Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

3/1-2/2015 SWFE/Wave Discussion


SR Airglow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 542
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Along with improved 0z RGEM I posted above...

0z NAM Bufkit significantly improved over 18z / 12z:

KBOS 5.3" / 0.41 qpf

KPYM 3.8" / 0.65 qpf

KORH 4.3" / 0.43 qpf

KBDL 5.6" / 0.46 qpf

Don't really understand the KPYM total. I don't see much mixing anymore as the trends have been colder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone discussed this earlier... GFS very splotchy with QPF distribution, ironically the meso models RGEM/NAM have more evenly distributed QPF (and of course, higher amounts)

It's a tiny system with a tiny surface reflection maybe the resolution of the GFS is just too coarse to resolve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a tiny system with a tiny surface reflection maybe the resolution of the GFS is just too coarse to resolve it.

 

Exactly, that was my point about the irony.. coarse resolution relative to the meso-models, yet it has really consistent uneven spotted qpf distribution, compared to the higher-resolution NAM/RGEM which have more uniform distribution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't really understand the KPYM total. I don't see much mixing anymore as the trends have been colder.

 

Agree with you, was gonna post the same... I think areas like Ginx - Clinch do really well verbatim on 0z NAM

 

Also interesting that ratios are better overall in BOS than ORH, not sure I buy that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...