Bob Chill Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Definitely not sold on any lengthy warm spell given the southern jet is raging and looks to stay that way. We're just sitting in the left exit region as well for the last few days so that could certainly be stormy. tho HM just posted "late Jan into early Feb looking warm" Above normal on the means seems pretty likely but not worth picking over too much. At least it doesn't look like we're warm for the bad reasons. You can see the mean 850 line creeping south through the end of the EPS. Basically tappable cold air nearby. I'm ready for some southern storm tracks and not all this convoluted stuff. Rain, whiff, or snow...let's get into the prime nino climo pattern and see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 18z GFS looks weird @ 108 out near the Pacific, it doesn't have the same wave like the 12z did, so idk what it is going to show down the line here but I gtg so cya @ 00z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Weeklies first look: Cold week one. Week 2-4 warm. -4, +2, +3, +3 for DC. +4 or greater northern states wk 2-4. Pretty good +NAO wks 2-4 (no real sign of -AO either but more neutral maybe), STJ seems to calm a little bit with time. Flat 500mb ridge across S/C Canada, bunches up a bit in middle wk 3. Well above avg precip wk 1 central CA to Pac NW, diminishes to avg over following weeks. Wk 2-4 above avg mainly over S/SE states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIC_WX Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Weeklies first look: Cold week one. Week 2-4 warm. -4, +2, +3, +3 for DC. +4 or greater northern states wk 2-4. Pretty good +NAO wks 2-4 (no real sign of -AO either but more neutral maybe), STJ seems to calm a little bit with time. Flat 500mb ridge across S/C Canada, bunches up a bit in middle wk 3. Well above avg precip wk 1 central CA to Pac NW, diminishes to avg over following weeks. Wk 2-4 above avg mainly over S/SE states. With supernino climo outperforming the models so far this season, do you really trust this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 With supernino climo outperforming the models so far this season, do you really trust this? That outlook sounds very Nino-ish to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Some key differences from 12z like, the troff hardly exists at 168, going to be way east if it forms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deck Pic Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Do you mean 12z? Para Euro generally has come out 5-6 hours after the operational.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 That outlook sounds very Nino-ish to me. It is. The clusters are interestingly pretty evenly split after this week between mega torch and near or just below normal. Every week has a big cluster with +7 to +10 anomalies over a huge part of the northeast quad of the US. Sounds about right. Even today we managed a +10 for the high out of nowhere. But if we keep storms rolling it probably won't last long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacintoshPro Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Looks like the 18z drops the d8-9 threat. The 18z GFS certainly doesn't drop the threat, although its east of the 12z. Its very close to a significant storm for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 http://www.instantweathermaps.com/GFS-php/showmap-conussfc.php?run=2016011418&time=PER&var=ASNOWI&hour=213 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 You're wrong. Looks to go to our south by a small distance. People need to learn to read a model before they post. Ugh Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmericanWxFreak Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Looks like the 18z drops the d8-9 threat. lol not quite... maybe drops the direct hit, but far from dropping it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 People need to learn to read a model before they post. Ugh Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I'm actually interested in this one as I think the euro is wrong, its ensemble mean look pretty good so there must be quite a few good members. Still may not work out and after it I think we have 4 warmish days but......we got a better shot than we had for this Sunday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 People need to learn to read a model before they post. Ugh Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Instead of having the desire to be first, people should focus on the need to be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 It's a swing and a miss for us.It's a scrapper. At 9 days, that's not "dropping the threat." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIC_WX Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 That outlook sounds very Nino-ish to me. Sounds more like December to me. The range takes us into mid February, which would otherwise be prime time for a nino induced snowfall which isn't likely with ++ temps anywhere close by. I thought DC snow climo was most hospitable in February and particularly so in the case of ninos. I am not sold on anything happening in January beyond what we've already seen, so if we are writing off the first half of February there isn't much left to hang a hat on this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I think you got your point across a long time ago. Apparently not since it has to be repeated every model run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windman18 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 So the para was too close and the regular was a tad too far, split the difference and we've got a snowstorm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I think you got your point across a long time ago. And apparently, you're still getting yours across. