Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Met Autumn BANTER


dmillz25

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That'd be cool, but boring. Uncertainty adds to the excitement.

That would be horrible. I think we live in the prime period for a weather enthusiast. CC and computer models good enough to make it fun to track long range events without completely spoiling things. I think in 30 years models will be so good our hobby will be observational rather then forecast based

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be horrible. I think we live in the prime period for a weather enthusiast. CC and computer models good enough to make it fun to track long range events without completely spoiling things. I think in 30 years models will be so good our hobby will be observational rather then forecast based

 

I'm entirely unconvinced. They'll get better, but not that much in the grand scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm entirely unconvinced. They'll get better, but not that much in the grand scheme of things.

According to Moore's law with processor speeds doubling every two years in 30 years today's room size super computers will be the size of a cell phone. A super computer at that time will be capable of billions of times more calculations then our current ones.

I think they will be deadly accurate at that time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Moore's law with processor speeds doubling every two years in 30 years today's room size super computers will be the size of a cell phone. A super computer at that time will be capable of billions of times more calculations then our current ones.

I think they will be deadly accurate at that time

I think the bigger issue is atmospheric sampling. All the supercomputing power in the world won't help you unless you have a clearer picture of starting conditions. Forecasts will obviously continue to improve, as they have for years, but I don't really expect any tipping point in the next few decades where models suddenly become BTTF-esque.

Still, I welcome increasingly precise forecasts with open arms. For all the benefits to economy, agriculture, infrastructure, disaster management, etc., we can afford to forfeit some of the 'thrill' in forecasting an uncertain snowstorm... especially since, for 98% of us, forecasting is just tooling around online while we wait for the next set of pretty maps to render.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media loves to hype here as much as anyone, and people are still on a hair trigger after May's deluge. I saw one "computer model" graphic on a local news channel with 22" of rain shown for Waco. :lmao:

my wife is in Dallas for work and she says it's hype city-she was worried her flight would be canceled tomorrow eve...I told her to relax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my wife is in Dallas for work and she says it's hype city

We can handle whatever falls here unless it's 1-2" per hour repeatedly over multiple hours. The ground is literally bone dry. The grass has gone beyond yellow dry and is literally looking burned. Trees are even drooping over and drying out. Much of the state has gone from soaked to extreme drought in a few months.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hype machine's ramping up just about as fast as Patricia about the rain on the Austin local stations. 

 

http://kxan.com/2014/02/25/daily-forecast-2/

 

:lol: about how it shows 10-14" of rain in an area based on the "NWS projection", when the flood watch we have areawide says 4-8" with spots of 10-12" (as it is, more than enough to grab attention). Plus they show the model output with 17-18" of rain in places (with a caption above that showing "Forecast"). 

 

Reminds me of how the media hypes up snow events in NYC. I still remember cracking up at Janice Huff when she showed the 27" of snow on the screen as a "model prediction" before the 2/8/13 storm in Central Park which ended up at about 11". 

 

The bad part of this is that if people in their 10-14" area end up with 3" and no impact (since areas in an event like this will have huge 12" rain totals and a few miles away much less), the average viewer will disregard KXAN the next time a real threat happens in their backyard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the note at the bottom

"Correction: A previous version of this article misinterpreted aspects of the study. The story has been corrected and substantially revised"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And 880mb. Wow.

Insane. The only positive I guess is that the terrain in that area will weaken it rapidly.

Whoever is on the coast near landfall..I cant imagine what that will be like. sustained 200 mph, gusts near 250.

I just picture a super sized, long lasting F4 tornado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...