TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:45 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: It's not huge anywhere outside of the N ORH hills, monadnocks and the Berkshires. Idk looks like everyone flipped over to a nice period of snow. Obviously west is better though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:50 AM, Ginx snewx said: Ct River west WCT peeps might take issue with that verbatim 18-20 Unless they are in the Berkshires, they are taking issue with the truth: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Nice, event. General 8-12" outside of the aforementioned high terrain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:52 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Unless they are in the Berkshires, they are taking issue with the truth:are you color blind?see that 20 in the Mohads, look at WCT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:41 AM, Typhoon Tip said: True, but usually, you're original dead-panned anti-thetic timing is a troll attempt. If you had checked back a bit earlier, you would have seen my favorable comments re: the first system. Why is someone labeled a troll for saying something contrary to one particular model suddenly showing a major coastal? If weathafella had made the same comment, would you have labeled him a troll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:55 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Nice, event. General 8-12" outside of the aforementioned high terrain. Those maps suck IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:57 AM, Ginx snewx said: are you color blind? The hills have the 18-20" amounts. My eyes are much younger yours I'm 20/20 Vision. N Adams 13", Springfield, MA 12". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:00 AM, CT Rain said: Those maps suck IMO. It is what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Of course if this were modeled correctly that QPF with that sick inflow would be much higher. But we fantasy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:00 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: The hills have the 18-20" amounts. My eyes are much younger yours I'm 20/20 Vision. N Adams 13", Springfield, MA 12". WCT? Ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:00 AM, Ginx snewx said: Of course if this were modeled correctly that QPF with that sick inflow would be much higher. But we fantasy CT Valley does not always do so hot with inflow....see Dec 1992. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:01 AM, Ginx snewx said: WCT? Ok. Yes....extension of Berkshires. "HIGH TERRAIN" Semantics. You love these crusade arguments in favor of extra snow/cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 5:45 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: It's not huge anywhere outside of the N ORH hills, monadnocks and the Berkshires. On 1/3/2016 at 5:57 AM, Ginx snewx said: are you color blind?see that 20 in the Mohads, look at WCT Blind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:00 AM, CT Rain said: Those maps suck IMO.they sure do, now this includes round 1 but those areas west of the CT river dont even smell taint. Verbatim its an epic week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:00 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: It is what it is. Better off taking a cursory glance of the important levels and if <0c just go 10:1 off qpf. I can honestly say I never even bother with those automated snow plots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Usually the CT RV needs to get deformed to get huge amounts, otherwise they get downsloped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:06 AM, CT Rain said: Better off taking a cursory glance of the important levels and if <0c just go 10:1 off qpf. I can honestly say I never even bother with those automated snow plots. If I thought this may actually happen, then I would. I agree they are crude at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:07 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Usually the CT RV needs to get deformed to get huge amounts, otherwise they get downsloped. True up by Springfield and Northampton but rarely a big issue down this way with the exception of a storm like 12/92. Regardless the gfs is a pretty epic hit back this way. Pattern is primed for it... Let's hope it pans out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:05 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Blind?typo police, my bad, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:09 AM, Ginx snewx said: typo police, my bad, lol. This modeled solution reminds me of Dec 1992 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 I would pay to see that outcome, Tobin jumpers galore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:10 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: This modeled solution reminds me of Dec 1992 Really? I see no similarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Gefs have both storms. Nice look for this far out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:10 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: This modeled solution reminds me of Dec 1992nope midlevels too far east, 92 was under SNE with strict east flow, this is more ENE flow, keeping west areas in colder deform bands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:11 AM, CT Rain said: Really? I see no similarity Just the track and very high QPF.....I don't compare the upper air plots or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:13 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Just the track and very high QPF.....I don't compare the upper air plots or anything. 92 was a giant cut off that rotted off ACY with screaming easterly flow. This is a pretty classic juiced up/progressive storm coming up the coast along baroclinic zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:13 AM, Ginx snewx said: nope midlevels too far east, 92 was under SNE with strict east flow, this is more ENE flow, keeping west areas in colder deform bands Just looking that that QPF chart that your tossed up there....visceral reaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Give it a few more runs before getting the panties all twisted. As is as in it is what it is and would be taken in a heartbeat. The accumulation maps honestly are a joke simply eye candy. Climo would dictate the usual locals getting screwed or jacked. Come back in a week and "if" the event is modelled as tonights run then the debate can begin. What a great run...I'm taking a trip back if it has staying power. Everytime (as I mentioned) I leave winter goes balls-to-the-wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:15 AM, Roosta said: Give it a few more runs before getting the panties all twisted. As is as in it is what it is and would be taken in a heartbeat. The accumulation maps honestly are a joke simply eye candy. Climo would dictate the usual locals getting screwed or jacked. Come back in a week and "if" the event is modelled as tonights run then the debate can begin. What a great run...I'm taking a trip back if it has staying power. Everytime (as I mentioned) I leave winter goes balls-to-the-wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 On 1/3/2016 at 6:14 AM, CT Rain said: 92 was a giant cut off that rotted off ACY with screaming easterly flow. This is a pretty classic juiced up/progressive storm coming up the coast along baroclinic zone.yep, Ryan GEFs dead ringer for 1-12-11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.