IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 This is 6 hour snow ending on 12z Saturday, so basically nothing has fallen up to this point which is near dawn This is the core of deformation banding peaking Saturday night And this is as everything begins to pull out on Sunday morning. Should be over by sunrise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Wiggum Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 We're at the range where the OP's are becoming more useful than the ensembles. I'm not saying they should be ignored, but the mean is still 4-6" which really isn't bad at this range. Ensembles aren't going to pick up things like mesoscale banding.^^^this. Think generally speaking ens long range, op models when in their wheelhouse. If used properly, guidance is a wonderful tool :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 This is 6 hour snow ending on 12z Saturday, so basically nothing has fallen up to this point which is near dawn This is the core of deformation banding peaking Saturday night And this is as everything begins to pull out on Sunday morning. Should be over by sunrise. You didn't show between 12z Sat and 00z Sunday... u missed a 12 hour window! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 There are some insane rates on Saturday morning from DC to Philly. Over 1" per hour over a large swath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Confluences looks to be moving quicker on the nam IMO... Yanks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drz1111 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 last year storm there was no doubt it would be 100% snow it was just a matter of where the heavier snow would set up.. with this storm there is some doubt if mixing happens... We're not mixing in the city, rapidly deepening low pressure and the resulting ageosteophic flow will take care of that. If we mix, that means we've already gotten a ****ton of snow and we're (briefly) dry slotted. That happened in 1996. It's not a bad thing, it means the low is tucked in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Nams really digging and amped In Tx a bit slower again.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 You didn't show between 12z Sat and 00z Sunday... u missed a 12 hour window! All I was showing you was the timing of when things will start, when they peak and when they wrap up. Here is when Long Island gets hit the hardest Then the band pivots to the north and then northwest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 It was similiar on the 0z run and then it continued on the 6z run. We have already been burned this winter by the ensembles. I posted in the pa thread that for several runs the last few days the eps ggem and gfs ensembles have been south with a 40% camp being very south, even missing dc with most snow. There is obviously a trend of the higher res ops favoring a more amped solution then their ens because it's several runs on all 3. I wish someone with more knowledge then me on what that might mean would discuss. Weather the higher resolution ops are more likely on to this or going overboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chietanen Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 ^^^this. Think generally speaking ens long range, op models when in their wheelhouse. If used properly, guidance is a wonderful tool :-) Someone posted a forecast discussion in the NE forum that theorized the OP runs may be better at picking up higher SST's and baroclinicity along the coast than the ensembles due to their higher resolution. Certainly something to watch moving forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 We're not mixing in the city, rapidly deepening low pressure and the resulting ageosteophic flow will take care of that. If we mix, that means we've already gotten a ****ton of snow and we're (briefly) dry slotted. That happened in 1996. It's not a bad thing, it means the low is tucked in. I mixed in 96' and had over 30" of snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Also, see the BOX AFD. They argue that the lower-res ensembles are too far south because they can't see the impact of anomalously warm SSTs. that's what I was looking for thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Nams already a decent shift north and slower, might give heights the time it needs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Def more amped than 06z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 This is going to be warmer overall vs 1996 and 2003. IIRC, temps started out around 10F before both of those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drz1111 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 before the 96 storm hit you had a incredibly arctic air mass over the region it started snowing here in nyc with temps like 12 degrees and in some places in the single digits. that won't be the case with this storm.. That's not particularly relevant. A strong storm with the wrong pattern will advect warm air into the coldest of air masses. It's more a question of wind direction, and a rapidly deepening storm off shore will cause the winds to back. Also, that touch of confluence up in eastern Canada is helping us because it is creating higher pressures in the source region for our cold. We need that. If you mix, in the city, it is likely because you've gotten the full force of the WAA snow and the CCB is lurking just to your west waiting to crawl through as the storm stalls and inches off the to ENE. This isn't like 1/2000 where the storm is progressive so all you get is the WAA thump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 This is going to be warmer overall vs 1996 and 2003. IIRC, temps started out around 10F before both of those. Both had Arctic masses to play with, not this one however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYStorm Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 I know the NWS does this, but I think it's stupid / patronizing. They assume the public can't understand the actual forecast so they make up a fake one with the least chance of verifying. IIRC the research on this shows that the public can understand a more accurate forecast. What they're doing is CYA - forecasting to avoid a fiasco - rather than presenting the public with the best information for people to make independent judgments about preparation. Are you sure that they're just not factoring in the 0z Euro's scenario and weighting a bit heavier and combining it with the GFS's consistency (if you want to call it that)? I think given the fact that we're 48-72 hourse out and the whole idea of forecasting totals is not exactly completely objective to begin with ... it's not a bad call. You don't want to create panic by issuing a forecast of 12"-24" if you are not confident enough that it could verify yet ... and you don't want to assume the Euro is correct and the totals will be dramatically lower due to a more southern track or mixing either. At 48-72 hours, they HAVE to say SOMETHING. What would you have recommended if you were running NWS at Upton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 2003 was colder, single digits, but 1996 was plenty cold too. Didn't waste a flake. This one is much warmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 All I was showing you was the timing of when things will start, when they peak and when they wrap up. Here is when Long Island gets hit the hardest Then the band pivots to the north and then northwest OK now I understand where you were coming from.... I thought you left it by mistake. Sorry about that... so basically it shows 12-18 on average throughout the entire area. Correct?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe4alb Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 I don't care how cold it is. If the winds are SE, E or even ENE, eastern and southern sections of LI are in for some mixing for sure. I have see storms start at 5 - 10F and rain within a few hrs of the storm starting. The column can warm incredibly fast especially if you are dealing with warming SST. Keep an eye on the wind direction. Also (as it was pointed out by NWS) model forecasts usually underestimate the northerly backing winds for storms that are near the BM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemost Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Def more amped than 06z out to 39, looks like the trough is going even more negative than 06z, should be a good sign considering the slower evolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Here's the issue. There's a warm tongue somewhere around 850mb, and it's hard to decipher without looking at the entire sounding. The good news is that the warm layer appears temporary so anyone that changes over should go back to snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 If you want to know where the heaviest banding occurs, look at the darker reds that extend from Long Island, over the city and into NJ That then shifts to just NW of the city Everything then pulls East as the low departs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Here's the issue. There's a warm tongue somewhere around 850mb, and it's hard to decipher without looking at the entire sounding. The good news is that the warm layer appears temporary so anyone that changes over should go back to snow. The 850s crash when the mod-heavy precip begins. The bigger concern is when the low occludes, and how long it has to drag warm air in, and also whether Long Island has to deal with nonideal ENE winds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiehardFF Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Have not posted in awhile.. been lurking. Really pumped for this. Could be a HECS for us up here or just a MECS. I believe the EURO will shift again at 12z. At least now full sampling has begun. NAM looks good so far but when doesn't it during the winter season lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 If you want to know where the heaviest banding occurs, look at the darker reds that extend from Long Island, over the city and into NJ That then shifts to just NW of the city Everything then pulls East as the low departs Textbook 700mb CCB. There's going to be some awesome snow growth under those bands. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 The 850s crash when the mod-heavy precip begins. The bigger concern is when the low occludes, and how long it has to drag warm air in, and also whether Long Island has to deal with nonideal ENE winds. Long Island has a very hard time keeping all snow when the winds aren't out of the North or the Northeast. With this storm, the winds could even be out of the Southeast for awhile, especially on the East end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 NAMS gonna be huge, look out jersey and metro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 NAMS gonna be huge, look out jersey and metroYes it is... Hr 54 is pornSent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.