Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

WxChallenge 2015-16


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Very interested to see how the remainder of the day plays out. I'd imagine low clouds are the culprit right now, which hasn't let FWA rise at all. Currently at 35 at 16z. I'd be very impressed if they manage to hit anything higher than 48F at this point. Latest HRRR run peaks at 45F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interested to see how the remainder of the day plays out. I'd imagine low clouds are the culprit right now, which hasn't let FWA rise at all. Currently at 35 at 16z. I'd be very impressed if they manage to hit anything higher than 48F at this point. Latest HRRR run peaks at 45F

Seems like they should break soon. High pressure just about overhead. Temps probably won't make it to 50 but hey it is spring and the winds are calming. We will know by 5 today whether they make it another 14 degrees or not. Not too unheard of many places into about IL are starting to show low to mid 40s we will see though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, the last two days hurt me. As of right now I'd need to get into the tournament via a wild card birth. I normally don't care much for week 2 of cities that I'm doing badly in, but if I can claw above consensus for FWA I may still salvage a first round bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, the last two days hurt me. As of right now I'd need to get into the tournament via a wild card birth. I normally don't care much for week 2 of cities that I'm doing badly in, but if I can claw above consensus for FWA I may still salvage a first round bye.

 

Yeah, I'm basically in the same situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52/28/10

Overall, a similar setup to the 25th, when high pressure was overhead and poor low-level mixing resulted in highs being close to the model consensus (ECMWF/SREF were too warm). As mentioned above, based on dew-point trends, didn't go too low for the minimum temperature. I did find it interesting that the 2.5km RGEM dipped temperatures down to 24F, but I have no idea how that model has verified recently at FWA... I don't see winds going too high with high pressure in place, but still went slightly above guidance based on verification trends last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54/30/10/0

 

Thought about pushing it to 55 on the high, but I'm right on the edge of a first round tourney bye, so I'd rather wait till the precip days to take more chances. Low was a tough call. Lack of clouds and low winds made me want to put 28-29, but with dew points in the low 30s I went a little higher. Kinda thinking 29 would have been a better call, but I don't see the low tanking too much below 30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53/27/11

 

As Quincy mentioned, looks about the same as Friday in fact 850s look almost identical (-1 to -2C) except instead of lapse rates of 5.8 C/km it looks like they'll mix a lot better with something close to the DALR. Given that, I'd say somewhere between 52 and 54 is likely. Went with the USL for the low as this seems like a night where they should drop pretty far although the high dews are concerning. The wind should be light during the day but it looked like could get some really trong winds just off the deck tomorrow night so I figured they might have a chance to tap into a bit of that although the inversion does look strong on NAM BUFKIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53/30/10/0. Model consensus on the high. Wanted to go a bit cooler on the low but I just didn't see them dropping unless winds die off completely, which I don't think they'll do. 

 

A good day for consensus will probably help me overall for the cumulative scoring, so I'm OK with this. Late week is going to be very stressful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn. I had 30 initially because the dews were running higher than modeled during the afternoon, and bumped down when they dropped to near what the NAM MOS had by 0z. Bad call by me

 

Yep, I had started at 29 myself and bumped down based on the lower guidance (especially the HiRes NAM, which is rarely too low, but was last night).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

65/35/28/0

 

This city never gives an easy day. I was waffling on the high, originally had 65 then changed it to 67 and then back to 65 at the last second. I just felt like clouds would prevent them from climbing quite as high as they did last Wednesday but I could easily see another over-modeled cloud forecast and temperatures busting high as they often have here. Dew points don't look low enough for them to drop below 35 and with some clouds and a bit of a SE breeze I'm hoping for the low to stay on the warmer side as it did last night. Wind looked like it would get quite strong after 00z with 30 kts not too far from the ground so felt comfortable with 28 kts. I didn't see any significant height falls until after 00z but with FWA still on the edge of the 500-700 ridge axis, elected to go dry as any lift looked disorganized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

65/34/27/0.02".

 

A very middle of the road approach for tomorrow. A few hi-res WRF runs had them approaching 68-70F, but I just didn't feel confident enough about it. If clouds are a bit delayed or overmodeled than I could easily see them hitting 70. They won't manage a strong inversion tonight and southeast winds favor a warmer low. Strong WAA towards the end of the day tomorrow, but I don't feel particularly confident that they'll get much precip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

65/34/29/0.03

Was tempted to push the high up, but wasn't confident with cloud timing, and really just trying to hold onto my cumulative position the remainder of the week. Low seems plausible with dew points and if the wind picks up earlier. Dunno really on precipitation. Didn't have tons of time to forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...