West Point, NY Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Latest RAP really taints LHV crushes NNJ and NWNJThats the Mid Hudson Valley. Clearly hits Rockland, Westchester hard also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleetStormNJ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 12Z NAM for EWR (Newark) is tainted beginning at 15 Hours (10pm)... The surface temp doesn't get above freezing the whole time but from 1000MB to 900MB it does so this will probably be sleet at the start and go to Freezing Rain per the NAM model output. Not saying I agree just reading the output and showing the different layers of the boundary layer. Before the taint .26 falls as snow and the rest of the qpf (.51) is tainted from 15 hours to 21 hours when the precip ends Station ID: KEWR Lat: 40.68 Long: -74.16 Elevation: 5.0 NAM Model Run: 12Z FEB 21, 2015 Forecast Hours: 0hr 3hr 6hr 9hr 12hr 15hr 18hr 21hr 24hr 27hr 30hr Sfc Prs(mb): 1030.8 1029.4 1026.7 1023.3 1020.7 1018.7 1017.1 1016.4 1017.3 1018.8 1018.6 Mean SLP (mb): 1033.7 1032.3 1029.6 1026.2 1023.5 1021.5 1019.9 1019.2 1020.1 1021.6 1021.4 2m agl Tmp (F): 7.4 18.0 24.6 26.7 27.1 30.5 31.5 31.5 31.1 31.9 32.3 2m AGL Dewpt(F): -1.8 9.9 16.8 25.1 26.0 29.9 30.9 31.1 30.4 30.6 31.1 2m agl RH (%): 66 70 72 93 96 98 98 98 97 95 96 10m agl W Dir: 230 181 192 183 180 201 282 311 274 311 273 10m agl Spd(kt): 2 8 9 11 8 4 2 2 2 3 3 3hr Precip (in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 AccumPrecip(in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.48 0.73 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.77 Precip H20 (in): 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 Best LI (C): 23.2 21.8 23.4 17.6 14.3 12.5 11.7 12.0 12.0 12.2 8.5 700mb VV(-ub/s): 0.5 -2.3 7.8 4.6 10.7 9.2 0.6 3.7 -2.7 -2.0 0.7 Thk1000-500mb(m)5237.1 5282.7 5318.0 5340.6 5368.5 5391.4 5406.4 5403.7 5390.0 5373.5 5368.3 Thk1000-850mb(m)1243.2 1251.9 1257.9 1266.5 1286.0 1304.4 1308.8 1300.5 1299.8 1297.3 1300.4 Thk850-700mb(m):1487.7 1505.1 1511.7 1525.6 1529.1 1525.5 1524.2 1533.4 1536.6 1539.8 1538.3 Heat Index (F): 7 18 25 27 27 30 32 31 31 32 32 1000mb GPH (m): 254 246 228 204 183 169 158 152 159 170 169 1000mb Temp (C): -10.8 -9.6 -6.5 -4.4 -3.7 -1.3 0.4 0.0 -0.1 -0.7 0.0 1000mb Dewpt(C): -21.6 -19.3 -10.8 -5.3 -4.2 -1.8 0.1 -0.3 -1.1 -2.6 -2.7 1000mb RH (%): 41 46 71 94 96 97 98 98 93 87 82 1000mb Dir: 207 186 192 189 187 204 234 272 286 321 304 1000mb Speed(kt): 15 15 13 19 15 11 10 9 7 7 4 975mb GPH (m): 448 441 426 403 384 372 362 355 362 373 372 975mb Temp (C): -11.6 -10.4 -8.3 -5.8 -4.3 -0.4 1.8 0.3 -0.8 -0.9 -0.1 975mb Dewpt(C): -22.0 -23.2 -11.6 -6.7 -4.9 -0.6 1.7 0.1 -2.3 -4.7 -4.6 975mb RH (%): 42 35 77 93 95 99 99 98 89 75 72 975mb Dir: 211 193 190 195 197 206 222 257 295 345 353 975mb Speed(kt): 16 23 16 27 24 26 27 22 15 14 7 950mb GPH (m): 646 641 627 606 588 580 572 563 569 580 580 950mb Temp (C): -13.0 -11.5 -9.5 -7.2 -3.5 1.6 2.9 0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.1 950mb Dewpt(C): -25.8 -24.7 -16.1 -8.5 -4.1 1.4 2.6 -0.2 -3.0 -4.5 -4.8 950mb RH (%): 34 33 59 91 96 99 98 97 79 72 69 950mb Dir: 215 196 193 199 207 207 225 262 303 331 305 950mb Speed(kt): 17 25 23 34 37 44 42 31 16 9 9 925mb GPH (m): 849 845 832 813 800 796 788 777 783 794 794 925mb Temp (C): -12.8 -11.6 -9.6 -8.6 -2.8 2.2 2.8 0.0 0.3 -0.4 -0.7 925mb Dewpt(C): -32.2 -29.8 -26.8 -9.8 -3.2 2.1 2.5 -0.6 -2.6 -4.4 -5.9 925mb RH (%): 19 21 24 91 97 99 98 95 80 74 68 925mb Dir: 219 202 202 204 212 209 231 263 277 280 278 925mb Speed(kt): 24 28 33 40 48 57 51 34 14 11 13 900mb GPH (m): 1058 1055 1044 1025 1017 1017 1009 996 1003 1013 1012 900mb Temp (C): -11.7 -10.0 -8.8 -9.1 -3.1 1.1 1.4 -0.5 -0.3 -1.2 -1.1 900mb Dewpt(C): -36.7 -33.4 -29.9 -10.3 -3.5 1.0 1.3 -1.4 -1.9 -4.8 -6.6 900mb RH (%): 11 13 17 91 97 99 99 94 89 77 66 900mb Dir: 221 207 210 211 217 213 235 254 256 267 275 900mb Speed(kt): 29 33 40 49 54 62 55 31 21 20 19 875mb GPH (m): 1274 1273 1262 1244 1240 1242 1236 1221 1228 1237 1237 875mb Temp (C): -10.7 -8.2 -8.8 -7.9 -3.1 -0.7 -0.2 -1.2 -1.0 -1.6 0.3 875mb Dewpt(C): -38.6 -35.1 -24.6 -9.0 -3.5 -0.9 -0.3 -1.9 -2.5 -5.7 -6.4 875mb RH (%): 9 10 27 92 98 99 100 94 89 73 61 875mb Dir: 223 212 211 221 228 217 236 246 250 264 265 875mb Speed(kt): 30 35 45 55 56 64 57 31 29 25 22 850mb GPH (m): 1497 1498 1486 1470 1469 1474 1467 1452 1459 1468 1470 850mb Temp (C): -9.7 -7.3 -10.8 -5.3 -2.5 -1.5 -1.7 -1.9 -1.7 -1.5 0.6 850mb Dewpt(C): -39.7 -40.0 -17.9 -5.9 -2.9 -1.7 -1.8 -2.7 -3.3 -5.5 -9.4 850mb RH (%): 7 6 56 96 97 98 100 94 89 74 47 850mb Dir: 226 219 211 231 240 222 238 238 248 258 264 850mb Speed(kt): 30 38 48 58 68 67 58 35 35 26 24 825mb GPH (m): 1728 1730 1715 1705 1707 1711 1704 1689 1696 1706 1709 825mb Temp (C): -9.9 -7.7 -9.4 -3.8 -2.3 -2.5 -3.0 -2.8 -2.5 -1.1 0.4 825mb Dewpt(C): -40.8 -33.0 -11.2 -4.0 -2.5 -2.8 -3.2 -3.8 -3.9 -5.3 -14.4 825mb RH (%): 6 12 87 98 99 98 99 93 90 73 32 825mb Dir: 230 224 212 239 240 230 237 233 247 253 263 825mb Speed(kt): 30 38 49 66 74 69 55 41 38 29 24 Some of that "tainted" QPF probably falls as snow still. But, yeah, definitely a troubling signal for prolonged icing and at a time when roads are generally awful and a lot of areas are depleted from using too much salt already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yanksfan Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Anyone agree with me that Upton should issue a winter storm warning for NYC? I think they should extend the WSW throughout the rest of northern jersey which I think they might do later on this afternoon. NYC is right on the fence in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 I still like a TTN to MMU JP and not because I live there, look at the radar. It will snow the hardest there for the longest period of time. The further East you go time is not on your side because temps will gradually warm as we head into tonight. Not an all out torch, but I expect a lot of CNJ and LI to crack freezing, with mid 30's on the south shore of LI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowWisher Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 NYC is similar but certainly looks icy with temps staying below freezing.. 3-4" first then taint. Station ID: KNYC Lat: 40.78 Long: -73.96 Elevation: 47.0 NAM Model Run: 12Z FEB 21, 2015 Forecast Hours: 0hr 3hr 6hr 9hr 12hr 15hr 18hr 21hr 24hr 27hr 30hr Sfc Prs(mb): 1032.7 1031.4 1028.7 1025.4 1022.7 1020.6 1019.1 1018.2 1019.1 1020.6 1020.3 Mean SLP (mb): 1033.7 1032.4 1029.7 1026.4 1023.7 1021.6 1020.1 1019.1 1020.1 1021.6 1021.3 2m agl Tmp (F): 8.8 19.2 25.1 26.9 27.7 30.7 30.9 30.9 30.6 32.0 32.9 2m AGL Dewpt(F): 0.1 10.9 17.8 25.3 26.5 30.5 30.1 30.2 29.6 30.5 31.7 2m agl RH (%): 68 70 74 94 95 99 97 97 96 94 95 10m