clskinsfan Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Exceptional. I've never seen anything like this. Tapping three bodies of water and very warm water at that. Likely to see a lot of lightning and explosive rates...3, 4 inches per hour. I am loving this right here! When you have a seasoned met saying "exceptional I've never seen anything like this" You know your in good shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jviper Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Exceptional. I've never seen anything like this. Tapping three bodies of water and very warm water at that. Likely to see a lot of lightning and explosive rates...3, 4 inches per hour. Are you going to be back in town for this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wx4cast Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The weird thing is I expect that type of ridiculous qpf output from the NAM. You can easily write that off as the NAM being the NAM. I don't believe the GFS has any bias when it comes to overdoing qpf, so to see that much is startling and makes you wonder if maybe it is legit. It also has some support from the RGEM. It has a bit of a bias still in showing too high a qpf in cold airmasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Reilly Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? BLIZZARD JONAS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwonder Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? Jonas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? F TWC - Randytastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? Jan 22-23 2016 Blizzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 BLIZZARD JONAS NO NO NO NO NWS does not recognize TWC stupid naming of winter storms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokierulz98 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? Jonas if you want to believe the Weather Channel. This one should be Maximus Decimus Meridius if you've got to do something stoopid and name winter storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jviper Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Jonas is the weather channel one. I like randytastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanW Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 HRRR also showing a 17-18z arrival for snow in the DC area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Exceptional. I've never seen anything like this. Tapping three bodies of water and very warm water at that. Likely to see a lot of lightning and explosive rates...3, 4 inches per hour. Super El Nino...2 extreme months of weather so far this winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbsisson Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 El nino says we call this storm "snow way Jose" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interstate Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Jonas is the weather channel one. I like randytastic. You asked the question but already knew TWC name??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 It has a bit of a bias still in showing too high a qpf in cold airmasses. If this is only a bit, we are going to get destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Chaos Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Do we have a name for this blizzard? "BECS" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jviper Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 No I googled it. Sorry My banter is over. You asked the question but already knew TWC name??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxdude64 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 If this is only a bit, we are going to get destroyed. Yeah, even if it is 20% overdone, still epic event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I'm sticking with nuclear snow globe. Atomic snow globe would be acceptable too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCAlexandria Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 "BECS" \ GOAT Storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I'm sticking with nuclear snow globe. Atomic snow globe would be acceptable too. the post game discussions of this storm will take so long.....by the time we recover, the pattern will have flipped back to cold and snowy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 \ GOAT Storm. I've seen that acronym before...GOAT. What does it mean? LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburns Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The Dump No other description needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Slightly off topic, but where do you guys get the exact qpf totals for the UKMET? I added up all the mm precip panels on meteocentree and got 2.1-3". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Slightly off topic, but where do you guys get the exact qpf totals for the UKMET? I added up all the mm precip panels on meteocentree and got 2.1-3". I think that's what others did too. That sounds about what was posted a couple pages back. It's something like four 6-h periods of >10mm or >15mm, there about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I'm guilty as well but let's keep banter in the banter thread and not discuss storm names and snow globes and stuff here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlaskaETC Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Slightly off topic, but where do you guys get the exact qpf totals for the UKMET? I added up all the mm precip panels on meteocentree and got 2.1-3". I got 2.2"...it's probably bigger than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caviman2201 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I've seen that acronym before...GOAT. What does it mean? LOL! Greatest Of All Time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 OMFG. Prepare to faint. 0Z GFS Cobb numbers.....MRB 56.5 inches. IAD 46.3 inches. DCA 30.7 inches. MRB: 60124/0300Z 51 34007KT 25.2F SNOW 16:1| 2.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.141 17:1| 56.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 3.28 100| 0| 0 IAD: 160124/0600Z 54 33008KT 24.0F SNOW 6:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.056 13:1| 46.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 3.63 100| 0| 0 DCA: 160124/0600Z 54 35013KT 25.8F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.049 10:1| 30.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 2.94 100| 0| 0 BWI: 160124/0600Z 54 36022KT 27.2F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.051 10:1| 25.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 2.55 100| 0| 0 RIC: 160124/0600Z 54 35012KT 27.2F SNOW 5:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013 10:1| 26.8|| 0.00|| 0.17|| 3.39 100| 0| 0 CHO: 160124/0600Z 54 32004KT 20.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 12:1| 27.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 2.27 0| 0| 0 WOO: 160124/0900Z 57 30004KT 11.7F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 16:1| 42.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 2.66 0| 0| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.