Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Fall 2015 Pattern Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 802
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I wonder which model will be right.....Only half joking because, somebody had stated that the GFS actually did better on the precipitation banding during the last event; whereas the euro had the better handle on the larger picture.  

 

It did?  This was the Friday run of the 12z GFS, it has the max QPF down the NC/SC line with CLT getting 20+".  Yes, the Euro bounced around but it was consistently showing it in central SC, now maybe it didn't show CAE to Charleston as the hot spot but it wasn't showing CLT.

post-2311-0-38907000-1444317364_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did? This was the Friday run of the 12z GFS, it has the max QPF down the NC/SC line with CLT getting 20+". Yes, the Euro bounced around but it was consistently showing it in central SC, now maybe it didn't show CAE to Charleston as the hot spot but it wasn't showing CLT.

You should look up Isohume comments in the banter thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z EPS very wet for SC, 0.8"+ across almost all of state with 1.2" plus down by the coast (CHS to ILM).  1" to CAE.

 

I believe the Euro was underdone on the flood event with totals overall.  Not a good sign by any means with the 12z GFS ensemble mean creeping up to 1/2 - 3/4 for us.

 

Our local mets here in Columbia have been mainly downplaying the event.  Most were saying a passing/scattered shower.  Nothing heavy.  Seems the actual recovery efforts know there's a chance at something heavier at least.  Richalnd Sheriff alluded to it a bit ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...