agl W Dir: 215 182 193 184 182 202 299 315 282 309 283 10m agl Spd(kt): 2 8 9 11 9 4 2 2 1 3 3 3hr Precip (in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.19 0.22 0.26 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 AccumPrecip(in): 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.24 0.45 0.72 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Precip H20 (in): 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 Best LI (C): 23.5 21.9 23.6 19.1 14.8 12.8 12.3 11.8 12.0 12.3 8.4 700mb VV(-ub/s): 0.8 -2.6 6.7 4.1 9.8 9.5 2.5 2.8 -3.0 -2.1 0.8 Thk1000-500mb(m)5232.9 5279.8 5316.0 5337.3 5365.8 5389.2 5404.5 5403.5 5389.1 5372.1 5367.7 Thk1000-850mb(m)1242.7 1252.0 1259.1 1266.0 1284.8 1303.6 1308.5 1300.4 1299.1 1296.8 1300.0 Thk850-700mb(m):1486.4 1503.9 1509.6 1523.4 1528.0 1525.1 1523.9 1533.3 1535.8 1539.3 1538.3 Heat Index (F): 9 19 25 27 28 31 31 31 31 32 33 1000mb GPH (m): 254 246 229 205 185 170 159 151 159 170 168 1000mb Temp (C): -10.5 -9.6 -6.3 -4.3 -3.4 -1.5 -0.1 -0.3 -0.4 -1.1 -0.5 1000mb Dewpt(C): -21.4 -17.5 -10.5 -5.1 -3.9 -1.8 -0.5 -0.7 -1.4 -2.9 -2.7 1000mb RH (%): 41 53 72 94 96 98 97 97 93 87 85 1000mb Dir: 209 187 191 189 188 201 243 276 290 318 305 1000mb Speed(kt): 15 14 14 20 17 12 9 8 7 7 4 975mb GPH (m): 448 442 427 404 385 372 362 354 361 373 371 975mb Temp (C): -11.6 -10.4 -8.1 -5.6 -4.3 -0.5 1.7 0.4 -0.6 -1.1 -0.3 975mb Dewpt(C): -21.9 -22.2 -11.4 -6.5 -4.9 -0.7 1.6 0.1 -2.4 -5.2 -5.4 975mb RH (%): 43 38 77 94 95 99 99 98 88 74 69 975mb Dir: 212 193 190 195 197 205 224 256 294 339 8 975mb Speed(kt): 16 22 17 29 26 26 27 21 16 15 7 950mb GPH (m): 646 641 628 608 590 581 572 563 569 580 579 950mb Temp (C): -13.0 -11.7 -9.3 -7.1 -3.8 1.4 3.1 0.2 0.1 -0.1 0.1 950mb Dewpt(C): -26.2 -24.4 -15.7 -8.3 -4.4 1.2 2.9 -0.2 -3.2 -4.4 -4.9 950mb RH (%): 33 34 60 91 96 98 98 97 79 73 69 950mb Dir: 215 196 192 199 207 208 224 262 302 324 309 950mb Speed(kt): 17 24 24 36 37 43 43 30 16 10 10 925mb GPH (m): 849 845 834 815 801 796 789 776 783 793 793 925mb Temp (C): -12.8 -11.7 -9.4 -8.5 -3.0 2.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 -0.5 -0.5 925mb Dewpt(C): -34.1 -31.1 -29.0 -9.8 -3.5 1.9 2.6 -0.8 -2.7 -4.5 -5.8 925mb RH (%): 16 19 19 91 96 99 98 94 81 74 67 925mb Dir: 219 202 202 203 214 211 230 263 277 279 276 925mb Speed(kt): 24 29 33 41 48 57 51 33 14 10 13 900mb GPH (m): 1058 1055 1046 1027 1018 1017 1010 996 1002 1012 1011 900mb Temp (C): -11.8 -10.2 -8.6 -9.2 -3.6 0.6 1.3 -0.6 -0.5 -1.2 -1.1 900mb Dewpt(C): -38.6 -34.5 -39.7 -10.6 -4.0 0.4 1.1 -1.6 -2.1 -4.8 -6.6 900mb RH (%): 9 12 6 90 97 99 99 93 89 77 66 900mb Dir: 221 208 210 209 218 213 234 256 256 267 275 900mb Speed(kt): 29 33 40 49 54 61 56 31 22 20 19 875mb GPH (m): 1274 1273 1264 1245 1240 1242 1236 1221 1227 1237 1236 875mb Temp (C): -11.1 -8.3 -8.4 -8.3 -3.9 -0.8 -0.4 -1.2 -1.2 -1.7 0.1 875mb Dewpt(C): -40.3 -35.4 -29.5 -9.6 -4.2 -1.0 -0.5 -2.0 -2.4 -5.7 -6.6 875mb RH (%): 7 10 17 91 97 98 99 94 92 74 61 875mb Dir: 223 213 211 218 229 217 235 247 250 264 267 875mb Speed(kt): 30 36 44 56 56 63 57 31 30 25 22 850mb GPH (m): 1497 1498 1488 1471 1470 1474 1467 1452 1458 1467 1468 850mb Temp (C): -9.8 -7.4 -10.5 -6.1 -2.8 -1.7 -1.7 -1.8 -1.8 -1.6 0.5 850mb Dewpt(C): -40.1 -40.3 -19.5 -6.8 -3.2 -1.9 -1.8 -2.7 -3.2 -5.7 -9.2 850mb RH (%): 7 6 48 95 97 98 99 94 90 74 48 850mb Dir: 227 219 211 229 240 222 236 238 247 258 265 850mb Speed(kt): 30 37 47 57 68 66 59 35 36 26 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgwp96 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 With this mornings trends Maybe now most will be happy and the bickering will stop lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Thats the Mid Hudson Valley. Clearly hits Rockland, Westchester hard also I respectfully disagree, extreme southern rockland and westchester are ok on the rap, North of that taints... