Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Jan 22-23 East Coast Storm Discussion


Wow

Recommended Posts

Hey guys! Long time no see for a lot of you (from an old Greenville, SC resident and UNCA alum),

 

I thought I'd let you guys know that I shifted my HRRR graphical output to KCLT so I could see how the higher resolution guidance performs for the incoming winter storm! I did this a few times last year when there was significant winter weather.

 

URL: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/hrrr.php#flt

 

 

KCLT.gif

 

These graphics should update hourly with 15 minute time step 2m temps, 10m winds, 1km reflectivity, and IR brightness temperature. And there is an looper that puts all the variables together so you can easily toggle back and forth. 

 

In addition, I've also created a frontogenesis diagnostic graphic which could be especially useful to figure out where the strongest banding occurs as the heavier precip moves in. You can look at 925, 850, 700 frontogenesis or look at them all together with reflectivity. Temperature contours are also overlaid. 

 

These miller-B events with significant CAD always got me excited to track, and as usual, the cold air damming signature has only become more impressive from run to run over the last 2-3 days. This certainly looks to be a major storm for SC upstate and WNC mountains to midlands. Sad I won't get to join the fun with all of you being too far north, but will be happy to live vicariously through you all :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1 and only call for my NC friends. Honestly haven't had a chance to look at much in GA/SC other than there will be crippling ice in that transition area south of Charlotte and then up into southeastern NC.

 

Snow/sleet totals

Asheville 10 - 14

Boone 18-24 inches

Hickory 10 - 14

Greensboro 8-12

Charlotte 3 - 5 

Raleigh 3-6

 

ZR totals

Greensboro - trace

Charlotte - .25 more south of town

Raleigh .5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's my first real major winter storm since leaving N.C. 2 winters ago. It has been a pleasure tracking it with all of you. Given my unbiased perch, I've tried to temper expectation and "keep it real" this week. But, alas, there is no fighting it -- all of my peeps in the I-85/U.S. 74 corridor are going to get clobbered. I like CLT to GSP for 4-6 with .25 of ice. I like Shelby and Rutherford (keep it strong, strongwx!) for 6-12 with some ice in Shelby, but just sleet in Rutherfordton. And I like QueenCityWx and HKYWx to rake with 12-16.

Best of luck to all - I am insanely jealous. Don't forget to create your own transition zone from tracking OBS virtually, to recording them in person! If I have a regret from my snow tracking it's that I didn't spend enough time outside before and during.

I hope everyone else busts with even higher totals. GOOD LUCK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys! Long time no see for a lot of you (from an old Greenville, SC resident and UNCA alum),

 

I thought I'd let you guys know that I shifted my HRRR graphical output to KCLT so I could see how the higher resolution guidance performs for the incoming winter storm! I did this a few times last year when there was significant winter weather.

 

URL: http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/hrrr.php#flt

 

 

 

 

These graphics should update hourly with 15 minute time step 2m temps, 10m winds, 1km reflectivity, and IR brightness temperature. And there is an looper that puts all the variables together so you can easily toggle back and forth. 

 

In addition, I've also created a frontogenesis diagnostic graphic which could be especially useful to figure out where the strongest banding occurs as the heavier precip moves in. You can look at 925, 850, 700 frontogenesis or look at them all together with reflectivity. Temperature contours are also overlaid. 

 

These miller-B events with significant CAD always got me excited to track, and as usual, the cold air damming signature has only become more impressive from run to run over the last 2-3 days. This certainly looks to be a major storm for SC upstate and WNC mountains to midlands. Sad I won't get to join the fun with all of you being too far north, but will be happy to live vicariously through you all :)

Thanks Phil!  Always nice to see you stop by  :wub: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I apologize if this is banter but at what point should we worry about power outages? If we get .25 I'm assuming that's ok but once you reach .50 it's not good. Is there a map of the horrible ice storm we had in 2002 in Central NC?

 

It depends a great deal on the amount of wind.

 

large.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Phil. Still got them booked marked from last year!

Hey guys! Long time no see for a lot of you (from an old Greenville, SC resident and UNCA alum),

I thought I'd let you guys know that I shifted my HRRR graphical output to KCLT so I could see how the higher resolution guidance performs for the incoming winter storm! I did this a few times last year when there was significant winter weather.

