Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Mid FEB through March Threats/Snow Storms


mitchnick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Guess you are not too optimistic. You really think that it will be OTS

That is the trend. I want for us to get drilled but we have been screwed all winter. Why would it change now. I don't like the progressive nature of the trough. Ridge out west not amped enough and the low could very well be a southern slider. How many elongated fast moving southern lows actually work out for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree it's 1 run but the fact that it's 18z is irrelevant. The runs are what they given the conditions at the time. This run factored in stronger confluence.

The point is why panic over ONE run of ONE model when there isn't even a consensus yet on a storm that is days away unless you truly believe that this is the final solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the trend. I want for us to get drilled but we have been screwed all winter. Why would it change now. I don't like the progressive nature of the trough. Ridge out west not amped enough and the low could very well be a southern slider. How many elongated fast moving southern lows actually work out for us?

Good enough. I am in no position to argue anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the red tagger above this post seems to think panic is in order. Who am I to argue?

Having a storm produce a solid hit at day 5 and 6 in the models has been a trend all season...only to fade away as we draw near. Not saying it won't happen but it hasn't worked out yet. There aren't any good signals for it. Cold high moves off the coast, western ridge not too amped and nothing to really phase or block in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a storm produce a solid hit at day 5 and 6 in the models has been a trend all season...only to fade away as we draw near. Not saying it won't happen but it hasn't worked out yet. There aren't any good signals for it. Cold high moves off the coast, western ridge not too amped and nothing to really phase or block in.

This is really only the second or third solid five day hit..and it probably will fade. But yeah I agree with all of the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem really is that most of the vorticity is up in the great lakes and progressively pushing the southern energy east.  Ideally I would think we would want to see that vorticity consolidated at the base of the trough along the gulf of mexico.  I guess there's still time for some sort of phase to occur, but the signals aren't really there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we're rooting for the northern stream further west and the southern stream quicker so it  phases. This is the kind of solution that will jump 200 miles inside 72hrs. The +AO and +NAO make it hard for DC to get a snowstorm, but it can still happen.

Right, models don't "trend" for five days up through verification. They're still in the jumping around range. The trending happens in the shorter term when actual forecast amounts need to be disseminated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd favor a less than great solution but it is early. I however don't think we want to see the southern wave speed up at this pt it's running away and getting deflected.

Might highlight a problem with declaring a huge pattern change for the better tho. N stream still seems to be dominant and messing with stuff even if we do have some southern juice to play with in theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count, there were 7 gfs members that were good...at different time frames.

I don't care, I'm only interested in the one that has the bomb over the Shenandoah. It won't verify but it's awesome to look at, and I can deal with the change to rain if I get   20"  in 6 hrs.first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah..a computer model making a forcast. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What were the looks of those 7 good members, as far as the evolution, strength and track of the lows? Just trying to figure out what to pull for here.

Looked like pretty classic tracks for good snows in the area. All were about the same....timing was only diff. I only briefly looked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...