Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

NYC/PHL: December 24-27th Potential


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 992
  • Created
  • Last Reply

...POTENTIAL EAST COAST WINTER STORM AFTER CHRISTMAS...

MODELS SHOW REASONABLY GOOD LARGE-SCALE CONTINUITY IN ALLOWING AN

ANOMALOUSLY STRONG UPPER HIGH OVER GREENLAND TO WEAKEN DURING THE

EARLY STAGES OF THE MEDIUM RANGE PERIOD...WHICH THEN SLOWLY MERGES

WITH AN UPPER RIDGE BUILDING OVER CENTRAL NORTH AMERICA TOWARD THE

END OF THE PERIOD. THE RESULT IS A BLOCKING PATTERN AT THE HIGHER

LATITUDES WITH AN INTENSE POLAR JET STREAM TRAVERSING THE PACIFIC

NORTHWEST WHICH SPLITS...WITH THE SEPARATING FLOWS POSSIBLY

INTERACTING OR PHASING WITH THE SEPARATE STREAMS OVER THE EASTERN

CONUS.

ACROSS THE WEST...THE 12Z GFS IS ABOUT 12 HRS SLOWER THAN THE 12Z

ECMWF WITH THE LEADING EDGE OF A SIGNIFICANT SHORTWAVE TROUGH

REACHING THE NORTHWEST COAST DAY 4...WITH THE FASTER TIMING OF THE

ECMWF SUPPORTED BY THE 12Z CANADIAN/UKMET. THUS...RECOMMEND

DISCOUNTING THE SLOWER AND MORE AMPLIFIED GFS FOR THIS SYSTEM.

EXPECT MULTIPLE ROUNDS OF ADDITIONAL HEAVY PRECIPITATION TO

ACCOMPANY THIS TROUGH...ESPECIALLY ACROSS THE NORTHWEST WHERE 2-5

INCHES OF WATER EQUIVALENT IS ANTICIPATED FOR THE 5-DAY PERIOD

ENDING DAY 7.

IN THE EAST...THE MAIN ISSUE INVOLVES THE INTERACTION OR PHASING

OF MULTIPLE STREAMS OVER THE EASTERN CONUS...WHICH MAY RESULT IN A

SIGNIFICANT EAST COAST WINTER STORM BEGINNING DAY 4. OWING TO

UNCERTAINTY IN INITIAL CONDITIONS...DIFFERENCES IN MODEL

CONFIGURATIONS INCLUDING RESOLUTION...AND DIFFERENCES IN DATA

ASSIMILATION TECHNIQUES...DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE IN THIS REGION IS

UNUSUALLY SENSITIVE...WITH LARGE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL

MODELS...POOR RUN-TO-RUN CONTINUITY...AND LARGE ENSEMBLE SPREADS.

THUS...THE APPROACH FOR THE EASTERN CONUS SYSTEM IS TOWARD THE

MODEL CONSENSUS AND FORECAST CONTINUITY. THE ONLY ADJUSTMENT MADE

WITH THE FINAL PRESSURES/FRONTS PROGS IN THE EAST WAS TO NUDGE THE

FINAL POSITIONS AND INTENSITY OF THE DEVELOPING CYCLONE TOWARD A

CONSENSUS OF THE LAST 2 RUNS OF THE ECMWF/12Z CANADIAN/00Z ECMWF

ENSEMBLE MEAN...WITH THE FINAL POSITIONS CLOSEST TO THE 00Z ECMWF.

