Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,597
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    DAinDC
    Newest Member
    DAinDC
    Joined

Central PA OMG SNOW thread -- Winter 2016


neff

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No, not really. On the 18z, for example, 9/20 of the ensembles gave State College about 0.4" or less. On the 00z, it's 8/20.

 

It definitely seems like there are more southern sliders this suite though.

 

Who knows, not a big deal at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't see anything that really jumps out to me vs 12z through 90, 90 hour frame the lows a bit deeper in central Tenn west of the Apps.. which could indicate a slight bit more primary. Transferring at 96 to SC coast with precip just getting across the mason-dixon in SW PA...still pretty close to 12z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

105 992 E NC. 0.25+ crossing state line. 0.1+ MDT.

108-111 Similar.

114 0.1+ advancing toward 80.

117 0.25+ LSV, MDT. 0.1+ elsewhere.

120 0.25+ Poconos-Voyager on SW.

123 some 0.5+ penetrating SE-SC PA. 0.25+ toward AVP and SW, missing UNV-AOO.

126 0.25+ Poconos-Hazleton and running SW toward MDT and SC-SE PA.

129 0.1+ hanging around in eastern 1/3rd of PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

105 992 E NC. 0.25+ crossing state line. 0.1+ MDT.

108-111 Similar.

114 0.1+ advancing toward 80.

117 0.25+ LSV, MDT. 0.1+ elsewhere.

120 0.25+ Poconos-Voyager on SW.

123 some 0.5+ penetrating SE-SC PA. 0.25+ toward AVP and SW, missing UNV-AOO.

 

so good?

 

Freaking EuroWX is so far behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crazy how the EURO is flip-flopping while other models remain generally consistent.

 

I would say the Euro is reflecting the uncertainty better. The GFS ensembles show the same range of solutions, it's just that the operational runs have happened to align with the northern camp for several runs in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say the Euro is reflecting the uncertainty better. The GFS ensembles show the same range of solutions, it's just that the operational runs have happened to align with the northern camp for several runs in a row.

one would think that there would be uncertainty 4 days out. The only thing I see is that all the models show the same thing but the amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The basic look I have of the 0z Euro ensemble mean shows that it is fairly similar to the GFS ensemble mean with precip extent and low placement (GFS Ensemble slightly better in northern PA). Also maintains fairly decent continuity with the 12z Euro EPS mean with perhaps a very slight bump north with the extent of heavier precip in southern PA in the 0z run. 

 

It's a very interesting setup, with very short wavelengths... certainly not one you can follow the traditional rule of thumb of the western 500mb ridge axis over Boise, ID equalling heavy Mid Atlantic/PA snows. Further scrutinizing between the GFS and Euro operationals shows that the Euro is more amplified with the 500mb ridge out west (or more like the central US by the time the storm is going on) as the Euro appears to be driving in a slower and stronger shortwave into the west coast than the GFS, amplifying the ridge and thus amplifying the 500 low responsible for our storm notably further south than the GFS. One can notice the same thing at the 700 and 850mb levels and the associated lows at those levels being further south on the ECM. This might have implications on where the heavy precip eventually sets up, so the shortwave behind the one that becomes our storm is probably worth watching too.. and the one that's to be our actual storm isn't even on shore and well sampled yet either. So definitely intriguing, as this is quite likely to become a big winter storm with the potential for excessive snows.. but the finer nuances of the overall pattern could determine where that might be. 

 

 For now through the 12z runs today, I would simply take a blend of the GFS and Euro ensembles, as they make a nice consensus between the GFS and ECM ops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSION

NWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD

1232 AM EST TUE JAN 19 2016

VALID 12Z FRI JAN 22 2016 - 12Z TUE JAN 26 2016

HIGHLIGHTS...

THE PRIMARY IMPACTS THIS PERIOD WILL BE FOR HIGH CONFIDENCE IN A

MAJOR WINTER STORM INCLUDING HEAVY SNOWS FOR THE URBAN CORRIDOR

EXTENDING FROM WASHINGTON DC TO NEW YORK AND BOSTON FRIDAY INTO

SUNDAY WITH THE LOW'S ANTICIPATED TRACK AND SWATH OF HIGH LIQUID

EQUIVALENTS SUPPORTING 1 TO 2 FEET NEAR AND NORTHWEST OF I-95.

