CCHurricane Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Yeah I'm just point out that James' nowcast wasn't bad, but got a little QPF queenish and assuming ratios that high is never a great forecast method. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 But to my eyes, that was common knowledge among the reputable Mets even yesterday afternoon. Most, if not all factored in the westward difference in precip vs. modeled. NWS nailed their calls, as well as most of the mets in Boston (as long as they didn't completely model hug...I'm looking at you Pete Bouchard / WHDH) What did Bouchard forecast this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCHurricane Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 What did Bouchard forecast this time I wish I saved it. Trace to a dusting for Boston with 1-2 inch swath south on the Cape. It's pretty clear what they do at the station is take the models output verbatim. Same reason why they consistently mess up big storms on the Cape. See 2005 blizzard, 8-16 inches of snow and we ended up with 36, and even this year with the January storm, 10-14 and we ended up with 26. Harvey Leonard and Matt Noyes are the only guys I really look to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.