mitchnick Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 The surface Low barely moves to the east/ne and rots off NJ. Just incredible. Not something rotting off NJ, the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Area wide of 16" to 20" snow depth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 This run was a step towards EURO @ H5....Sucks for me up in Philly, but this is amazing for you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCWeatherGuy Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 114hr Those of us in DC proper may not see a run this good for 20 years. This is the stuff of legends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 The GFS does funny things with precip. The don't really match up well with what's going on in the mid/upper levels. A SLP/h5 progression and track like that will definitely not be that dry on the west side in reality. Unless there's some sort of convective robbing stuff going on offshore. Which is possible of course but this was a great look on the gfs. Well that changed quick! Wow what a huge backdoor add-on as the system pulls away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurojosh Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 USA_ASNOWIPER_sfc_105.gif Why is the total snowdepth map on IWM so different from the total snowfall map (~.5) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Best news of the day Bob Chill! No need to even look at the surface with this map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expat Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Which should we be looking at? Sfc snow depth or snowfall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T. August Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Which should we be looking at? Sfc snow depth or snowfall? Snowfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 The surface Low barely moves to the east/ne and rots off NJ. Just incredible. Not something rotting off NJ, the storm. Dude, this is just insane. I mean serious weather porn. Full capture and 2 contour closed low. Back side would be dynamic as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ers-wxman1 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 USA_ASNOWIPER_sfc_105.gif Awesome!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 What a foot is not good enough? I'm not complaining lol, I would have killed for a foot 6 days ago, but I want the 20-30s as much as the next guy . The duration of this thing is just unbelievable to me...We are in the golden age of snowstorms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 No need to even look at the surface with this map Lol- ninja'd! Incredible stuff were seeing. Almost hard to believe honestly. And everything looks the same. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Why is the total snowdepth map on IWM so different from the total snowfall map (~.5) Not sure how the depth is done. Really, should be looking at precip instead of any of the derived snow products anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 I'm not complaining lol, I would have killed for a foot 6 days ago, but I want the 20-30s as much as the next guy . The duration of this thing is just unbelievable to me...We are in the golden age of snowstorms. Philly w o old.t approach 2 ft in this set up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Lol- ninja'd! Incredible stuff were seeing. Almost hard to believe honestly. And everything looks the same. Wow. Funny that we picked the same hour as an example. When the location of that inner contour showed up, I got giddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTRWx Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Not sure how the depth is done. Really, should be looking at precip instead of any of the derived snow products anyway. USA_APCPIPER_sfc_120.gif Good suggestion. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhotoGuy Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Amazing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Well that changed quick! Wow what a huge backdoor add-on as the system pulls away! I still think the western extent and totals are under done given slp track and h5. The comma would be expansive and dynamic. Not just I-95 and east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris87 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 GGEM is silly too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Funny that we picked the same hour as an example. When the location of that inner contour showed up, I got giddy. I'm archiving all this stuff. Every weather geek should be doing the same. Simply amazing upper level progression from start to finish. I may be dead before I see it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 GGEM is silly too Is it still as cold as last run sir? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expat Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 GGEM is silly too Good silly or bad silly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris87 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Is it still as cold as last run sir? hard to tell until better than the B/W plots come out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathercoins Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Here's the CWG post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezweather Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Interesting that the storm sits there offshore on the 126 hour panel. Unreal on what we're about to see with this event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravens94 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 WHOLLY GGEMTotally different then the GFS. warmer again but wetter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Here's the CWG post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/ Wow. That's crazy bullish for Wes. Great write up Wes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wawarriors4 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Wow. That's crazy bullish for Wes. Great write up Wes. Wish I could read, im blocked....GGEM looks ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ltrain Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Amazing... I knew I would be jackpotted at least once. Naptown with 32". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.