40/70 Benchmark Posted January 16, 2016 Author Share Posted January 16, 2016 33.9/31 Ready for my cosmic dildo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NoPoles Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 On 1/16/2016 at 4:56 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: 33.9/31 Ready for my cosmic dildo. Can't escape the big green weenie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 On 1/15/2016 at 8:46 PM, dendrite said: My max potential on the previous maps was only 3". Now my likely is 4-6"... I'm not really feeling these min/likely/max maps so far...no offense to our NWS members here. Preaching to the choir. They are definitely still slavish to model variability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Quick check of the 00z raobs vs. some of the higher res guidance. HRRR, seems too warm across the board. It's not much, 0.5 to 1 degree, but especially down by the source of the warm air it's nearly 2 degrees too warm at 925. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 NAM isn't awful, maybe too cold in the N and E, and too warm in the S and W. The best match might be the RGEM though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 I know a couple people who would bang this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 On 1/16/2016 at 4:48 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Terrible.Hmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.