mitchnick Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Thanks i will book it . but with 850 temps -10C to -11.5C, definitely we'll have ratios of 15:1, so 8-10", maybe 12" if we got lucky verbatim this run of course it will change plus, you are a bit east of BWI so every foot east will help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 yea but the low was probably further east than what the euro is showing right now for that storm im sure right? Yes, that one presented a more extreme scenario than this one.... 20" ACY, basically nothing in Philly and about 2-5" NYC/Long Island.... so not only further east but further south also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Just throwing this out there but the Euro looks like the 96' storm at 500mb. It could be that the precip is less and less widespread because the southern jet is weaker in la ninas...thought? '96 was also a Nina, though markedly weaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Does this resemble any of the storms from last winter? When I read what you wrote, with a storm intensifying that close to the coast, the storm I immediately thought of was the middle Feb storm last winter.... Feb 11, 2010. Two feet might be asking a bit much, but we've gotten a foot before in the kind of scenario youre depicting. I think it looks most like the 2/10 storm as you say, although the ECM is more of a Miller A while the GFS shows a later-blooming Miller B scenario. The models really need to work out at what exact latitude this Pacific energy is going to track across the Plains, which will influence where the coastal forms. The constant features seem to be the PNA ridge hooking up with the -NAO west, the strong northern stream energy entering the trough and amplifying it quickly, and the extremely cold air on the backside of the system with -16C 850s over NNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Just throwing this out there but the Euro looks like the 96' storm at 500mb. It could be that the precip is less and less widespread because the southern jet is weaker in la ninas...thought? 1996 was a la nina also-- albeit a weak one. La Ninas can be great if theyre weak (especially weak la ninas after el ninos like 1966-67, 1995-96), just imagine what this winter would have been like had the la nina stayed weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzie Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Yes, that one presented a more extreme scenario than this one.... 20" ACY, basically nothing in Philly and about 2-5" NYC/Long Island.... so not only further east but further south also. right so then that storm still does not provide support for this one because the low is not in the same place it is further west here and whenever the low is in this position the precip is almost always further west than what the models are showing at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAsnowlvr82 Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Not sure if its out but can someone post the qpf map when its available? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confuzzled Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Question for the METS: Does the euro always update that early on the raleigh site (or am I reading it wrong?) and is this current Euro solution screwing over CT / New England? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 '96 was also a Nina, though markedly weaker. During that 96 storm i was scheduled to fly out of JFK to go overseas to visit my then girlfriend and now wife and what usually takes 20 minutes to get to the train station took me 3 hours. When i finally got there Amtrak cancelled all their trains to NY. That will always be my favorite storm and probably the best i will see in my lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 1996 was a la nina also-- albeit a weak one. La Ninas can be great if theyre weak (especially weak la ninas after el ninos like 1966-67, 1995-96), just imagine what this winter would have been like had the la nina stayed weak. This winter will be plenty memorable if we get this storm to go along with a brutally cold December. I also see more threats for early January with the Siberian high building into Canada and bringing bitter air towards the Northern Plains and eventually the Northeast, with the Pacific still providing lots of fuel due to the ULL spinning in the Pacific Northwest/Gulf of Alaska. I really don't see any sign of the pattern breaking down to a mild SE ridge scenario, contrary to what La Niña climo says. We may have one of the coldest winters in recent memory if this blocking pattern continues as the models show it to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 1996 was a la nina also-- albeit a weak one. La Ninas can be great if theyre weak (especially weak la ninas after el ninos like 1966-67, 1995-96), just imagine what this winter would have been like had the la nina stayed weak. We also don't have much recent precedent for strong Ninas in constant -NAO regimes. Maybe the 1960s? Who knows, maybe the doom/gloom predictions for Jan/Feb could be wrong if the NAO stays negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 We also don't have much recent precedent for strong Ninas in constant -NAO regimes. Maybe the 1960s? Who knows, maybe the doom/gloom predictions for Jan/Feb could be wrong if the NAO stays negative. its not a strong NINA, its moderate http://www.cpc.ncep....dices/wksst.for you have to get a tri-monthly average in ENSO 3.4 of at least -1.5C, and we're not there and its proged to wane some too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 This winter will be plenty memorable if we get this storm to go along with a brutally cold December. I also see more threats for early January with the Siberian high building into Canada and bringing bitter air towards the Northern Plains and eventually the Northeast, with the Pacific still providing lots of fuel due to the ULL spinning in the Pacific Northwest/Gulf of Alaska. I really don't see any sign of the pattern breaking down to a mild SE ridge scenario, contrary to what La Niña climo says. We may have one of the coldest winters in recent memory if this blocking pattern continues