Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Feb 25-26 Discussion/pbp


Wow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's hard to tell because of timing, but it could be compatible with NAM and GFS. It's definitely a big change, though. Then again, this is the same UKMET that drove a strong low into the apps last week...

Yep, I wish it was right though, we would get better front end and would get clipped when it's off the coast. We probably mix but either way would be good. Looks almost 1" QPF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's already down to 21 at RDU and clouds are definitely gone. I'll bet we'll drop into the upper teens by morning, especially with the snowpack. That's already well below SREF predictions and the NAM predictions by several degrees (both bottom us out at 24/25). If that plus the snowpack tomorrow keeps temps just a few degrees colder, perhaps maxing at 40 instead of 45, that could make a difference for ptype tomorrow night.

EDIT: there are still some clouds around, apparently, as temps are fluctuating back up a little bit. Still, we're on the colder side of the envelope already, so that's a plus either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you notice not one single prediction on snow amounts (for anywhere) that i saw in that forecast.  Not one.  We're 24hrs out.  Guess that's how they roll.  Not that there's anything wrong with that.

 

Honestly, why make a prediction when it's not starting in the Triangle til 9-10pm.  The virtually have another day to mull things over.  Probably a smart move on their part.  No need to jump the gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's already down to 21 at RDU and clouds are definitely gone. I'll bet we'll drop into the upper teens by morning, especially with the snowpack. That's already well below SREF predictions and the NAM predictions by several degrees (both bottom us out at 24/25). If that plus the snowpack tomorrow keeps temps just a few degrees colder, perhaps maxing at 40 instead of 45, that could make a difference for ptype tomorrow night.

 

The temperature shot from 23 to 25 once overcast rolled in here in the last hour, FWIW.

 

I don't really think BL temps will be a huge problem, though.

 

 

Honestly, why make a prediction when it's not starting in the Triangle til 9-10pm.  The virtually have another day to mull things over.  Probably a smart move on their part.  No need to jump the gun.

 

Maybe people should be able to plan?  A lot of the public probably thinks this storm is going to be no big deal at all now and they might be caught off-guard...

 

EDIT: Okay, I didn't realize they used probabilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, why make a prediction when it's not starting in the Triangle til 9-10pm.  The virtually have another day to mull things over.  Probably a smart move on their part.  No need to jump the gun.

Agreed. But I still think the forecaster's role is to warn reasonably rather than to deny and placate the naysayers. Safety first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. But I still think the forecaster's role is to warn reasonably rather than to deny and placate the naysayers. Safety first.

 

 

They did though.  They said Raleigh has an 89% chance of seeing 1" , per their model mean...82% or thereabouts for 2" and a 61% chance of 4" of snow.  Obviously they put it out there that the odds are we'll get snow.  Why focus on a number when everything shuts down here with 1/2" of snow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did though.  They said Raleigh has an 89% chance of seeing 1" tomorrow, per their model mean...82% or therabouts for 2" and a 61% chance of 4" of snow.  Obviously the put it out there that the odd are high that we'll get snow.  Why focus on a number when everything shuts down here with 1/2" of snow?

1/2" means I can get to the grocery store for food when I'm over 60 at most any time of the day. 3" does not. Public Safety. (edit) need to alert caregivers to care for their folks.. Not try to affirm a questionable model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1/2" means I can get to the grocery store for food when I'm over 60 at most any time of the day. 3" does not. Public Safety. (edit) need to alert caregivers to care for their folks.. Not try to affirm a questionable model.

Sorry to take this off topic.  We both make valid points. Go PACK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just made a really really fast image with straight lines of what my current thoughts for Wintry precip into SC are.  Not touching amounts with a ten-foot pole!  What do you guys think?  Am I way off, too far South?

 

I think a line going from anderson to union to lancaster for the heaviest snowfall above that and most likely to stay snow through out.  No clue about it going down into Columbia.  I think they will see snow at some point, but I don't know if it will accumulate.

 

I'm a little worried about temps even in the northern upstate.  Everyone talks about how the accumulation field would expand a great deal if it were .5-1° degree cooler, but what if it's warmer by that much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a line going from anderson to union to lancaster for the heaviest snowfall above that and most likely to stay snow through out.  No clue about it going down into Columbia.  I think they will see snow at some point, but I don't know if it will accumulate.

 

I'm a little worried about temps even in the northern upstate.  Everyone talks about how the accumulation field would expand a great deal if it were .5-1° degree cooler, but what if it's warmer by that much?

 

Thanks!  I have the "ew" thing around KCAE/More Central Midlands because I have no clue either.  I think you may be on to something bringing that heaviest snow line a bit North with a "curve' to it.  I just threw something quick together with straight lines to hopefully get an idea across.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS Raleigh is already hinting that they will probably be raising the snowfall totals for the triad and triangle areas because the models are coming in wetter.

from the 10:42 PM NWS Raleigh updated AFD.

THE LATEST MODELS CONTINUE TO SHOW WETTER SOLUTIONS FOR THE TRIAD AND TRIANGLE FOR WEDNESDAY NIGHT. IN ADDITION... THIS PATTERN SUGGESTS A BAND OF HEAVY WET SNOW ACCUMULATIONS JUST WEST AND NORTH OF THE EXPECTED "NARROW TRANSITION ZONE" BETWEEN SNOW AND RAIN BETWEEN 00Z AND 09Z/THURS. THE SE COUNTIES MAY STILL SEE MORE RAIN... BUT A TRANSITION TO SNOW AS THE LOW PASSES BY TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OVERNIGHT. MUCH MORE DETAILS COMING AS ALL THE DATA ARRIVES OVERNIGHT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21z SREF Mean Snowfall:

 

 

 

The mean snowfall is a bit deceptive because they still seems to be a spread among the members.  Almost all of the arw members show something like this:

 

iYA7yDQ.gif

 

Granted, this is overdone, but it does realize the potential here.  The NMM panels from the sref are total different with minimal snowfall for the most part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mean snowfall is a bit deceptive because they still seems to be a spread among the members.  Almost all of the arw members show something like this:

 

Granted, this is overdone, but it does realize the potential here.

 

Do you know which members should be more trusted in this situation?  I did notice that the three families of members were all pretty different.

 

---

 

00z ECMWF clown totals:

 

PGV: 11"

ATL: 6"

CLT: 6"

GSO: 4"

RDU: 7"

GSP: 5"

AVL: 4"

 

One thing I would note is that 850s are really cold for the northern fringes of the precip shield, so I guess it's possible there's decent ratios up there.  >2" makes it all the way up to Roanoke as the precip field continues to spread out on each successive Euro run.

 

It's also colder at the surface.  GSO gets down to 29 for a good portion of the storm with -7C 850s.  Looks like CLT and RDU are in the 30-32 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...