Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Christmas Storm III


Cold Rain

Recommended Posts

So my thoughts remain unchanged at this time except for slower timing as I said before 18z GFS was somewhat of an improvement but as mentioned the s/w gets sheared out by an agressive northern stream. I suppose this isn't impossible but I am hoping unlikely. Even still the GFS was in the right direction with the low and quick hitter with a little snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Thanks. Trust me, it's not that me and sean think we're badasses now but these threads will NOT go down the same road we went down last year.

Don't worry......we are in agreement with you. The temporary Mods are doing a wonderful job at keeping things on track. Kudos to you and all the Mods....... Now, back to model watching....

:snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow really? Eric Thomas usually is a local met I have some respect for. He called the 2004 storm about 4 days early and he was right on. I'm surprised he's not on board yet. Well, truly I won't be comfortable until the GFS gives in. Hopefully by tomorrow we'll have a general model consensus; not perfect but general.

wouldnt that be a "safe" call as a broadcast guy? Wouldnt it be easier to up totals later in the week, than to predict huge totals now, then back off? Makes sense to this layman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the past several years, I have used paint to make "call" maps on occasion. This year, I am trying something new and using powerpoint. After I got the hang of it, it went pretty quickly. Not even going to go after amounts at this stage, just % chance of seeing accumulating sn atm and trying to nail down slp placement. Should of thrown a 10% and isolated 30% hatch in for TN, but still learning how to blend the boxes and it would have not looked puerty.

post-382-0-79462300-1292976757.jpg

This was based on a blend of the 12z GGEM ens mean, ECMWF ens mean, and GFS ens mean, with respect to surface placement, strength, and timing, with a small lean towards the EC but not much. Chances were also based on these 3 means. Still learning, so if it sucks, tell me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the past several years, I have used paint to make "call" maps on occasion. This year, I am trying something new and using powerpoint. After I got the hang of it, it went pretty quickly. Not even going to go after amounts at this stage, just % chance of seeing accumulating sn atm and trying to nail down slp placement. Should of thrown a 10% and isolated 30% hatch in for TN, but still learning how to blend the boxes and it would have not looked puerty.

post-382-0-79462300-1292976757.jpg

This was based on a blend of the 12z GGEM ens mean, ECMWF ens mean, and GFS ens mean, with respect to surface placement, strength, and timing, with a small lean towards the EC but not much. Chances were also based on these 3 means. Still learning, so if it sucks, tell me...

I like the looks of this outlook with exception of a 10% blob embedded within the 50% over my area ;). I am kidding of course that is a reasonable call at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the past several years, I have used paint to make "call" maps on occasion. This year, I am trying something new and using powerpoint. After I got the hang of it, it went pretty quickly. Not even going to go after amounts at this stage, just % chance of seeing accumulating sn atm and trying to nail down slp placement. Should of thrown a 10% and isolated 30% hatch in for TN, but still learning how to blend the boxes and it would have not looked puerty.

post-382-0-79462300-1292976757.jpg

This was based on a blend of the 12z GGEM ens mean, ECMWF ens mean, and GFS ens mean, with respect to surface placement, strength, and timing, with a small lean towards the EC but not much. Chances were also based on these 3 means. Still learning, so if it sucks, tell me...

Not bad at all for a prelim! I'd take it right now but i'm sure it will be changing in the next 3 days hopefully it all shifts SW :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the past several years, I have used paint to make "call" maps on occasion. This year, I am trying something new and using powerpoint. After I got the hang of it, it went pretty quickly. Not even going to go after amounts at this stage, just % chance of seeing accumulating sn atm and trying to nail down slp placement. Should of thrown a 10% and isolated 30% hatch in for TN, but still learning how to blend the boxes and it would have not looked puerty.

post-382-0-79462300-1292976757.jpg

This was based on a blend of the 12z GGEM ens mean, ECMWF ens mean, and GFS ens mean, with respect to surface placement, strength, and timing, with a small lean towards the EC but not much. Chances were also based on these 3 means. Still learning, so if it sucks, tell me...

That looks very reasonable, given the spread in the models. GA folks are on the line, this far out.. Now if the euro shows the same thursday and friday and the low is 10mb stronger :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

00z will be a huge run. If the GFS comes around at 00z I'll be extremely confident in our chances. Itll be tough for the euro to top what it showed last night though.

Me too, but I'll equate that only to half time in a ball game, being up well in score with everything clicking. The second half will be the modeling performance that takes place after the system reaches California.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well good evening, folks! Now that I am home and can post (thanks, Work, for only taking 2 weeks to block this site. :arrowhead:), I will say that I am not discouraged one bit from the GFS's refusal to show a major snowstorm (although I'm quite sure that the OLD GFS would have thrown us a bone by now). I liked the Euro run, but really, how many times have we seen such a modeled scenario come to pass when modeled from such a long way out? Rarely. I don't expect it to verify in this case either.

Having said that, I would not be surprised one bit by the GFS taking 1 - 2 more days before it shows us anything significant. I would further not be surprised if the Euro lived up to its moniker of Dr. No for a few runs. I am very surprised that it's held onto this solution for 4 straight runs. That simply cannot continue, can it? The perfect phasing of two very poorly sampled shortwaves can't be accurately predicted at this time range, can it?

The Euro gives us a best case scenario. The GFS musters a few flakes. The Ukie deviated and went south. The Canadian backed off it's earlier depictions too. All of this is expected and will continue for a while, given the setup.

I've said from the very beginning, that the most important thing that we have going for us that we haven't in a long, long time (and certainly not around any Christmas that I remember) is that we have all the players on the field AND, AND in the same vicinity for something special to happen.

Don't worry. It will. :snowman::snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the looks of this outlook with exception of a 10% blob embedded within the 50% over my area ;). I am kidding of course that is a reasonable call at this time.

Still learning how to do this crap in pp, which makes for a much better presentation, but only to those who are seasoned in it. :thumbsup: In all seriousness, after looking over all the guidance, I am leaning towards an OTS solution that leaves most of the MA and NE out of it, except for the Cape and N NE. Thinking the phasing may take place a little to late to wrap it up along the EC. Not good news if that happens for those to our north, but the chances of some of these EC op solutions verifying is a 1:50 year event, if not more, as it crushes the SE --> NE. The GFS is still not handling the southern stream like the other models, and it is interesting that that UK is ultra suppressed as NCEP says if the GFS shows phasing between the streams, check the UKMET. Obviously a big disconnect there. An OTS solution would also fit into the climo for SE winter storms in general. Still a lot of time left, but by Thursday night, we should have a firm handle on this one way or another. Looking forward to the show tonight and plan on calling in. :snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

needs to shift west a littlescooter.gif

I thought about that, through western NC and TN, maybe do to some overrunning from Gulf Moisture, but once the coastal picks up, influx is from the ATL, and if the phase happens a little late, like I am currently thinking, we could see a precipitous drop off in E TN and W NC, W SC and N GA too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought about that, through western NC and TN, maybe do to some overrunning from Gulf Moisture, but once the coastal picks up, influx is from the ATL, and if the phase happens a little late, like I am currently thinking, we could see a precipitous drop off in E TN and W NC, W SC and N GA too.

Thx for keeping it real and bringing me back to reality...back to very low expectations now! Look forward to hearing you on the show :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...