Ginx snewx Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Rain crushes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Wow this rain is intense. Like a summer t-stormall the way up 395 in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Wind is howling here. KFIT gusting to 33 mph I bet they hit 40 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Wind is howling here. KFIT gusting to 33 mph I bet they hit 40 The wind started blowing and I went from 36 to 50F in about 30 minutes. Sounded like a freight train up high. My sheltered yard got an epic gust of 15mph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 We pour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 We pour.literally minutes after Kev posted the sky opened up, over an inch now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 0.67" looks to be it Shocking. It underperformed. Although the wind and temp spike were impressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 0.83" on the day here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 4, 2016 Author Share Posted February 4, 2016 1.10" Currently 35F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 .56 here as it ends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Pretty benign rains here thus far. 1/4". Winds have gusted close to 40mph though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 .56 here as it ends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Pretty benign rains here thus far. 1/4". Winds have gusted close to 40mph though.something happened in Milton area,down burst maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 .56 here as it ends going out to look at Gauge now,see how it measures up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 i think the early week scenario is trending toward a whole lot of meh, even for eastern areas but at least it will be more seasonable...i want to make roast chicken and stuffing one night and then home made mac and cheese another and dont like to make those dishes when it is sixty or fifty degrees out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codfishsnowman Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 something happened in Milton area,down burst maybe great the wrong kind of severe wx for feb 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 going out to look at Gauge now,see how it measures up1.59 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Some good gusts here at times...heavy rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Digital accumulation is off .6 or so here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ct_yankee Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 interesting shape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I need the dumb down version.......lol Math is the reason I never pursued this academically I'm intelligent in certain ways, but others, not so much. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Math is the reason I never pursued this academically I'm intelligent in certain ways, but others, not so much. lol Math was not my strong suit as well, I always have folks ask why i did not become a Met, The answer lies within............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Math was not my strong suit as well, I always have folks ask why i did not become a Met, The answer lies within............... My cognitive dichotomy is immense....I mean, we're talking legit, learning disability like struggles in relation to the problem solving arena, superimposed over an exceptional ability to communicate/articulate, synthesize and integrate information. That's what makes there world/this forum tick....everyone has a toolset. Then there are genetic freaks like Will, who do anything and everything better than you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 1.59 I find that both radars consistently underestimate totals even with the dual pol. OKX is worse than BOX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 1 Yr ago we were trying to see if we would get screwed by the "relaxation" of the pattern. Then my biggest storm yet came. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 My cognitive dichotomy is immense....I mean, we're talking legit, learning disability like struggles in relation to the problem solving arena, superimposed over an exceptional ability to communicate/articulate, synthesize and integrate information. That's what makes there world/this forum tick....everyone has a toolset. Then there are genetic freaks like Will, who do anything and everything better than you can. My math allergy is so severe I carry an EpiPen at all times. Language comes most easily for me, so I strive to develop and push that skill to its natural limit. Still, as you have demonstrated in your outlooks, it doesn't require a PhD in math to develop a sound conceptual framework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 1 Yr ago we were trying to see if we would get screwed by the "relaxation" of the pattern. Then my biggest storm yet came. Was that the one that dropped 30" or so on your area with the OES contribution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 My math allergy is so severe I carry an EpiPen at all times. Language comes most easily for me, so I strive to develop and push that skill to its natural limit. Still, as you have demonstrated in your outlooks, it doesn't require a PhD in math to develop a sound conceptual framework.perhaps you can get those roommates to decipher the new German model description. I got the mountain torque stuff but some of this is a little gibberish likeAbstract This article describes the non-hydrostatic dynamical core developed for the ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) modelling framework. ICON is a joint project of the German Weather Service (DWD) and the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M), targeting a unified modelling system for global numerical weather prediction (NWP) and climate modelling. Compared with the existing models at both institutions, the main achievements of ICON are exact local mass conservation, mass-consistent tracer transport, a flexible grid nesting capability and the use of non-hydrostatic equations on global domains. The dynamical core is formulated on an icosahedral-triangular Arakawa C grid. Achieving mass conservation is facilitated by a flux-form continuity equation with density as the prognostic variable. Time integration is performed with a two-time-level predictor–corrector scheme that is fully explicit, except for the terms describing vertical sound-wave propagation. To achieve competitive computational efficiency, time splitting is applied between the dynamical core on the one hand and tracer advection, physics parametrizations and horizontal diffusion on the other hand. A sequence of tests with varying complexity indicates that the ICON dynamical core combines high numerical stability over steep mountain slopes with good accuracy and reasonably low diffusivity. Preliminary NWP test suites initialized with interpolated analysis data reveal that the ICON modelling system already achieves better skill scores than its predecessor at DWD, the operational hydrostatic Global Model Europe (GME), and at the same time requires significantly fewer computational resources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 My math allergy is so severe I carry an EpiPen at all times. Language comes most easily for me, so I strive to develop and push that skill to its natural limit. Still, as you have demonstrated in your outlooks, it doesn't require a PhD in math to develop a sound conceptual framework. Forecasting is another matter...you don't need much science prowess to succeed in that arena.....but I do understand why they require that people put in the time to and effort into learning how the physics of the atmosphere play out. It can't hurt to know the intricacies of how all of these atmospheric phenomena manifest themselves, but one can certainly supplement a thorough understanding of climatology, along with a knowledge of the biases/strengths amongst the pantheon of guidance. That is how I have any clue what so ever......a life time of observation and good communication skills help, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Was that the one that dropped 30" or so on your area with the OES contribution? Yeah. It was nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.