Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Continued Winter Banter.


Ericjcrash

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not despite, but because.

Seconded. The moisture tap from this came from the Pacific, and for quite a while-from just about when it blasted through Texas to when it climbed the coast. I think this can definitely be attributed to the El Nino this winter. Not to say this wouldn't have been awesome without the Nino, but it definitely provided some juice, and without it, certain things may not have happened which did happen because of the influence. When a strong La Nina pattern constantly blasts the Midwest and New England next time it happens, you'll know what I mean. 

 

El Nino's don't directly spawn storms in the Lower 48, they provide juice and strength to already existing storms. I'm a much more direct example-Hurricane Patricia might have been a powerful storm in the Pacific before hitting Mexico, but undoubtedly the El Nino made the conditions better for Patricia to strengthen. May's epic rainfall from here through Oklahoma and the Plains directly came from a jet pointed from Mexico for a few weeks. I've never seen rain like what happened here in May and late October (almost 6" of rain in one hour before Halloween and over 20" of rain in May 2015), as well as tornado/severe activity. California has thankfully received benefits from El Nino-enhanced storms, and a jet influenced by the El Nino to aim storms their way. Don't think of El Nino as a causer, it's more of an influencer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pacific is still by far the largest body of water on Earth, and when heat is redistributed in that body of water, meaning MUCH more energy for storms east of where they normally are, and to be added to the atmosphere, that will have repercussions across the entire planet. Especially in a borderline record Nino such as this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26.8 inhes WTF - I feel like I was kicked in the groin.
At 7PM there was 25.1 inches, there had to be more than 1.8 inches after 7PM just check the F'n radars from 7-9, there had to be at least 3 inches. Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!! It never F'n ends, I can't take it.

Biggest Snowstorms All Time
Central Park in NYC
(through Jan 22, 2016)
Ranking Amount Year & Date(s)
1     26.9 February 11-12, 2006
2     26.8 January 23, 2016
3     25.8 December 26-27, 1947
4     21.0 March 12-14, 1888
5     20.9 February 25-26, 2010
6     20.2 January 7-8, 1996
7     20.0 December 26-27, 2010
8     19.8 February 16-17, 2003
9     19.0 January 26-27, 2011
10   18.1 March 7-8, 1941
11   18.0 December 26, 1872
12   17.7 February 5-7, 1978
13   17.6 February 11-12, 1983
14   17.5 January 22-24, 1935
15   17.5 February 4-7, 1920
16   17.4 February 3-4, 1961
17   16.0 December 19-20, 1948
18   16.0 February 12-13, 1899
19   15.3 February 9-10, 1969
20   15.2 December 11-12, 1960

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26.8 inhes WTF - I feel like I was kicked in the groin.

At 7PM there was 25.1 inches, there had to be more than 1.8 inches after 7PM just check the F'n radars from 7-9, there had to be at least 3 inches. Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!! It never F'n ends, I can't take it.

Biggest Snowstorms All Time

Central Park in NYC

(through Jan 22, 2016)

Ranking Amount Year & Date(s)

1 26.9 February 11-12, 2006

2 26.8 January 23, 2016

3 25.8 December 26-27, 1947

4 21.0 March 12-14, 1888

5 20.9 February 25-26, 2010

6 20.2 January 7-8, 1996

7 20.0 December 26-27, 2010

8 19.8 February 16-17, 2003

9 19.0 January 26-27, 2011

10 18.1 March 7-8, 1941

11 18.0 December 26, 1872

12 17.7 February 5-7, 1978

13 17.6 February 11-12, 1983

14 17.5 January 22-24, 1935

15 17.5 February 4-7, 1920

16 17.4 February 3-4, 1961

17 16.0 December 19-20, 1948

18 16.0 February 12-13, 1899

19 15.3 February 9-10, 1969

20 15.2 December 11-12, 1960

All good that 2006 storm was weak. The CCB sat right over the park for hours. It wasn't indicative of the rest of the area

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS, EURO,GGEM, all have next weeks storm now, however they're OTS... NAVGEM/UKIE are big hits area wide..something to watch atleast

Trough alignment and lack of -ao supports a coastal scraper or ots. Only way to get a bigger storm is for a perfectly placed northern vort phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you're looking for another big event like this it's very unlikely...we could get some more snow but I doubt this will happen again this year...if we get another very negative period for the arctic oscillation we could see another big event...I think it's on to thawing a bit before the next chance comes around...I think the end of the week chance is a slim one at best..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awesome storm. I hope this made everyone less on edge about the winter.

I hope the next storm includes our far NW burbs posters.

 

Yup good stuff for sure but I still need at least two more just like it to hit my annual average.

 

That would mean you guys get rain and turn everything into huge piles of mush.  I mean, I'm ok with that but... :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doorman will be quiet for a while. Anyways when will we find out about the final snow total for KNYC?

I doubt it will be revised, NWS confirmed the total a few hours ago on twitter:

 

Well, Central Park had 26.8" of snow but it wasn't quite the biggest snowstorm on record. #winterstorm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was sure we'd break the record, but we basically tied it.

Looks like the highest official totals in the city were all within a few inches of Central Park's total, so i assume we actualy didnt break the record. JFK, Port Richmond, and Williamsburg were the only official totals that were around 30.

Awesome storm...still bullcrap though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this mornings snow depth was 22" in Central Park and 27" at LGA...JFK 28"...maybe the measurement was right...

 

I would certainly say the Conservancy did a much better job than the Central Park Zoo would have done with this storm. I would guess if the Zoo was still in charge the final total would have been about 22. My only beef is they measured 25.1 inches at 7pm and Newark and Laguardia had totals of 25.5 and 24.5 at the same time. Those two ended with 27.9 and 28.1 inches. It is unlikely that Central Park which is geographically right in between the two, 5 miles or so on either side, that there was that big a discrepancy after 7pm. Otherwise a nice job by the Conservancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...