as the models show it to. Well, I think we'll get a break in January for sure, since even weak la ninas like 1966-67 and 1995-96 featured less cold in January, but as Don said, extreme blocks tend to repeat themselves, so sometime later in Feb or March as the la nina is weakening we could get into a 1956-esque pattern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 not a met, but thats not updated from the raleigh site-allans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mencken_Fan Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Wasnt March 1960 that intense around that area? You may be thinking of the "Great Atlantic Coastal Storm" aka "Ash Wednesday Storm" of March 1962; the greatest Mid-Atlantic Nor'easter of all time. I was 10 at the time and went with my dad down to the coast after the storm. The barrier islands of Delaware were nearly obliterated. So many buildings I'd come to know during my summer vacations were gone...and I mean completely gone. That summer, heavy equipment was still dragging sand around. It took a long time to restore a semblance of normalcy. One wouldn't know it driving through today, but barely a structure was standing on that entire coast after that great Nor'easter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 During that 96 storm i was scheduled to fly out of JFK to go overseas to visit my then girlfriend and now wife and what usually takes 20 minutes to get to the train station took me 3 hours. When i finally got there Amtrak cancelled all their trains to NY. That will always be my favorite storm and probably the best i will see in my lifetime. I can't believe that living in Baltimore, one of those mutant HECS from last season didn't trump that one for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 You may be thinking of the "Great Atlantic Coastal Storm" aka "Ash Wednesday Storm" of March 1962; the greatest Mid-Atlantic Nor'easter of all time. I was 10 at the time and went with my dad down to the coast after the storm. The barrier islands of Delaware were nearly obliterated. So many buildings I'd come to know during my summer vacations were gone...and I mean completely gone. That summer, heavy equipment was still dragging sand around. It took a long time to restore a semblance of normalcy. One wouldn't know it driving through today, but barely a structure was standing on that entire coast after that great Nor'easter. That was an amazing multiday storm which was the 60s version of Dec 1991, but the storm I was thinking of dumped almost 3 feet of snow on Nantucket island.... it was a massively intensity late season noreaster that was the beginning of what some consider the "greatest 12 month period of weather" for the northeast...... the March 1960 snowstorm, then hurricane Donna in September, then the great 1960-61 winter with three KU events from Dec 1960 thru Feb 1961. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Question for the METS: Does the euro always update that early on the raleigh site (or am I reading it wrong?) and is this current Euro solution screwing over CT / New England? It's updated and SNE gets pounded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midlo Snow Maker Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 lets try to take the past storms talk to the regional threads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 Well, I think we'll get a break in January for sure, since even weak la ninas like 1966-67 and 1995-96 featured less cold in January, but as Don said, extreme blocks tend to repeat themselves, so sometime later in Feb or March as the la nina is weakening we could get into a 1956-esque pattern. I've been touting a huge march all year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombo82685 Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 im just curious why is the euro so far south with the low? Whats causing this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 not a met, but thats not updated from the raleigh site-allans YES IT IS LOOK AT THE DATES 0Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 That was an amazing multiday storm which was the 60s version of Dec 1991, but the storm I was thinking of dumped almost 3 feet of snow on Nantucket island.... it was a massively intensity late season noreaster that was the beginning of what some consider the "greatest 12 month period of weather" for the northeast...... the March 1960 snowstorm, then hurricane Donna in September, then the great 1960-61 winter with three KU events from Dec 1960 thru Feb 1961. 1992.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 havent seen this posted (unless i missed it) but 00z ensembles of gfs http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfsensemble/members/00zf126.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 I can't believe that living in Baltimore, one of those mutant HECS from last season didn't trump that one for you. Nope, IMBY i recieved 34 inches and it was windier than any of last years HECS so as a single storm it was my favorite. Of course as a winter im 99% sure this past winter will be one i will never even see anything close to again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 no... the r/s line is well off shore its all snow for you inall CT Question for the METS: Does the euro always update that early on the raleigh site (or am I reading it wrong?) and is this current Euro solution screwing over CT / New England? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 i stand corrected , i am surprised how quickly it updated on there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 1992.... yea sorry lol-- Will got like 3' in that one, but regardless of whether it was rain or snow, that was the most intense noreaster I have ever experienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzard-on-GFS Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 will long island see rain or now? The southern eastern tip may have some precip issues at the height of the storm but otherwise you should be mostly "now". haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted December 21, 2010 Share Posted December 21, 2010 00z nogaps is OTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.