Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 2016 Discussion


IWXwx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Still looks like a potential accumulating lake effect snow event around southern Lake Michigan Sunday into Monday.  There's been a trend toward slightly better moisture depth/inversion heights.  Delta T looks very good, in the upper teens to perhaps around 20-22C at peak.  Do have some concern about possible transient nature of the band so I'm reluctant to go too big on totals.  Still a few days out but currently thinking widespread 1-3" amounts around the lake from southwest Michigan into northwest Indiana and northeast Illinois, with probably some higher amounts (3-6?) where the band can linger longest.  Do think the band will still be fairly organized as it swings westward into northwest Indiana/northeast Illinois on Monday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still looks like a potential accumulating lake effect snow event around southern Lake Michigan Sunday into Monday. There's been a trend toward slightly better moisture depth/inversion heights. Delta T looks very good, in the upper teens to perhaps around 20-22C at peak. Do have some concern about possible transient nature of the band so I'm reluctant to go too big on totals. Still a few days out but currently thinking widespread 1-3" amounts around the lake from southwest Michigan into northwest Indiana and northeast Illinois, with probably some higher amounts (3-6?) where the band can linger longest. Do think the band will still be fairly organized as it swings westward into northwest Indiana/northeast Illinois on Monday.

I've been watching this closely as well. Band does look very transient, and also looks pretty fast moving. Encouraging to see it on the GFS, GGEM, and Euro. Oddly enough, the NAM seems least bullish with this. I'd be more inclined to think lower totals across NW Indiana and NE Illinois, probably up to an inch at most. Still very nice and refreshing. Thinking they can pull off some higher totals in NE Indiana and SW Michigan, on the order of 1-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been watching this closely as well. Band does look very transient, and also looks pretty fast moving. Encouraging to see it on the GFS, GGEM, and Euro. Oddly enough, the NAM seems least bullish with this. I'd be more inclined to think lower totals across NW Indiana and NE Illinois, probably up to an inch at most. Still very nice and refreshing. Thinking they can pull off some higher totals in NE Indiana and SW Michigan, on the order of 1-3.

 

I think the organization/snowfall intensity will make up for the transient nature to some degree...at least enough to drop fairly widespread 1-3" amounts near the lake.  Also will have to watch for possible mesolow development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice video and pictures Buffalo Weather. Glad you got the LES machine turned on over your area again. Looks like you are happy!

 

Over here now, the NAM is showing a decent setup for LES early Monday morning/overnight Sunday.

Looks to start over in Michigan and swing westward. An actually plume starts to take shape on simulated radar.

 

Dry layer on the NAM looks higher than earlier GFS runs.

Winds stacked up and out of the NE.

 

NAM_218_2016010112_F75_42.5000N_88.0000W

 

CMC has a good plume signature as well. Better into extreme NW IN.

 

gem_mslp_pcpn_ncus_12.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice video and pictures Buffalo Weather. Glad you got the LES machine turned on over your area again. 

 

Over here now, the NAM is showing a decent setup for LES early Monday morning/overnight Sunday.

Looks to start over in Michigan and swing westward. An actually plume starts to take shape on simulated radar.

 

Dry layer on the NAM looks higher than earlier GFS runs.

Winds stacked up and out of the NE.

 

NAM_218_2016010112_F75_42.5000N_88.0000W

 

CMC has a good plume signature as well. Better into extreme NW IN.

 

gem_mslp_pcpn_ncus_12.png

 

 

 

The NAM has trended better with inversion heights since yesterday for sure.  GFS is actually a bit more favorable than the NAM.

 

If we can back the incoming mid level trough a bit farther west, then moisture depth/inversion heights would be even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boyne area?

Was at Boyne Mountain (Boyne Falls). Left just before noon...a good 6-7" had fallen and it was ripping to about just south of Gaylord. I'm willing to bet a couple more fell after I left.

Little tidbit about snow squalls in Lower Michigan. All the way south to about just north of Standish couple inches had fell but once u got to Standish through Bay City/Saginaw all the way to about Mt Morris. Little to no snow had fallen. Then once you got south of 475 snow picked up again. Then it really showed a decent snowfall from Holly to about the Sashabaw Exit. Got home and about 2.5" had fallen at my house. This area really is a "mini snowbelt"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM has trended better with inversion heights since yesterday for sure.  GFS is actually a bit more favorable than the NAM.

