Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January Med/Long Range Discussion


North Balti Zen

Recommended Posts

There is one caveat that is starting to show itself in the LR. The SE Ridge. Started to show up on today's EPS. Tonight's 00z EURO for example, Day 9-10, the setup would normally be an amazing one,but the SE ridge ends up being so strong that any storm would probably cut. We'll see, long way out. 

The dreaded SE ridge. Always messes a good thing up. :axe: :axe: :axe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here is  what I am afraid of on what could go wrong in this upcoming pattern. Looking at all the other features you'd have to be positive; Some Greenland ridging, energy coming out of the southwest, and a semi-decent PV that is in a good spot (though we'd def want it farther SE)...However, the negative is that semi-beastly SE Ridge roaring its ugly head. With that there the cold air just can't get far enough south, and it looks like the low on this run would end up cutting. WAY otu there and it will change in 12 hours, but just something to keep an eye out for 

 

post-8091-0-10548100-1451463131_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen posted the morning 6z GEFS week two precip anomalies, so basically day 8 through day 14 and pretty dry up here, wet down South.

 

You can see the prep going out to sea East of North Carolina. Not sure of any significant biases with the GEFS at this range, as I believe it does not overall suppress storms out to sea like the typical GFS.   

 

Looking at today's forecasted AO and NAO, trends seem to indicate AO stays negative longer and NAO may go negative during week two.

 

Here is the Canadian 10 day mean , pretty warm deviation in northwest Canada.  

 

https://weather.gc.ca/data/ensemble/images/tenday.gif

  

 

https://twitter.com/RaleighWx/status/682176994998521856

 

CXeUW4NUEAA1uly.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is  what I am afraid of on what could go wrong in this upcoming pattern. Looking at all the other features you'd have to be positive; Some Greenland ridging, energy coming out of the southwest, and a semi-decent PV that is in a good spot (though we'd def want it farther SE)...However, the negative is that semi-beastly SE Ridge roaring its ugly head. With that there the cold air just can't get far enough south, and it looks like the low on this run would end up cutting. WAY otu there and it will change in 12 hours, but just something to keep an eye out for 

 

attachicon.gifouch.png

 

Trough in the SW favors higher heights on the east coast in general. That feature is going to tend to fight the trough in eastern Canada and inhibit its ability to build/ deliver colder air southward. Most likely temps will be average to slightly above average for the next 10 days or so in the MA and NE, if that pattern holds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That PNA ridge isn't a good thing this go I don't think. I'm more and more convinced of that watching things play out. It was suggested in the strong Nino analogs but still kind of counterintuitive given recent years at least. It seems to help roll higher heights southeast relatively continuously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Ian but I'm not sure it's the just pna ridge working against us as much as not having enough blocking established. Fairly sharp trough on the means in the SW/SoCal area centered around d10 or so. Without a strong block above us the broad trough over the conus isn't getting established. Ridge response to the SW trough is raising heights in the east because the -AO isn't strong enough to suppress heights. The pna ridge adds to the problem because it's rolling forward a bit raising heights eastward in Canada. 

 

Everything still looks good but it seems overnight guidance is pushing the best stuff later in time now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That PNA ridge isn't a good thing this go I don't think. I'm more and more convinced of that watching things play out. It was suggested in the strong Nino analogs but still kind of counterintuitive given recent years at least. It seems to help roll higher heights southeast relatively continuously.

 

I agree. I believe that the best chances for a East Coast snow storm threat is near the last third of the month of January into early February. We might have to wait for the developing - NAO to really contribute to the pattern. ( If you believe in fairy tales ) Also, what might happen is similar to the video that JB played this morning on WxBell.

 

http://www.weatherbell.com/

 

JB looked at the weather of mid January 1966 to mid February 1966. There were a series of four storms that affected the  Mid Atlantic area, including the Blizzard of 1966 that went up the East Coast. He mentioned that due to overall similarities to the previous December in 1965 and this current December. Although looking at his 1966 map of Jan Canada looks much colder. But who knows,  by later this January Canada may indeed gotten colder, but not sure that really matters versus where blocking sets up.

 

Of course on the other end of possibilities there are misses to the South, with Eastern NC and SC scoring big, as I mentioned yesterday. 

 

https://twitter.com/webberweather

 

 

CXca69NWMAABT0I.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Ian but I'm not sure it's the just pna ridge working against us as much as not having enough blocking established. Fairly sharp trough on the means in the SW/SoCal area centered around d10 or so. Without a strong block above us the broad trough over the conus isn't getting established. Ridge response to the SW trough is raising heights in the east because the -AO isn't strong enough to suppress heights. The pna ridge adds to the problem because it's rolling forward a bit raising heights eastward in Canada.

Everything still looks good but it seems overnight guidance is pushing the best stuff later in time now.

False start, modeling 15 day penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree - if you are in southern TX or northern Mexico and like snow

post-5736-0-60808900-1451497106_thumb.pn

 

I'm thinking we in Mid Atlantic see our 1st real threat towards end of Jan or early Feb.. (delayed but not denied, as JB would say)

 

 

Nah, this is awesome and totally what we want to see in the first half of Jan (from the just completed 12z run)

 

attachicon.gifUSA_ASNOWIPER_sfc_384.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one caveat that is starting to show itself in the LR. The SE Ridge. Started to show up on today's EPS. Tonight's 00z EURO for example, Day 9-10, the setup would normally be an amazing one,but the SE ridge ends up being so strong that any storm would probably cut. We'll see, long way out. 

 

One benefit to the SE ridge it would help prevent suppression that others have talked about. It has saved us before in blocky patterns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gfs_z500a_namer_29.png

Greenland block And -EPO and we still have above normal heights. Someone call the geek squad I think our teleconnectors are broken.

it doesn't instantly fix everything. Have to give the epo AO and nao a little time to work their magic. We're starting from such an awful base state. I'm just as aware of the potential for this next pattern to fail but we have to wait and let it play out. We can really only see into the start of it and then only on the long almost fiction range. If a week from now we still don't see any real potential on operational models then I'll start to get more concerned. It's very early yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 SORRY  but this is just  I domnt see what is  woof worthy Jan7   on 0z   186 h  euro 
  
its  holds some promise but  we also  have to get the cold air into place

 

00z EURO @ 186 hours = woof.....PV in great spot, energy crashing into the Southwest....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS always hates major pattern changes. I'm not shocked at all that it's op runs and ensembles as a whole have had numerous runs where they haven't looked great

 

I thought the GFS ensemble mean looked more or less pretty consistent for awhile now in the medium-longer range with the overall idea of the pattern.  My guess is the Euro ensembles have been similar (though I haven't seen those directly), going by the discussion I've seen in here.  Not saying it's going to be right, but the ensemble mean is primarily what I've looked at for that time period.  As for the deterministic, yes, that can be all over the place of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...