Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 16-17 Storm Threat


WxUSAF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Situation like this you almost have to use a blender approach since not one solution has locked in.

 

Isn't a blended approach basically saying, "We don't know yet, so we're going to split the difference until we have more data?" I'm not saying it's the wrong way to handle a forecast, but a blended approach isn't the magic bullet to actually get the forecast correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't a blended approach basically saying, "We don't know yet, so we're going to split the difference until we have more data?" I'm not saying it's the wrong way to handle a forecast, but a blended approach isn't the magic bullet to actually get the forecast correct. 

Sometimes the forecast isn't correct. Remember back in the day when in winter storm situations, a "revised" forecast would be issued, when needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't a blended approach basically saying, "We don't know yet, so we're going to split the difference until we have more data?" I'm not saying it's the wrong way to handle a forecast, but a blended approach isn't the magic bullet to actually get the forecast correct.

It gives an opportunity to give weight to each model...example...40% nam, 25% GFS, 25% euro, 10% previous forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...