Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

May 7th-10th Severe Outbreaks


andyhb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If the Pueblo/Wigwam cell has a tornado, thankfully not many buildings in the entire tornado warning polygon, away from Pueblo/Colorado Springs population.

Inflow into the storm is too cold. It's 45 where I am. Struggling to produce.

Side note: road network down here sucks.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED  
TORNADO WARNING  
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORT WORTH TX  
428 PM CDT SAT MAY 9 2015  
 
THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN FORT WORTH HAS ISSUED A  
 
* TORNADO WARNING FOR...  
WEST CENTRAL EASTLAND COUNTY IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS...  
 
* UNTIL 515 PM CDT  
 
* AT 427 PM CDT...A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A  
TORNADO WAS LOCATED NEAR CISCO...MOVING NORTHEAST AT 5 MPH.  
 
HAZARD...TORNADO AND HAIL UP TO THREE INCHES IN DIAMETER.  
 
SOURCE...RADAR INDICATED ROTATION.  
 
IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT  
SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED.  
DAMAGE TO ROOFS...WINDOWS AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR. TREE  
DAMAGE IS LIKELY.  
 
* THIS DANGEROUS STORM WILL BE NEAR...  
CISCO AROUND 515 PM CDT.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is north of Granbury on its current heading, which targets areas W and WSW of DFW--areas that are less densely populated than areas due SW of DFW. I consider the first major population center in its path (Weatherford) part of the DFW metro area. And on second thought, the distance between the cell and more back-veer-back profiles to the north isn't very great, which gives me more confidence that the tornado threat is conditional and might be even shorter-lived than I suspected. You can see how cells to the N of the southernmost one are struggling to maintain their isolation. UL winds might back even more over the next few hours as the UL trough approaches. Such would be good news for DFW and other, smaller population centers.

 

Um, they are in an organizing stage? Are you not familiar with how this works?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
TORNADO WARNING
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORT WORTH TX
428 PM CDT SAT MAY 9 2015

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN FORT WORTH HAS ISSUED A

* TORNADO WARNING FOR...
  WEST CENTRAL EASTLAND COUNTY IN NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS...

* UNTIL 515 PM CDT
    
* AT 427 PM CDT...A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A
  TORNADO WAS LOCATED NEAR CISCO...MOVING NORTHEAST AT 5 MPH.

  HAZARD...TORNADO AND HAIL UP TO THREE INCHES IN DIAMETER.

  SOURCE...RADAR INDICATED ROTATION.

  IMPACT...FLYING DEBRIS WILL BE DANGEROUS TO THOSE CAUGHT WITHOUT
           SHELTER. MOBILE HOMES WILL BE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED.
           DAMAGE TO ROOFS...WINDOWS AND VEHICLES WILL OCCUR.  TREE
           DAMAGE IS LIKELY.

* THIS DANGEROUS STORM WILL BE NEAR...
  CISCO AROUND 515 PM CDT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is north of Granbury on its current heading, which targets areas W and WSW of DFW--areas that are less densely populated than areas due SW of DFW. I consider the first major population center in its path (Weatherford) part of the DFW metro area. And on second thought, the distance between the cell and more back-veer-back profiles to the north isn't very great, which gives me more confidence that the tornado threat is conditional and might be even shorter-lived than I suspected. You can see how cells to the N of the southernmost one are struggling to maintain their isolation. UL winds might back even more over the next few hours as the UL trough approaches. Such would be good news for DFW and other, smaller population centers.

 

Good grief just stop it... There's LOTS of towns, and ranches in this area of North Texas, it's not as sparcely populated as one would thing... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are any chasers or stations streaming on the Cisco cell?

 

What do you think? Does a bear take a crap in the woods?

 

Yeah, I'm not happy with the way you are going about things in here, in case you didn't notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...