ORH_wxman Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Yeah that's what I meant. In April, Impossible to be all rain in elevation anywhere in SNE and get 100% rain while other elevations got snow. It's never happened in Napril. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 LolFind one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 He was talking about a MLK type deal like in 2010 where you had a foot and I had rain. That would never happen in Napril I remembered '87 because Will talked about it before. It can and will happen. Besides you are in summer mode. You don't care anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapturedNature Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Pretty much what happened in '87. You did get some snow before the flip tho. Are you talking about 4/28/1987? It never fully flipped here. It mixed, but never fully flipped to just rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 Feb 2010? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Yeah that's what I meant. In April, Impossible to be all rain in elevation anywhere in SNE and get 100% rain while other elevations got snow. It's never happened in Napril.Midlevels never torched for you while remaining cold enough in ORH to support snow aided by its 1000' elevation? While maybe that hasn't ever happened verbatim, it doesn't mean it's impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Euro weeklies are advertising a pretty ugly gradient. By week four it appears the western ridge is back. Looks like a Tippy nightmare BD scenario. With analogs giving April 67 more weight it's not pretty. Price we pay for epicosity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 you might want to check for yourself for onceAt day 5? Overwhelmed by indifference. Talk to me Wednesday, bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 At day 5? Overwhelmed by indifference. Talk to me Wednesday, bud.then don't make ridiculous posts. I just posted what the GFS showed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I remembered '87 because Will talked about it before. It can and will happen. Besides you are in summer mode. You don't care anymore.I got nailed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 then don't make ridiculous posts. I just posted what the GFS showed.lol Man, settle down. Can't joke with you. Breathe into a paper bag...it's good for the soul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 lol Man, settle down. Can't joke with yoo. Breath into a paper bag...it's good for the soul99 whines and this ain't one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I got nailed that. Looks like I got a few inches in that. Blue Hill got 10..lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 99 whines and this ain't one99 dogs and your model interpretation is one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Looks like I got a few inches in that. Blue Hill got 10..lol.Will can confirm, but I want to say 7"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 99 dogs and your model interpretation is one99 shots at a record and you have none Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 It snowed 3 days in a row the last week of March. Can't recall that before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 99 shots at a record and you have noneLOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Not over yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Feb 2010? No, he's asking for one where it was 100% rain there and an ORH jackpot...which basically never happens anyway. Feb 2010, he had like 5" and then heavy rain while our area got 12"+. Even MLK 2010 was a bit of snow/sleet at the onset there...but probably 90% rain. Plus he wanted an April version. The sample of storms in April isn't very high...they had rain issues (or according to Metherb, mixing issues) in April 1987 which cut down on their accumulations while ORH got 17". This storm wasn't April, but close: March 30, 2001. I'm pretty sure they were almost all rain south of the pike in that one...maybe brief snow at the start and ORH was on the line the whole time. Like 6-8" of paste on the north side of town while a lot of sleet and rain was mixing in south side of town. Up by your area, it was about a foot of cement. I'd have to go through a list of all the April storms, but there can be latitude dependent storms in April...2007 certainly was. Elevation is definitely way more important, but Kevin is just spouting typical hyperbole again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Will can confirm, but I want to say 7"? 9.0" was what the coop reported in the 4/28/87 event...actually both Reading and Bedford had 9.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Started a pool at work for last remaining snow farm pile melt, one guy insists June, thinking May 10th. They are massive and they plowed yesterday to add more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 My area is a sneaky ok spot for spring deals. Best low elevation location in the nation. Hi, Bruce Edwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 My area is a sneaky ok spot for spring deals. Best low elevation location in the nation. Hi, Bruce Edwards Yep...a good area in general for all snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 I'm going to go ahead and call it. No more accumulating snow in SNE. All are donewell that was quick, NAM shows accumulating all over SCT Tuesday night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Yeah the rest of the parameters they show are pretty good because they just pull them directly from the GFS data at NCEP...but the snow maps are algorithms that are created by the vender. So the snow maps do not show "verbatim" solutions...they show what the vender algorithm interpretes as snow. QPF is verbatim, the snow amounts are not. Every algorithm is a bit different, and none of them are even that good. When you really think about it, it's a terrible idea for a graphic. Models are notoriously bad with QPF, so who thought it was a great idea to make snow (another very difficult weather element to forecast) graphics based on that QPF and maybe one other level? Your two most common "algorithms" are probably [iF 850 mb T < 0 C, then (QPF*10)] or [iF surface T ≤ 35 F, then (QPF*10)]. Pretty simplistic when you think about it. And anyone can get a hold of it and post it on the 6 PM news or throw it up on Facebook. Plus the fun new caveat is, "it's not my forecast, but this is what X model shows." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ma blizzard Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 0z GFS is still somewhat interesting for some accumulating snow early Sat morning . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Bonnet Blaster for PF, otherwise we torch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Bonnet Blaster for PF, otherwise we torch. Wish I could lock in that Euro run, lol. Warning criteria paste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.