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 it's going to be a very tight cutoff over Orange County, all of the modeling has it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 it's going to be a very tight cutoff over Orange County, all of the modeling has it. Yea gonna blow lol... RGEM is probably the best for our area up here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Freezing rain could be a bigger problem than people are thinking right now. I think the same thing as yesterday.....2-4" for most areas with 5" as you head SW with some areas 6". I'm not sure we completely flip over to plain rain in NNJ. One thing.....As the majority of this thread's posts consist of people arguing over if they see an inch or two more than someone else blah blah blah.....I don't think there will be 2" in one area, and 5" nearby.....Naturally we'll have an area that receives a heavier band or two, but I don't think anyone will receive an obscene amount of snow, nor do I think anywhere in the vicinity will receive barely anything (in our areas at least). The ground is very cold and while I could see the mixing coming in sooner than some are thinking, I also think the mixing will last longer. Either way, it warms up tomorrow and refreezes tomorrow night. Be safe out there everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Anyone agree with me that Upton should issue a winter storm warning for NYC?No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Why is anyone using anything other then the Rgem is beyond me. It's the best model we have and is locked in. 4"-8" snowfall coming for the entire region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Another noticeable tick colder on the GFS for NYC and LI. Keep in mind GFS tends to be high with surface temps. I recall with the last marginal event that gfs mos guidance was easily 3F too warm at the surface inside 24 hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Rgem bullseye in westchester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Why is anyone using anything other then the Rgem is beyond me. It's the best model we have and is locked in. 4"-8" snowfall coming for the entire region. Agree. 3-6/4-8 inches look really likely based off the Nam, GFS and RGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Point, NY Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Anyone agree with me that Upton should issue a winter storm warning for NYC?Yeah, when you agreed with climatology that you shouldn't expect more than 2 feet of snow for a whole winter where you live and stop acting like you are gypped every storm that doesn't produce 25-100 percent of your annual average . your average high is around 43 now. Let's face reality.I shouldn't expect good pizza and you shouldn't expect 4 or 5 feet of snow a year in Brooklyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Rgem solid 3-6" area