COASTAL FLOODING AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO MARINE INTERESTS

FROM THE MID-ATLANTIC INTO THE NORTHEAST ARE ALSO LIKELY.

IN THE WEST...PRECIPITATION SHOULD WANE ALONG THE COAST DAY 3 INTO

DAY 4...WITH THE NEXT MAJOR PRECIPITATION EVENT EXPECTED ACROSS

THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST BY NEXT MONDAY OR TUESDAY...WITH SEVERAL

INCHES OF LIQUID EQUIVALENT EXPECTED.

MODEL CHOICES AND CONFIDENCE...

THE GROWING AMPLITUDE AND WAVELENGTH OF THE PATTERN IS ACCOMPANIED

BY MUCH LESS SPREAD OF ALL MEMBERS INCLUDING ENSEMBLES...WHICH

SUPPORTS GREATER USE AND RELIANCE UPON THE DETERMINISTIC SOLUTIONS

FOR ABOUT 1 OR 2 DAYS LONGER THAN APPLIED RECENTLY. THIS ALLOWS

FOR MORE AMPLITUDE OF THE ANTICIPATED HIGHLIGHTS TO BE MAINTAINED

LONGER. ALTHOUGH A STRAIGHT MODEL BLEND OF ABOUT 50/50 18Z GFS/12Z

ECMWF WAS USED TO BEGIN DAY 3...BEFORE TRANSITIONING TO

40/40/10/10 18Z GFS/12Z ECMWF/18Z GEFS MEAN/12Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE

MEANS FOR DAY 4...WITH ABOUT 1/4 OF EACH MODEL FOR DAYS 5-7...THE

LOW ENTERING THE TN VALLEY ON DAY 3 IS PLAGUED BY CONCERNS WITH

THE 12Z ECMWF WHICH IS A BIT SLOWER AND ULTIMATELY MORE SOUTHWARD

CROSSING THE APPALACHIANS COMPARED WITH MOST OTHER

SOLUTIONS...WHICH HAS HUGE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRECIPITATION

ALONG THE EAST COAST DAYS 4/5. TRACING THE LOW TO ITS PRESENT

LOCATION OVER THE EASTERN PACIFIC SHOWS THE ECMWF TO BE A BIT SLOW

INITIALLY WHICH MAY HAVE TO DO WITH ITS OLDER INITIALIZATION AND

GREATER RELIANCE UPON PRIOR FIRST GUESS FIELDS VERSUS THE GFS

WHICH IS MORE RECENT AND OFTEN MORE SENSITIVE TO SUBTLE SHIFTS IN

OBSERVATIONS. THUS...THE SYSTEM IN THE EAST IS NUDGED MOSTLY

TOWARD THE 18Z GFS WITH SOME INCORPORATION OF THE ENSEMBLE MEANS

AND A LITTLE ECMWF TO ACCOUNT FOR THE SPREAD. THE MORE EVENLY

DISTRIBUTED MODEL BLEND SERVES WELL FOR THE REST OF THE CONUS AS

THE SYSTEMS ARE SLIGHTLY SMALLER WITH TYPICAL TIMING DIFFERENCES

BEST ADDRESSED WITH THE BLENDING OF NUMEROUS SOLUTIONS. THE

PREFERENCE FOR THE LARGE TROUGH NEARING THE WEST COAST AROUND DAY

7 IS NEAR THE CONSENSUS WITH ABOUT AVERAGE CONFIDENCE GIVING THE

GROWING SPREAD...WITH ABOUT 60 PERCENT OF THE ENSEMBLES USED BY

THIS TIME.

JAMES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a gut feeling here, and PennMan, you can remove this if it doesn't belong or is out of line.

 

I think that, despite some movement on the individual models, the LSV is in for something quite special. It seems that whether we're seeing a tight northwest gradient, a jog south/north, etc. The one truly consistent feature has been the I-81 corridor from, say Winchester VA to Harrisburg PA getting pounded.

 

Whether the jackpot area expands or contracts, the models haven't seem to have given up on the idea of a PA Turnpike and south blitzkrieg...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...