 

If we can back the incoming mid level trough a bit farther west, then moisture depth/inversion heights would be even better.

 

18z coming in even better. Plume is near the western shoreline most of the day Monday. Looks like a good dose of snow in Western MI also. Just need to get the mid level trough to line up better, like you said.

Alek would be stacking flakes like a boss again.

 

nam_2016010118_069_41.99--87.74.png

 

4km NAM in range for Michigan now.

 

nam4km_ref_ncus_19.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z coming in even better. Plume is near the western shoreline most of the day Monday. Looks like a good dose of snow in Western MI also. Just need to get the mid level trough to line up better, like you said.

Alek would be stacking flakes like a boss again.

 

nam_2016010118_069_41.99--87.74.png

 

4km NAM in range for Michigan now.

 

nam4km_ref_ncus_19.png

 

18z NAM definitely looks much better for NW Indiana and NE Illinois...even gets you in on the flakes a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM definitely looks much better for NW Indiana and NE Illinois...even gets you in on the flakes a bit.

 

You do well when the winds are NNE below 25°. Here is takes a touch more of a easterly component. I like when I see the winds more easterly blowing offshore of Michigan and there's a convergence of almost straight N winds on the shoreline here.

Hopefully the trend stays the same and we have something to track this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet Aurora pics.^

 

First sunset of the new year was a colorful one.

 

attachicon.gif20160101_163757.jpg

 

Sweet sounding Hoosier. Looking like Delta T values around 20°C.

 

 

Yeah...could peak a bit higher than 20C depending on how cold it gets at 850 mb.  I used a lake temp of 44F...I think that is fairly representative as the areas close to shore are generally in the upper 30s and some pockets farther out in the middle of the lake may be a bit warmer than 44F.

 

Here's another image.  This is from GYY, showing omega and the snow growth zone.  The omega bullseye is at/just below the bottom of the DGZ but still have nice lift in the dgz.  Barring significant changes, I think this type of setup may be capable of 1-2" per hour type rates at its peak so it could pile up pretty fast if it manages to stay over any one spot.

 

 

post-14-0-63963900-1451698128_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do well when the winds are NNE below 25°. Here is takes a touch more of a easterly component. I like when I see the winds more easterly blowing offshore of Michigan and there's a convergence of almost straight N winds on the shoreline here.

Hopefully the trend stays the same and we have something to track this weekend.

I sure hope we can get some lake effect snows from this. All of our "events" off the lake this year have been DOA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...could peak a bit higher than 20C depending on how cold it gets at 850 mb.  I used a lake temp of 44F...I think that is fairly representative as the areas close to shore are generally in the upper 30s and some pockets farther out in the middle of the lake may be a bit warmer than 44F.

 

Here's another image.  This is from GYY, showing omega and the snow growth zone.  The omega bullseye is at/just below the bottom of the DGZ but still have nice lift in the dgz.  Barring significant changes, I think this type of setup may be capable of 1-2" per hour type rates at its peak so it could pile up pretty fast if it manages to stay over any one spot.

 

 

attachicon.gifUntitled.png

 

Yeah I see that pocket there.

 

True enough. We have had several events that were supposed to give us Lake enhanced snows that never came to fruition. Geos' side of the lake has been doing better this year.

 

That's crazy that I've had more snow than you. Goes to show how much of your seasonal snowfall tally is from LES.

 

28/17 today, definitely felt like winter.

 

Edit:

LOT mentioning the LES chances. Not ready to jump and say any total yet though.

 

 

SUNDAY THROUGH FRIDAY...

MAIN FORECAST CONCERNS/CHALLENGES ARE WITH LAKE EFFECT SNOW

SHOWER POTENTIAL SUNDAY INTO MONDAY.

MUCH OF THE FORECAST PERIOD WILL REMAIN ON THE DRY SIDE...BUT

WITH INCREASING CHANCES FOR SNOW SHOWERS EXPECTED ACROSS NORTHEAST

ILLINOIS AND NORTHWEST INDIANA FIRST AT THE START OF THE PERIOD.

