Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,112
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Valentine's Day weekend storm discussion part 2


Sickman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 2/15/2015 at 2:04 AM, ag3 said:

Nam basically cancels the storm for SNE also.

 

Parts of that area got their 3-5" already... I'm sitting on a dusting over a glaciated pack ... kind of a bootleg winter here, a real low budget film compared to the epic blockbuster of a season they've had. 

 

/vent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another good Iron Rule of Forecasting to remember before a potential snowstorm in NYC is: "Choose the model that yields either the least or second least amount of snow."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:06 AM, danstorm said:

Parts of that area got their 3-5" already... I'm sitting on a dusting over a glaciated pack ... kind of a bootleg winter here, a real low budget film compared to the epic blockbuster of a season they've had. 

 

/vent

Literally, , at most , have scratched out 1/2 inch in Kew gardens. awaiting the squall and the IVT & putting on my ptimistic patient face :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:06 AM, Pamela said:

Another good Iron Rule of Forecasting to remember before a potential snowstorm in NYC is: "Choose the model that yields either the least or second least amount of snow."

 

Growing up near Danbury, Ct., I'd have agreed with this ... though I've lived here for 5 winters now and many times NYC has been a snow magnet, as I'm sure you are aware.

 

Awaiting retort with esoteric movie quote...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would not take a huge shift north to throw some snows up over Long Island after midnight...all the 0z models ingested the same data...so I would not entirely rule out some snows out there overnight...I mean its not like there is some 1035 mb anticyclone over Quebec pushing everything out to sea.  It might still brush parts of the area overnight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:07 AM, BxWeatherwatcher said:

relax people the snow is coming,the squall is actually regaining its form coming off the mountains and moving east but you wouldnt know it by the reactions on here. :lol:

We get SOMETHING.....key word something.....around an inch for many of us. It's a bust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:09 AM, Pamela said:

It would not take a huge shift north to throw some snows up over Long Island after midnight...all the 0z models ingested the same data...so I would not entirely rule out some snows out there overnight...I mean its not like there is some 1035 mb anticyclone over Quebec pushing everything out to sea. It might still brush parts of the area overnight.

You get nothing, you lose! Good day sir!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:09 AM, danstorm said:

Growing up near Danbury, Ct., I'd have agreed with this ... though I've lived here for 5 winters now and many times NYC has been a snow magnet, as I'm sure you are aware.

 

Awaiting retort with esoteric movie quote...

 

Danbury is a snow town...I always draw a line from Danbury to the Delaware Water Gap and say, "N&W of this line, most years will have an adequate amount of snow."  It is north of that line that decent winters year after year can generally be anticipated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:00 AM, Snow88 said:

Nam says no snow for nyc

 

 

I like how people react with posts of "relax" when reality is being interjected.  This will probably still yield an inch or two with the arctic front but it won't be the event numbers that many were touting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:10 AM, IsentropicLift said:

You get nothing, you loose!

 

I measured 3.2 inches earlier in the day; so it was far from a complete loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/15/2015 at 2:12 AM, danstorm said:

You can't spell, you lose harder!

 

He was trying to make an allusion to a 1971 film about chocolate, I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...