Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Recommended Posts

Forecasting is another matter...you don't need much science prowess to succeed in that arena.....but I do understand why they require that people put in the time to and effort into learning how the physics of the atmosphere play out.

It can't hurt to know the intricacies of how all of these atmospheric phenomena manifest themselves, but one can certainly supplement a thorough understanding of climatology, along with a knowledge of the biases/strengths amongst the pantheon of guidance.

That is how I have any clue what so ever......a  life time of observation and good communications skills help, too.

Indeed. Experience is the best teacher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

perhaps you can get those roommates to decipher the new German model description. I got the mountain torque stuff but some of this is a little gibberish like

Abstract

This article describes the non-hydrostatic dynamical core developed for the ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) modelling framework. ICON is a joint project of the German Weather Service (DWD) and the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), targeting a unified modelling system for global numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate modelling. Compared with the existing models at both institutions, the main achievements of ICON are exact local mass conservation, mass-consistent tracer transport, a flexible grid nesting capability and the use of non-hydrostatic equations on global domains. The dynamical core is formulated on an icosahedral-triangular Arakawa C grid. Achieving mass conservation is facilitated by a flux-form continuity equation with density as the prognostic variable. Time integration is performed with a two-time-level predictor–corrector scheme that is fully explicit, except for the terms describing vertical sound-wave propagation. To achieve competitive computational efficiency, time splitting is applied between the dynamical core on the one hand and tracer advection, physics parametrizations and horizontal diffusion on the other hand. A sequence of tests with varying complexity indicates that the ICON dynamical core combines high numerical stability over steep mountain slopes with good accuracy and reasonably low diffusivity. Preliminary NWP test suites initialized with interpolated analysis data reveal that the ICON modelling system already achieves better skill scores than its predecessor at DWD, the operational hydrostatic Global Model Europe (GME), and at the same time requires significantly fewer computational resources.

Yeah, my eyes just sort of glazed over about halfway through that haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cognitive dichotomy is immense....I mean, we're talking legit, learning disability like struggles in relation to the problem solving arena, superimposed over an exceptional ability to communicate/articulate, synthesize and integrate information.

That's what makes there world/this forum tick....everyone has a toolset.

Then there are genetic freaks like Will, who do anything and everything better than you can. :lol:

My toolset consists of sarcasm and bitterness :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With this many pieces on the chess board I would wait for actual sampling and get the data into the models instead of using hypothetical data. One shortwave being stronger or weaker could make a huge difference with this setup. I would be happy with a coating or inch since we are going to miss another opportunity. Stay safe.

For realz? A coating? An inch? Really? Turn the calander to May bro.....ok sorry guys.....I know it's the model mezzanine.....I'm done now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the Canadian... It's a lousy model, but it pretty much sums up this season!! Like Will phrased it-with surgical precision it manages to miss us completely lmao!! Melt away-get it out!!

This will end up falling apart before to much longer. And We will miss the lil event Friday too btw!

Does it embrace the suk as they say? Embrace it fellas.......it rained today folks.....on February 3.....FUKIN FEB 3.....2/3.....that's 2/3......I swear I'm living back home in the SF Bay Area.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm embracing it bro!! Really didn't bother me it rained today at all. It's just amazing to me how so much potential can just not happen...every time this year. It is quite impressive how it just won't snow for most areas this winter. I hope those in southeast areas enjoy this one Friday...most in CT AND Massachusetts will miss out.

We're chasing ghosts this year in SNE and NNE so far. Not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm embracing it bro!! Really didn't bother me it rained today at all. It's just amazing to me how so much potential can just not happen...every time this year. It is quite impressive how it just won't snow for most areas this winter. I hope those in southeast areas enjoy this one Friday...most in CT AND Massachusetts will miss out.

We're chasing ghosts this year in SNE and NNE so far. Not good.

Winter crying for its momma.......wut a little b I t c h

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DAILY HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL DATA
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BURLINGTON VT
735 PM EST WED FEB 3 2016

STATION            PRECIP   TEMPERATURE   PRESENT         SNOW
                   24 HRS   MAX MIN CUR   WEATHER     NEW TOTAL SWE
...VERMONT...
MOUNT MANSFIELD     0.51    38  14  38                0.0  21

Congrats NNE mountains... yesterday's 21" snow depth was the lowest in at least half a century (since 1954) for February 3rd at MMNV1, beating out the 22" in 1982.

 

We are full on ratter at this point...not a melt down, just pure amazement that yes, it can be this bad.  Hopefully banking some karma for future years, ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockport gust to 61 Blue Hill 50

 

Poorly modeled. I'm going back over the data now, and the HRRR had it, but that's it.

 

We hit hurricane force on the buoys last evening. It was definitely something more than mechanical mixing. Possibly a localized jetlet, coupled with the warm front sneaking just far enough north into our area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poorly modeled. I'm going back over the data now, and the HRRR had it, but that's it.

 

We hit hurricane force on the buoys last evening. It was definitely something more than mechanical mixing. Possibly a localized jetlet, coupled with the warm front sneaking just far enough north into our area.

 

We really busted on yesterday evening's wind forecast even back here. Part of it was being too focused on tonight's snow but we mixed way more than I expected on the back edge of that precip shield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poorly modeled. I'm going back over the data now, and the HRRR had it, but that's it.

 

We hit hurricane force on the buoys last evening. It was definitely something more than mechanical mixing. Possibly a localized jetlet, coupled with the warm front sneaking just far enough north into our area.

I thought HRRR had it, right before I left work I could see it on HRRR and then drove right into it. Got crushed with Tstorm force winds and torrential rain, 1.63 rain and probably 1.1 of that in quick order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DAILY HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL DATA
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BURLINGTON VT
735 PM EST WED FEB 3 2016

STATION            PRECIP   TEMPERATURE   PRESENT         SNOW
                   24 HRS   MAX MIN CUR   WEATHER     NEW TOTAL SWE
...VERMONT...
MOUNT MANSFIELD     0.51    38  14  38                0.0  21
Congrats NNE mountains... yesterday's 21" snow depth was the lowest in at least half a century (since 1954) for February 3rd at MMNV1, beating out the 22" in 1982.

 

We are full on ratter at this point...not a melt down, just pure amazement that yes, it can be this bad.  Hopefully banking some karma for future years, ha.

Maybe James can finish the season with 2x Montpelier's totals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...