LARGE SCALE PATTERN WILL CONSIST OF A LARGE UPPER LEVEL TROUGH

DIGGING ACROSS THE EASTERN CONUS SUNDAY AND SUNDAY NIGHT. AS THIS

OCCURS...COLDER AIRMASS WILL SPILL SOUTH ACROSS THE REGION. WITH

THIS COLD ADVECTION EXPECTED EARLY NEXT WEEK...DID LOWER TEMPS

SUNDAY THROUGH MONDAY NIGHT. THE BIGGER IMPACT THIS COLD WILL HAVE

WILL BE FOR AN INCREASE IN LAKE EFFECT SNOW ACROSS THE LAKE.

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW WILL INITIALLY BE SITUATED SUCH THAT ANY

DEVELOPMENT WILL STAY EAST OF THE CWA. HOWEVER...SOME OF THE

WEAKER DEVELOPMENT MAY SPILL INTO PORTER COUNTY ON SUNDAY AND SO

HAVE SPREAD SLIGHT CHANCE POPS DURING THAT TIME. IT DOES APPEAR

THAT LATER IN THE DAY AND ESPECIALLY SUNDAY NIGHT INTO MONDAY

MORNING THAT CONDITIONS OVER THE LAKE WILL BE MORE FAVORABLE FOR

DEVELOPMENT. INCREASING DELTA TS AND INVERSION HEIGHTS WILL BE THE

TREND AND WHILE SYNOPTIC LIFT RAMPS UP AHEAD OF A SOUTHWARD MOVING

STOUT MID LEVEL WAVE. BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW WILL BE VEERING SUNDAY

NIGHT INTO MONDAY AS WELL AND SO BROUGHT POPS INITIALLY ACROSS

NORTHWEST INDIANA SUNDAY NIGHT...BUT THEN ALSO INTO AREAS IN FAR

NORTHEAST ILLINOIS ON MONDAY. DID WANT TO INCREASE POPS/WORDING

AND QPF/SNOW WITH THIS FORECAST ISSUANCE AND HAVE DONE SO...BUT

COULD SEE POPS AND QPF/SNOW INCREASED FURTHER OVER THE NEXT COUPLE

OF ISSUANCES AS CONFIDENCE ON DURATION AND COVERAGE INCREASE.

RODRIGUEZ

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z NAM looks like it only has a brief window of NNE winds and favorable conditions for lake effect Monday morning, which is why it only shows minimal amounts along the Wisconsin/NE IL shoreline. With the caveat that the 12km NAM will almost always under-do lake effect related QPF, I'd definitely rather be in NW IN if I was downwind of Lake Michigan for the upcoming event than on the western side of the lake. The winds appear to go NNE on the backside of the upper level trough when large scale subsidence and drier air move overhead...not the best setup...maybe someone gets lucky near Chicago and gets under the band for a few hours before it diminishes by Monday afternoon and sees 3"...higher amounts probably would be in Indiana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z NAM looks like it only has a brief window of NNE winds and favorable conditions for lake effect Monday morning, which is why it only shows minimal amounts along the Wisconsin/NE IL shoreline. With the caveat that the 12km NAM will almost always under-do lake effect related QPF, I'd definitely rather be in NW IN if I was downwind of Lake Michigan for the upcoming event than on the western side of the lake. The winds appear to go NNE on the backside of the upper level trough when large scale subsidence and drier air move overhead...not the best setup...maybe someone gets lucky near Chicago and gets under the band for a few hours before it diminishes by Monday afternoon and sees 3"...higher amounts probably would be in Indiana.

 

 

The tradeoff with what you mentioned is that it looks like a window where lake-850 mb delta T should be increasing a bit even after inversion heights start coming down, so it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tradeoff with what you mentioned is that it looks like a window where lake-850 mb delta T should be increasing a bit even after inversion heights start coming down, so it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.

I1frrl.png

Just looking at a couple of soundings off of the 0z NAM for Monday when the band would be trying to push into SE WI/NE IL, moisture depth isn't great, but you have a saturated layer with absolutely unstable lapse rates up to about 5k feet and through a good chunk of the DGZ. I think the marginal inversion heights/moisture depth would keep things from getting out of hand, but the 18z soundings from under the band look similar, so I could see a band that produces nice, very high ratio dendrites that add up relatively fast. I still like my 3" number max for the west side of the lake given the short duration and marginal moisture depth/inversion heights, but I'm never against bumping up if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...