Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,861
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Malkir008
    Newest Member
    Malkir008
    Joined

March 5th Snow Threat


WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 3/2/2015 at 3:43 PM, mitchnick said:

addressing a lot of the concerns, "yes" a lot of things can go wrong, but the model consensus is for a decent hit areawide, as in north-south-east-west of the I95 corridor, more so than anything we've seen so far this year

so relax as nobody can answer questions at this point as to which problems are the most likely

 

Ignoring the last clause of your post, surely temps are the more likely problem than precip?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2015 at 3:52 PM, stormtracker said:

damn..i'm way off...i was thinking 7/8z

should be pretty quick once 850s.. just going off maps tho. sfc lags a little but def well before that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2015 at 3:52 PM, WestminsterDeathband said:

GFS is a big hit.  I wonder if some of us will have to worry about a warm layer at 750mb for a while.

NAM has that ugly warm layer above 850, so although the NAM may be wrong verbatim, it's warmth above 850 is not necessarily completely off base

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/2/2015 at 3:53 PM, Ian said:

should be pretty quick once 850s.. just going off maps tho. sfc lags a little but def well before that. 

 

There might be a warm layer at 750-800 for a bit...something to keep an eye on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...