WhiteLawns Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Haha I actually have been there this past fall...not a whole lot to do in Monson, Mass except the brewery. Be prepared to stand in line to get anything though, place is blowing up in popularity. Go tour the old Tornado path that's still easily visible on parts of RT 2 between that area and Sturbridge. I arrived in monson about 15 mins after the tornado went through to help with emergency services (im an EMT). They got hit really hard. Seeing that church steeple knocked down really gave you a sense of the power of the storm. Oh and the house that made it to the other side of the road... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgwp96 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I grew up in North Jersey, and though it's been 43 years since I moved to Maine, I think it was the 1960 census in which NJ passed RI as the most densely populated state - Jersey's always had lots of people. However, I don't ever recall stores being stripped pre-storm, and especially none remaining stripped half a week after the last flakes. My years in NJ included 3 storms in the 24" range, 3/56, 3/58, and 2/61, plus about a half dozen in the 15-20" range. That last 2-footer fell atop a 20"+ snowpack and brought depths into the 40s over much of NNJ outside of places within 10-15 miles of NYC, yet we never saw the empty shelves so frequently seen today as a result of big snowstorms. Whether folks kept more non-perishables around, or otherwise prepared better (or whether this is just a "Get off my lawn!" comment), I can't say. Yea stores are never empty and crews were plowing throughout the storm . Hell my wife drove to a local store during the storm .snow stopped Saturday night at 9 pm and the next morning most streets were black top . 96 and 93 where the only storms that really slowed things up for a day otherwise most towns do fine . Inner cities is a different animal since everyone parks and the streets and plows have a single lane to plow and people constantly throw all the snow back on the roads . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteLawns Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Wow it is pouring snow here. what a potent squall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Wow it is pouring snow here. what a potent squall.Windsexy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugarloaf1989 Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Snowing hard at Mohawk Mtn/Cornwall right now per their cam: http://108.162.48.13/view2.cgi?profile=5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Snowing hard at Mohawk Mtn/Cornwall right now per their cam: http://108.162.48.13/view2.cgi?profile=5 dumping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteLawns Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 dumping about what it looked like here. coated the ground in under a minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Pounding here at dxr. Better snow growth then the blizzard. Big fat flakes no wind. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 29, 2016 Author Share Posted January 29, 2016 Pounding here at dxr. Better snow growth then the blizzard. Big fat flakes no wind. Nice. Good "snow growth" meaning large single crystals or aggregates? I'm guessing the latter based on temps down there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 40F on the car thermo. I'll end up with catpaws at best here probably Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 oh i suspect they're real - no doubt. that next sentence said, "...Certainly more than just seems..." i wonder what the straight up numbers show comparing decades... my father spun yarns growing up about apocalyptic snow events in the 1950's and 60's where he grew up in Michigan. i wonder how pervasive that was for that matter... but... 20 to 30" snow events are a particularly unique breed. i don't ...well, i'll leave it at that. but i have a handfull of 24" 's in my life's experiences and all but one happened in the last 10 years. i don't recall my father putting actual snow totals in inches on the big events for last century. could also be a part of global climate change, too... This is my view, but I'll leave it at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 oh i suspect they're real - no doubt. that next sentence said, "...Certainly more than just seems..." i wonder what the straight up numbers show comparing decades... my father spun yarns growing up about apocalyptic snow events in the 1950's and 60's where he grew up in Michigan. i wonder how pervasive that was for that matter... but... 20 to 30" snow events are a particularly unique breed. i don't ...well, i'll leave it at that. but i have a handfull of 24" 's in my life's experiences and all but one happened in the last 10 years. i don't recall my father putting actual snow totals in inches on the big events for last century. could also be a part of global climate change, too... global climate change https://www2.ucar.edu/atmosnews/perspective/14009/snowfall-measurement-flaky-history Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 global climate change https://www2.ucar.edu/atmosnews/perspective/14009/snowfall-measurement-flaky-history The average annual total NESIS score from 2009-10 through this year is over 3x higher than the average of all other years going back to 1956. 15-20% doesn't account for that magnitude of difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Lurker Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Dumping snow, for the moment anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Mostly rain in the valley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The average annual total NESIS score from 2009-10 through this year is over 3x higher than the average of all other years going back to 1956. 15-20% doesn't account for that magnitude of difference. Yet only one storm (last week) is even in the top 15. It's been an pretty crazy period, but hard to attribute it to any single variable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Lurker Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Mostly rain in the valleySorry to hear that. Enormous parachutes, but it's winding down. Maybe another round a little later on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yet only one storm (last week) is even in the top 15. It's been an pretty crazy period, but hard to attribute it to any single variable. I wasn't trying to attribute it solely to global warming. The fact that only one storm was in the top 15, but the overall sum of the storms is 3.5x higher than average, says that it's not so much that storms have gotten bigger, it's that mid to large sized storms have become more frequent. That, or they really didn't track them very well in past decades. You probably know the answer to this, were there a lot of "NESIS 1" type storms that are just not included in NESIS from the 50s through the 2000s? