JonathanW Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 This run also moves a stronger wind field farther NW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 still about 1.7, and it's missing two 6 hrs there. one blank, the other: I think it counts the weird one above in its total precip: hence the 2" for DCA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 EuroWx is still not moving from 12 hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell is up now. I wouldn't be worried yet what the Euro does at hour 42. It takes the low at 36 which looks perfectly positioned and then sends it due east 300 miles at 42 yet the deform bands sets up well west. Looks weird to me. Ah, now it makes more sense in my brain. It's the same double low weirdness. At hr 42 the eastern low near the triple point is going off. The "dryslot" looks more like subsidence in the deform because of convection over the ocean. That 2 low interaction is causing a lot of jumps with the euro during the transition from waa to ccb. The 42hr panel could be right but it's suspect in my eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell is up now. I wouldn't be worried yet what the Euro does at hour 42. It takes the low at 36 which looks perfectly positioned and then sends it due east 300 miles at 42 yet the deform bands sets up well west. Looks weird to me. It is model sensitivity to deep convection. All the models are going to struggle here, and even the best will have potential large run-to-run issues with how deep convection alters the entire synoptic picture. It would be interesting to see how the higher res para ECMWF simulates the DMC as it becomes displaced to the east of the upper low center and more oriented with the coupled jet max. Either way, once again, this storm is going to be incredible and rather widespread for significant accums. Enjoy it, Alaska has suffered through 3 awful winters. At least you have something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 This is exhausting, so basically the whole run is not happening?. - As of now we have NO data between hour 12 and hour 24. So we do NOT know how much falls in that period. Probably only like 0.1 for DC and less for you. - There are 6 hour panels available for AFTER that period. That data is available. So we have data for MOST of the storm. - Whatever WXbell is showing for total precip is bogus because it includes some weird panel at 24 that shouldnt even exist. It's a good run for you...You probably get like 1.9 or something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell has the 24 hour panel fixed - looks like .4 for DCA. 2" total QPF with perhaps a little bit more missing In the 18 hour panel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 can someone post the 42 hour map? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCAlexandria Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell has the 24 hour panel fixed - looks like .4 for DCA. 2" total QPF with perhaps a little bit more missing In the 18 hour panel. so that puts DCA at 2.1"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 - As of now we have NO data between hour 12 and hour 24. So we do NOT know how much falls in that period. Probably only like 0.1 for DC and less for you. - There are 6 hour panels available for AFTER that period. That data is available. So we have data for MOST of the storm. - Whatever WXbell is showing for total precip is bogus because it includes some weird panel at 24 that shouldnt even exist. It's a good run for you...You probably get like 1.9 or something like that Thanks Matt, i appreciate your detailed explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell maps match accuweather text so there is no problem with the run. correct...all we are missing is a small amount of QPF....probably like 0.10" for many of us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowman. Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 From the NE forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 - As of now we have NO data between hour 12 and hour 24. So we do NOT know how much falls in that period. Probably only like 0.1 for DC and less for you. - There are 6 hour panels available for AFTER that period. That data is available. So we have data for MOST of the storm. - Whatever WXbell is showing for total precip is bogus because it includes some weird panel at 24 that shouldnt even exist. It's a good run for you...You probably get like 1.9 or something like that 24 hour panel on wxbell is fixed. Looks like 0.4 for DCA. Wxbell total precip looks right. Front end thump is crushing on this run. If not for dry slot DCA would easily have 2'+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanW Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 - As of now we have NO data between hour 12 and hour 24. So we do NOT know how much falls in that period. Probably only like 0.1 for DC and less for you. - There are 6 hour panels available for AFTER that period. That data is available. So we have data for MOST of the storm. - Whatever WXbell is showing for total precip is bogus because it includes some weird panel at 24 that shouldnt even exist. It's a good run for you...You probably get like 1.9 or something like that I like the 24 hour panel. It's the storm that broke the models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 the euro is unimpressive Saturday after 12z. if its right....people will wake up and see a normal steady snow and say it was a bust. 12z to 18z is .39 and 18z to 00z is .23 for JYO. then its pretty much over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Wxbell has the 24 hour panel fixed - looks like .4 for DCA. 2" total QPF with perhaps a little bit more missing In the 18 hour panel. There is almost no way that panel is right and if Wxbell is trying to estimate it is BS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 In reality. All we need to do is look at this and know we are getting crushed tomorrow. The Euro still wouldnt have been able to tell us reliably who gets in the deform band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 There is almost no way that panel is right and if Wxbell is trying to estimate it is BS.... Compare it to 12z accounting for faster start. Looks about right to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 the euro is unimpressive Saturday after 12z. if its right....people will wake up and see a normal steady snow and say it was a bust. 12z to 18z is .39 and 18z to 00z is .23 for JYO. then its pretty much over lol there's a huge band over you and just west 12-18z winchester gets .6 and I get .1 that panel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighStakes Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Ah, now it makes more sense in my brain. It's the same double low weirdness. At hr 42 the eastern low near the triple point is going off. The "dryslot" looks more like subsidence in the deform because of convection over the ocean. That 2 low interaction is causing a lot of jumps with the euro during the transition from waa to ccb. The 42hr panel could be right but it's suspect in my eyes. I just looked again at 36. The low is actually almost directly over Norfolk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Compare it to 12z accounting for faster start. Looks about right to me. that we get 0.4" before 0z....lol....This whole conversation is starting to get annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Can someone please post updated qpf totals from euro? Like I said 2.0" for DCA. But Westminsterdeathband seems to think that's not right which could certainly be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 In reality. All we need to do is look at this and know we are getting crushed tomorrow. The Euro still wouldnt have been able to tell us reliably who gets in the deform band. You guys should be paying attention more to this than begging for QPF maps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 lol there's a huge band over you and just west 12-18z winchester gets .6 and I get .1 that panel. thats winchesters band...not mine. i get .39 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaskaETC Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I just looked again at 36. The low is actually almost directly over Norfolk. Yeah..it's weird. The process there will probably be complex, as Baroclinic Zone said, a lot of stuff is going to happen with this beauty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Like I said 2.0" for DCA. But Westminsterdeathband seems to think that's not right which could certainly be true. It is REALLY unlikely...someone should ask Ryan Maue why that panel is sitting there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 DC is 1.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 thats winchesters band...not mine. i get .39 well at least it'll be a happy and lucky surprise when you and mapgirl get 30" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 In reality. All we need to do is look at this and know we are getting crushed tomorrow. The Euro still wouldnt have been able to tell us reliably who gets in the deform band. Yes. It seems that many in this day and age of instant satisfaction find it difficult to accept what they have/get and to be happy with it. Let the atmosphere tell the story. Of course, for those who are actually forecasting, they do NEED to pay attention to the small details, but here, this is going to be a pretty incredible storm regardless for the remainder who are simply watching and savoring (or...worrying). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 You guys should be paying attention more to this than begging for QPF maps. We should listen to someone from Winchester who is 100 miles from the dry slot? ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.