wide with westchester seeing 6" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chietanen Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 12z GFS looks snowier for most of you guys as well. Regarding that sucker zone, in my opinion it's unlikely to verify over Orange county. I doubt the elevation there is significant enough to cause shadowing. If anything, that would be more likely over Ulster county, northeast of the Catskills. Going to come down to nowcasting for those of us in the Hudson valley. Could go either way. At least we stay all snow it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 it's going to be a very tight cutoff over Orange County, all of the modeling has it.Looks like a big cutoff in Rockland, hate to say it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 12z GFS looks snowier for most of you guys as well. Regarding that sucker zone, in my opinion it's unlikely to verify over Orange county. I doubt the elevation there is significant enough to cause shadowing. If anything, that would be more likely over Ulster county, northeast of the Catskills. Going to come down to nowcasting for those of us in the Hudson valley. Could go either way. At least we stay all snow it looks like. Comepletely agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Yeah, when you agreed with climatology that you shouldn't expect more than 2 feet of snow for a whole winter where you live and stop acting like you are gypped every storm that doesn't produce 25-100 percent of your annual average. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnionWeatherWx Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Idk I'm hearing 2-4" yet I'm seeing 6"+ on some models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Why is everyone hugging the nam...serious question. .why is the gfs and euro being tossed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravitylover Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Rgem bullseye in westchester Great. I'll be driving through there in a sports car between 7:30 and ...? depending on how bad the roads are. Thankfully one of my favorite things to do is drive in heavy snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Idk I'm hearing 2-4" yet I'm seeing 6"+ on some models. Yea nam and rgem are drastically different in terms of snow for NNJ, WNJ and EPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 One thing is for sure the HRRR isn't too enthused with any decent snow rates here til 23z or so but it has sucked recently, the RAP which has been better is more aggressive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravitylover Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 this board is unbearable - never seen people bicker so much.. is everyone under the age of 12? No but I have been 14 for ~34 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnionWeatherWx Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Why are we still looking at models anyway, look at the radar, it's now cast time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 Looking quickly 12z GFS and RGEM seem similar am I wrong? Snowfall wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted February 21, 2015 Share Posted February 21, 2015 The mets seemed to be taking blends it would seem and will wait to adjust totals upwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.