Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,875
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Anbelon
    Newest Member
    Anbelon
    Joined

2015-16 Winter Pattern Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/1/2016 at 4:50 PM, burgertime said:

lol gotta love the 12z in fantasy land. Descent CAD setup and then it spins a big ULL that hammers NC with snow. .0000001% chance of that happening. 

 

Wow, I am more bullish than you, I would say 20% chance, you don't see that very often, LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:50 PM, burgertime said:

lol gotta love the 12z in fantasy land. Descent CAD setup and then it spins a big ULL that hammers NC with snow. .0000001% chance of that happening. 

CAD setup at 240hrs from absolutely nothing on the 06z...classic GFS OP 240hrs+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:45 PM, Jon said:

We have essentially 10 days of runs  left, I'm not sure how important the 12z runs are today...they will likely not show much different than the 00z. We just need to wait until the models still have it in under 5 days. The HP does need to trend a lot better than currently being modeled for anyone in the SE to have a chance. I like the inland track at this time (through Central NC), of course that can change as we move forward but nothing really indicates, to me, a low strength Miller A staying suppressed off our coast (more likely an inland to coastal bomb for the NE as the hp moves in overtop). Like you said we could get stronger highs to our north, we NEED that in order to cash in here and it's non-existent at this point.

This is why I think the 12z runs are important, mainly the Euro ensembles. If we are going to see more of a Miller A track then we want models to start picking up on a stronger HP and blocking to the north. Since we are 216-240 hours out we have time, however I've noticed once inside 144-180 hours models begin locking down on a solution so we need things to start showing up soon if we are going to get a more suppressed track. There is so much energy flying around everywhere, short waves and low pressure systems, that the evolution and strength of them will impact future storms also. There will be 2-3 storms to track in the 10-15th range it looks like and with a good pattern setting up we should score on one of them, hey all 3 would be great but that's not realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:53 PM, burgertime said:

lol big CAD storm OK..a ULL directly behind it that transfers to the coast and deepens??? Come on!! 

 

Makes sense...no?   :bag:   I am trying to feed the hungry...I get beat on for being honest so I have to throw in some hope or Mack gets on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:51 PM, Jon said:

CAD setup at 240hrs from absolutely nothing on the 06z...classic GFS OP 240hrs+

Maybe GFS OP runs belong in the banter thread like someone suggested yesterday lol. Basically if you don't like what the GFS shows, wait for the next run and you'll get an entirely different solution :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:52 PM, snowlover91 said:

This is why I think the 12z runs are important, mainly the Euro ensembles. If we are going to see more of a Miller A track then we want models to start picking up on a stronger HP and blocking to the north. Since we are 216-240 hours out we have time, however I've noticed once inside 144-180 hours models begin locking down on a solution so we need things to start showing up soon if we are going to get a more suppressed track. There is so much energy flying around everywhere, short waves and low pressure systems, that the evolution and strength of them will impact future storms also. There will be 2-3 storms to track in the 10-15th range it looks like and with a good pattern setting up we should score on one of them, hey all 3 would be great but that's not realistic.

I agree 100% with you, my point in saying the 12z won't say much is that it's hard to nail down a solution in this time frame so you'll likely see one thing and the next run will give you another (same thing goes for ensembles)...it's just too erratic to tell you much. If you start looking at specifics now it will be a long 10 days haha, but I understand the excitement! 12z is about as weenie as it gets for N VA, 25"+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:53 PM, burgertime said:

lol big CAD storm OK..a ULL directly behind it that transfers to the coast and deepens??? Come on!! 

That track and low transfer seems 110% realistic! LOCK IT IN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:57 PM, Jon said:

I agree 100% with you, my point in saying the 12z won't say much is that it's hard to nail down a solution in this time frame so you'll likely see one thing and the next run will give you another (same thing goes for ensembles)...it's just too erratic to tell you much. If you start looking at specifics now it will be a long 10 days haha, but I understand the excitement! 12z is about as weenie as it gets for N VA, 25"+

Haha next run it'll show a Midwest cutter the way the GFS is. Now when the Euro starts showing some snow and under 200 hours then maybe we can start getting excited, with many sleepless nights and PBP of the Euro taking our hopes and dreams away lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 4:29 PM, jburns said:

The fly in that ointment is the fact that there is a lot of warm water off the coast.  While that would help a storm intensify it also would throw quite a bit of warmth ashore with the moisture forcing the changeover line further west than is normal.

That is a very good point! I think there will be a lot of messy storm...... #mixbag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 3:26 AM, snowlover91 said:

For those curious the high res Euro (parallel) meteogram for Raleigh has significantly improved in recent days. I'll let the chart speak for itself but good agreement for something between January 10-15th with that big storm from the SW.

attachicon.gifimage.png

 

Do you mind posting the meteogram for Atlanta?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 5:12 PM, NCrain said:

Cohen FTW...his latest model/forecast for J-M temps. We snow if true...

The numbers on his map don't look like they match up with the legend. The best I can tell on his map, the darkest area looks to be -1.0 C. But that particular color looks more associated with the -2.0 on the legend. I can run a level 2 diagnostic on my multiphasic spectral micrometer, but that will take a while. Can someone else validate for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 5:42 PM, Cold Rain said:

The numbers on his map don't look like they match up with the legend. The best I can tell on his map, the darkest area looks to be -1.0 C. But that particular color looks more associated with the -2.0 on the legend. I can run a level 2 diagnostic on my multiphasic spectral micrometer, but that will take a while. Can someone else validate for me?

 

Looks like it matches to me. Each shade is in increments of 0.2, so yes, when you count the layers/shades, the darkest area is "only" -1.0C You are correct, CR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/1/2016 at 5:40 PM, snowlover91 said:

Here you go! First one is the high res Euro ensembles and second is the extended range Euro ensembles.

attachicon.gifimage.png

attachicon.gifimage.png

Thank you! Doesn't look as crazy as I thought it was gonna look, but still looks nice.. It also seems there will be multiple storm threats throughout the 45-day period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...