AFTER DISCOUNTING THE 12Z UKMET DUE TO ITS OUTLIER DEPICTIONS IN

MULTIPLE AREAS...THE 12Z ECMWF LIES NEAR THE SLOW OR SOUTHWESTERN

EDGE OF THE ENTIRE GUIDANCE ENVELOPE...AND GIVEN THE MULTIPLE

UNCERTAINTIES HIGHLIGHTED ABOVE...WOULD RATHER SEE ADDITIONAL

GUIDANCE COME INTO BETTER AGREEMENT WITH THE 12Z ECMWF BEFORE

USING ENTIRELY...WHICH IN TERMS OF PROBABILITIES...LIES WITHIN THE

LOWEST 10 PERCENT OF ALL SOLUTIONS...POSSIBLY A LITTLE LESS. IF

THE NEW ECMWF VERIFIES...THE FORECAST TRACK OF THE DEVELOPING LOW

WILL NOT CHANGE APPRECIABLY. HOWEVER...ITS SPEED WILL BE MUCH

SLOWER...RESULTING IN GREATER MOISTURE TRANSPORT FROM THE ATLANTIC

AND THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGHER QPF THAN CURRENTLY FORECAST.

JAMES

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is the Euro's deadly range? I didn't realize it extended past 100 hours.

I don't think the Euro has been good enough lately to say it has any deadly range. It has been just as inconsistent as all the other models. Remember for the last storm (Sunday) it showed a hit early on...then flipped to a miss for 6 runs in a row...then flipped to a mega hit...then flipped back to a miss. The Euro isn't what it used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Euro has been good enough lately to say it has any deadly range. It has been just as inconsistent as all the other models. Remember for the last storm (Sunday) it showed a hit early on...then flipped to a miss for 6 runs in a row...then flipped to a mega hit...then flipped back to a miss. The Euro isn't what it used to be.

So after the long-range stuff, the Euro was consistent throughout except for a one-run burp, and you are criticizing that performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS may be too suppressed. Adjusting the mean surface low track of the more northwestern cluster of its ensemble members 100 miles NW would take a 985-ish low from Hatteras to 39/70 rather than 40/70, which would at least mean all snow, but with the higher amounts across eastern Long Island.

:thumbsup::drunk::snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes actually because it was A. 2 runs back to back. one showed us getting a good hit the other a major blizzard and B. these runs were inside 72 hours. The GFS I would expect but if the Euro is king that sort of thing shouldn't occur. Hopefully it means nothing in regard to the current threat but you can't help but have it in the back of your mind.

So after the long-range stuff, the Euro was consistent throughout except for a one-run burp, and you are criticizing that performance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to judge consistency and accuracy, you really need to base your statement on a larger sample size. Simply stating one, two or three events will really not suffice. Then also consider the Euro comes out every 12 hours whereas the GFS is about every 6 hours. One could also argue that larger swings should be more frequent in the model that only updates twice a day because of the greater variations in data that can occur over 12 hour spreads, not 6. I believe plenty of the Mets have posted links or comparisons of models.

Well yes actually because it was A. 2 runs back to back. one showed us getting a good hit the other a major blizzard and B. these runs were inside 72 hours. The GFS I would expect but if the Euro is king that sort of thing shouldn't occur. Hopefully it means nothing in regard to the current threat but you can't help but have it in the back of your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only thing with the euro thats alarming is that it slows everything down so much more than any of the other models i believe. You speed this up a little bit and you have a further east solution and maybe ots. I think the gem might be more realistic imho

Agree with this, at this time. I know it's not the best model in the world, but it has the most realistic synoptic scenario, imo. It's closest to the Euro Ensemble mean, as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I never said the GFS was the better model, not by any means. All I'm saying is the Euro is not infallible.

If you are going to judge consistency and accuracy, you really need to base your statement on a larger sample size. Simply stating one, two or three events will really not suffice. Then also consider the Euro comes out every 12 hours whereas the GFS is about every 6 hours. One could also argue that larger swings should be more frequent in the model that only updates twice a day because of the greater variations in data that can occur over 12 hour spreads, not 6. I believe plenty of the Mets have posted links or comparisons of models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the only thing with the euro thats alarming is that it slows everything down so much more than any of the other models i believe. You speed this up a little bit and you have a further east solution and maybe ots. I think the gem might be more realistic imho

I don't disagree with that. I guess I was mostly referencing the massive chasm between the GFS and everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...