These miller-B events with significant CAD always got me excited to track, and as usual, the cold air damming signature has only become more impressive from run to run over the last 2-3 days. This certainly looks to be a major storm for SC upstate and WNC mountains to midlands. Sad I won't get to join the fun with all of you being too far north, but will be happy to live vicariously through you all :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The convection in the northern gulf perpendicular of the main band convection moving through LA is a little concerning. Could rob some upstream moisture. Need that convection to merge with the main line of storms.

There's a thing where the convection races ahead and kills the moisture flux. And then there's another version where it's slow moving and actually enhances it. Not sure which this one is, if either.

But I agree, we should stick a pin in it. It's certainly one of the many ways big SE winter storms head to the graveyard early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

COBB output for GSO from the 18z GFS just came out.  This needs to be posted for posterity:

StnID: kgso    Profile Thermal Adjust:  0.0       Cloud RH threshold:  85%    Average Hourly Sounding: NO

 Date/hour    FHr  Wind    SfcT   Ptype   SR |Snow||Sleet|| FZRA|| QPF    CumSR|TotSN||TotPL||TotZR|| TQPF   S%| I%| L%
============================================================================================================================
160121/2100Z   3  04003KT  39.6F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
160122/0000Z   6  07004KT  27.0F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
160122/0300Z   9  08005KT  25.8F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
160122/0600Z  12  09004KT  26.3F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
160122/0900Z  15  08006KT  26.1F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
160122/1200Z  18  05009KT  22.2F  SNOW   14:1| 2.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.196   14:1|  2.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.20  100|  0|  0
160122/1500Z  21  06008KT  22.2F  SNOW    9:1| 3.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.343   11:1|  5.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.54  100|  0|  0
160122/1800Z  24  05010KT  23.4F  SNOW    8:1| 2.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.281   10:1|  8.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.82  100|  0|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
160122/2100Z  27  06016KT  23.8F  SNOW   11:1| 4.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.426   10:1| 13.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 1.25  100|  0|  0
160123/0000Z  30  36010KT  26.7F  SNOW   10:1| 6.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.644   10:1| 19.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 1.89  100|  0|  0
160123/0300Z  33  04016KT  26.0F  ZLSG    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.21|| 0.201   10:1| 19.5|| 0.00|| 0.21|| 2.09    0| 12| 88
160123/0600Z  36  02009KT  25.4F  FZDZ    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.03|| 0.025   10:1| 19.5|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.12    0|  0|100
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
160123/0900Z  39  03014KT  27.8F  SNOW   10:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.023   10:1| 19.7|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.14  100|  0|  0
160123/1200Z  42  36010KT  28.8F  SNOW    8:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.022   10:1| 19.9|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.16  100|  0|  0
160123/1500Z  45  35010KT  30.5F  SNOW   13:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.028   10:1| 20.3|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.19  100|  0|  0
160123/1800Z  48  33009KT  32.1F  SNOW    7:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.049   10:1| 20.6|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.24  100|  0|  0
----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---
160123/2100Z  51  32010KT  32.3F  RASN    0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013   10:1| 20.6|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.25   88|  0| 12
160124/0000Z  54  33010KT  29.0F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000   10:1| 20.6|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.25    0|  0|  0
160124/0300Z  57  33012KT  29.6F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000   10:1| 20.6|| 0.00|| 0.24|| 2.25    0|  0|  0
160124/0600Z  60  33010KT  27.4F          0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000    0:1|  0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00    0|  0|  0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a thing where the convection races ahead and kills the moisture flux. And then there's another version where it's slow moving and actually enhances it. Not sure which this one is, if either.

But I agree, we should stick a pin in it. It's certainly one of the many ways big SE winter storms head to the graveyard early.

 

If it's oriented Parallel to the main boundary then it should enhance upstream moisture.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a thing where the convection races ahead and kills the moisture flux. And then there's another version where it's slow moving and actually enhances it. Not sure which this one is, if either.

But I agree, we should stick a pin in it. It's certainly one of the many ways big SE winter storms head to the graveyard early.

We want the convection to line up SW to NE that way it acts as a conveyer belt to transport moisture in. If he lines up west to east we are boned as it will Rob our precious qpf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...