moon.  We need to call all those guys back (the ones still living) and have them work on weather prediction modeling.  I'm pretty sure they couldn't be any worse than we are now.

You could probably have a really good model, but it'd take a really long time to run, longer than the lead time. That's the problem we have to solve. We don't just have to land on the moon, we have to do it daily and quickly enough to be useful. That's quite different. Also, landing on the moon you have to get one ship, with humans on board, to the right place. With weather prediction, you have to get the whole atmosphere, with no human intervention, somewhere. A bit more difficult I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two generations ago, they landed on the moon with the use of slide rules and graph paper.  Landed on the freakin' moon.  We need to call all those guys back (the ones still living) and have them work on weather prediction modeling.  I'm pretty sure they couldn't be any worse than we are now.

Imma getting sick of models, they lie like the devil! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could probably have a really good model, but it'd take a really long time to run, longer than the lead time. That's the problem we have to solve. We don't just have to land on the moon, we have to do it daily and quickly enough to be useful. That's quite different. Also, landing on the moon you have to get one ship, with humans on board, to the right place. With weather prediction, you have to get the whole atmosphere, with no human intervention, somewhere. A bit more difficult I'd say.

 

Well, you might not have picked up on my use of hyperbole, but I still say that we should just call those old white guys in short-sleeve dress shirts with pocket protectors and see what they can do.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest gripe so far are those ignorant news writers with articles titled "Blizzard Cripples Eastern US", etc. The media will publish anything that sells. Damn that 2nd Amendment! :blahblah:

The 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms, do you mean the 1st amendment?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From JB

RECIPE FOR BOMBOGENESIS

January 22 12:18 PM

35 degree temp difference over 50 miles. Yahtzee!

This was posted in the main discussion thread but I wanted to ask my question here. I understand that the low bombing out intensifies the system. What is making him so excited about this ? Below is the image that I failed and attach at first.

post-13275-0-85187600-1453486843_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was posted in the main discussion thread but I wanted to ask my question here. I understand that the low bombing out intensifies the system. What is making him so excited about this ? Below is the image that I failed and attach at first.

attachicon.gifzkNPbJy.jpg

Because it means it will now blow up and slam the MA and NE, his sole regional concerns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it means it will now blow up and slam the MA and NE, his sole regional concerns

Thanks for the reply. So he was basically saying this intensification only benefits folks further north and therefore, I will continue to see weather that even my dogs won't go out in. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...