Snowman. Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 UKMET From hrs 36 to 48, UKIE probably moves no more than 50-100 miles... looks like there's a capture as well Good news for the upcoming Euro run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Maybe a stupid question, but what if the dropsondes introduce bias to the models - eg if they are dropped in am unrepresentatively moist area of the current storm? Then, the bias would propagate through all the models. Some of it could be that now that the storm is actually happening and not just a digital calculation at initialization that NWP is getting a better handle on how to evolve what is already there and not what might/should be there. That in combination with sounding data should by default improve accuracy down the line. With that being said, I don't think the gfs was accurate qpf wise. We're starting to look really good for the deform stuff imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanW Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Anyone see the 13 km GFS? Widespread 4-5" QPF, with 7"+ a little south of DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Jesus, hrs 39 to 45 on the 18z GFS para is randytastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 maps?? http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=00&mod=ukmet&stn=PNMPR&comp=1&run2=00&mod2=ukmet&stn2=PNMPR&hh2=072&fixhh=1&stn2_type=prog&mode=latest&yyyy=latest&mm=latest&dd=latest&hh=024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Some of it could be that now that the storm is actually happening and not just a digital calculation at initialization that NWP is getting a better handle on how to evolve what is already there and not what might/should be there. That in combination with sounding data should by default improve accuracy down the line. With that being said, I don't think the gfs was accurate qpf wise. We're starting to look really good for the deform stuff imo. Right now, barring any indication otherwise, I'm sure the absolute numbers are overdone. But the expanse of the precip field and getting us into the deformation area is the key like you indicate. Even dialing back on the crazy numbers, the GFS still upped the bar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 18z para GFS shows 3"+ QPF... and asks DO YOU LIKE THAT?!?!!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmlwx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 18z Parallel GFS is extremely moist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 NAM Fire Nest comes in early for us! http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/firewx_00z_refd1000_animate_1h.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 UKMET From hrs 36 to 48, UKIE probably moves no more than 50-100 miles... looks like there's a capture as well It just sits there basically until later Saturday night. I haven't bothered to add up those QPF panels but looks like four 6-h periods of >10mm or >15mm, from what I could read on those maps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I know its outside its range, but the GEFS mean is so tasty and looks so nice... supports the OP nicely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 It just sits there basically until later Saturday night. I haven't bothered to add up those QPF panels but looks like four 6-h periods of >10mm or >15mm, from what I could read on those maps. Eyeballing the Meteogram, it looks like about 55 mm or ~2.2" in DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeoman Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 NAM Fire Nest comes in early for us! http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/firewx_00z_refd1000_animate_1h.html Nasty dry slot up the bay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I've got 2.9 for DCA. Where are your numbers from? Re: GGEM I just keep scratching my head and asking how can that much moisture Not overwhelm the cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The main changes in the GFS para (to be implemented...around Apr/May?) are to the initialization and data assimilation, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Chaos Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 UKMET From hrs 36 to 48, UKIE probably moves no more than 50-100 miles... looks like there's a capture as well Looks like it retrogrades over the mouth of the Chesapeake from 30 to 48? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Ummm. The UK is ridiculous. If my math is right. It's 2.75+ areawide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I know its outside its range, but the GEFS mean is so tasty and looks so nice... supports the OP nicely Thanks...was wondering that. Yeah, GEFS are kind of outside their range but I was curious whether they were remotely similar to the crazy ops numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high risk Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 sorry to nitpick, but the GEFS *should* support the OP at this range. Its perturbations need time to grow, so it's tough to significantly diverge from the GFS solution within 72 hours. I know its outside its range, but the GEFS mean is so tasty and looks so nice... supports the OP nicely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCAlexandria Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Nasty dry slot up the bay As noted early NAM did NOT get the dropsonde data that the 0z suite received. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Nasty dry slot up the bayI saw that too. Sends half of the South Atlantic over Dca and Md. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 UKMET From hrs 36 to 48, UKIE probably moves no more than 50-100 miles... looks like there's a capture as well 8.5 mph max. Average would be like what-20 to 25? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 sorry to nitpick, but the GEFS *should* support the OP at this range. Its perturbations need time to grow, so it's tough to significantly diverge from the GFS solution within 72 hours. Thank you for that note... appreciate it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Exceptional. I've never seen anything like this. Tapping three bodies of water and very warm water at that. Likely to see a lot of lightning and explosive rates...3, 4 inches per hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yuki neko Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The main changes in the GFS para (to be implemented...around Apr/May?) are to the initialization and data assimilation, correct? I believe so. 4D-Var Data assimilation and some other things. Just a high schooler so I have no clue what any of it means.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ncskywarn Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 NAM Fire Nest comes in early for us! http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/mmbpll/firewx/firewx_00z_refd1000_animate_1h.html WPC Model DiscussionSYSTEM MOVING THROUGH THE SOUTHEAST/MID ATLANTIC COAST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~PREFERENCE: NON-NAM COMPROMISECONFIDENCE: ABOVE AVERAGETHE 00Z NAM IS A NORTHWARD OUTLIER ALOFT SATURDAY MORNING BEFOREBECOMING A SLOW OUTLIER THEREAFTER -- THE NAM HAS A BIAS OFOCCASIONALLY BEING TOO SLOW. A COMPROMISE OF THE 00Z GFS/12ZECMWF/12Z CANADIAN/12Z UKMET IS PREFERRED WITH ABOVE AVERAGECONFIDENCE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The warm fall kept SST's well above normal in the Gulf and Atlantic. This is a likely player. Warmer water, more energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 sorry to nitpick, but the GEFS *should* support the OP at this range. Its perturbations need time to grow, so it's tough to significantly diverge from the GFS solution within 72 hours. Good point, hence the reason they aren't much help at this range. I was just curious just how similar it was to the ops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Mitch, I remember chatting with you in Feb 2003 saying we will never seen anything like we're about to see.. I think I lied.Well, you hid the lie for 13 years, so you get some credit! People jokingly throw around the expression "shelter in place" all the time here. This time it really is no joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Simply for S&G....00z GEFS...that's like a mean snowfall of 30" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.