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 as always i take a suppressed solution much more favorably at this range than a lakes cutter Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 At least it misses to our south. I can't stand a cutter after 4 days of below average temps, I'd rather get no snow from an OTS track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Sounds more like December to me. The range takes us into mid February, which would otherwise be prime time for a nino induced snowfall which isn't likely with ++ temps anywhere close by. I thought DC snow climo was most hospitable in February and particularly so in the case of ninos. I am not sold on anything happening in January beyond what we've already seen, so if we are writing off the first half of February there isn't much left to hang a hat on this year. Well I've mentioned a number of times that strong Nino climo favors south of us more than us for + snow and the ridging across Canada is part of the reason. It's not really a Dec pattern in the means. That was a high centered over the lakes/northeast this is more a broad flat ridge near and north of the international border. Tho the clusters do feature more of a lakes centering in some. Either way the STJ signal is stronger than Dec as you'd expect. People may have just faltered on the idea of a negative Feb for temps. For now I'd prob still lean near normal myself tho plus seems more likely than minus for the month based on guidance. The euro monthlies kind of eased things in Feb too and cranked them back up in Mar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Way too much attention being paid to op runs. The only problem is saw with 18z was a weaker wave. Too weak + too much confluence = south. But I would say that's probably the lowest concern right now. The same general idea is still front and center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WEATHER53 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 At least it misses to our south. I can't stand a cutter after 4 days of below average temps, I'd rather get no snow from an OTS track. When they are too far to our south that is the 2nd best problem we can have as it becomes an in situation with the high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Way too much attention being paid to op runs. The only problem is saw with 18z was a weaker wave. Too weak + too much confluence = south. But I would say that's probably the lowest concern right now. The same general idea is still front and center. I just liked the idea it had a storm in that timeframe. And it's cold. And a few runs now. We are batting 1000 right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTWXRISK Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 LETS MONGER !! ** ABOUT JAN 22-23 ** *INFORMED DISCUSSION / SPECULATION** POINT #1 This system for JAN 22-23 has been showing up on the various long range weather models for several days. As we all know by now an Arctic outbreak is headed for the Midwest and the East Coast which arrives on Sunday and stays in place for most of next week. This arctic air mass is a critical difference between the system for January 22-23 and the previous weather systems over the last 10 days which at point LOOKED like they MIGHT bring some sort of winter weather to portions of the East Coast . If you go back and take a look at most of the significant East Coast winter storms over the past 70 years... most of feature arctic or semi Arctic air in place BEFORE the storm actually began. Occasionally there will be some situations of rain changing the snow or the cold air arriving "just in the nick of time" but for the most part the vast majority of significant East Coast winter storms have occurred when the Arctic air is in place BEFORE the event ever begins. POINT # 2 this system... no matter if it actually RAIN or SNOW ... appears to be a classic GULF / East Coast LOW MILLER A TYPE). These sorts of LOWs are much more favorable for significant winter weather across portions of NV VA WVA MD DEL as well as into se PA and NJ POINT #3 the second critical issue or variable with regard to this possible JAN 22-23... is the ** TIMING *** As impressive as the cold air is next week ... it is not going to last forever. The Southern System coming out of Texas and the Gulf coast will have to arrive in time so the cold air is still in place over the Middle Atlantic states. This FIRST image is the operational or **regular ** European model from Thursday afternoon. As you can see it shows a rain storm for the entire East Coast for January 23-24. The reason for this has to do with the upper air pattern. The regular European model slows as this LOW down by over developing it in the upper levels the atmosphere into what is called a *** CUTOFF LOW***. These sorts a systems move very slowly and as a result by the time the southern LOW reaches the Carolina Coast.... all the cold air is gone and the rain snow line is north of Albany in Northern New York State and over Northern New England! However lets looks at IMAGE #2 shows the European ENSEMBLE from this Thursday afternoons model run. As you can see it has a **vastly** different setup and shows a major snowstorm underway across portions of the Ohio Valley... the Tennessee Valley ...all the middle Atlantic... and a good portion of New England JAN 22-23. The difference here is NUMBER #3 that the European Ensemble does NOT slow the southern LOW down. The Low keeps moving which means that it arrives when the cold air is still in place across the East Coast ---and that results in a major snowstorm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Reilly Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 So the para was too close and the regular was a tad too far, split the difference and we've got a snowstorm. Lol I tried tobdo that also with our current situation this weekend...we did split the difference one storm rain the other supression Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTWXRISK Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 also the fact that the 18z GFS has jumped into bed with the euro eps is often a good sign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtk Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 i have no idea why or what the changes are on it but when I've looked at the gfsx it has shown some crazy solutions at range. Not just over amped but weird convective precip bands that seem to throw the whole system off. It just feels funky to me sometimes. Like a nam type feel. Can't put my finger on it but I don't like the feel of that model so far. I think this is more imagined than reality since there are almost no changes to the model itself in the GFSx (it's a DA package, with a small change to some land surface stuff to address a 2m T/Td bias and perhaps one other very minor change to a reference pressure in the SL scheme or something). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 That high on the EPS over the lakes is somewhat encouraging. Means less chance of a cutter and the cold air is not just on the front end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.