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Sorry to hear that. Enormous parachutes, but it's winding down. Maybe another round a little later on?Well I'll be in Death Valley until 6ish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The average annual total NESIS score from 2009-10 through this year is over 3x higher than the average of all other years going back to 1956. 15-20% doesn't account for that magnitude of difference.more data,more people, understanding the formula helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 I wasn't trying to attribute it solely to global warming. The fact that only one storm was in the top 15, but the overall sum of the storms is 3.5x higher than average, says that it's not so much that storms have gotten bigger, it's that mid to large sized storms have become more frequent. That, or they really didn't track them very well in past decades. You probably know the answer to this, were there a lot of "NESIS 1" type storms that are just not included in NESIS from the 50s through the 2000s? I have to believe there are...there's a lot of storms that must have scored well (like March 1994, March 2001, T-day 1971, December 1975, etc) but didn't get on the list because they didn't hit the big I-95 cities hard...but in more recent years they have included storms like February 1-2, 2011 which didn't hit I-95 but score high because they crushed Chicago and other Midwest cities while giving very little snowfall to the northeast I-95 cities outside of a 10-spot in BOS. It's an interesting study...there's def been more I-95 hits in the past 5 years, but it is hard to say if that is flukish or something to keep expecting for the next 5 years or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 It's a slippery slope when using snowfall trends to justify anything. Getting accurate measurements is bad enough, and then throw on top of that...measuring changes and inconsistencies. Good luck. is that a bad pun ...no, no one in this conversation (this page) was justifying anything.. it was merely conjecture centered around there being more frequent events where snow totals were n of 20" in recent decades comparatively. nothing more... but now that you mentioned it; actually, sorry to say but the climate modeling has been saying ...for decades, that heavier precipitation events would become more frequent as the air holds more and more water vapor and so forth. i think increasing heavy snow frequency might apply - just a guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 more data,more people, understanding the formula helps My understanding is that it is based off the 2000 census. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 more data,more people, understanding the formula helps The population is set to to 2000 census, so population growth won't affect the scale. Anyways, this is getting pretty OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 is that a bad pun ...no, no one in this conversation (this page) was justifying anything.. it was merely conjecture centered around there being more frequent events where snow totals were n of 20" in recent decades comparatively. nothing more... but now that you mentioned it; actually, sorry to say but the climate modeling has been saying ...for decades, that heavier precipitation events would become more frequent as the air holds more and more water vapor and so forth. i think increasing heavy snow frequency might apply - just a guess... People can use that as a metric. My point is that using snowfall is not a very good metric to gauge global warming here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 People can use that as a metric. My point is that using snowfall is not a very good metric to gauge global warming here. i don't know how you can logically disconnect snow from that discussion - but 'not a very good one' not sure why not. snow is a type of a precipitation event. buuuuut, i tell you what, this modeling thread is now officially derailed and i feel partially responsible. perhaps the discussion could be rejoined in some climate thread somewhere... word! sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 is that a bad pun ...no, no one in this conversation (this page) was justifying anything.. it was merely conjecture centered around there being more frequent events where snow totals were n of 20" in recent decades comparatively. nothing more... but now that you mentioned it; actually, sorry to say but the climate modeling has been saying ...for decades, that heavier precipitation events would become more frequent as the air holds more and more water vapor and so forth. i think increasing heavy snow frequency might apply - just a guess... do you know if for the last decade during the increase in these heavy snow winters if precip totals are AN? LOTS of high ratio storms can skew,see 2015. I agree we have seen an increase here in SNE this decade but NNE has seen a decrease. It's localized on a scale of a globe. Higher precip events have occurred but aren't unusual in our history. But there is a climate change forum here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The population is set to to 2000 census, so population growth won't affect the scale. Anyways, this is getting pretty OT. oh wow so 60's storms are artificially inflated, wow didn't know that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Tippy. My point is that you have fairly high accuracy techniques at gauging trends like rainfall and temperature data. We can record those with fairly high accuracy all things considered. When you have snowfall and the varying ways of measuring, along with inaccuracies and inconsistencies...I think people should be careful here. Sure you can perhaps get an idea of subtle trends....but snowfall data IMO does not even fall in the same category as getting good data from rainfall or temperatures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Well I'll be in Death Valley until 6ish Surprising since it was all snow here in WeHa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.