yankeex777 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 The run was certainly colder than 6z. Very odd long duration event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 The GGEM is more amped up than 00z. So far on Monday night there is a surface low over West Virginia and signs of a weak transfer towards the coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 The run was certainly colder than 6z. Very odd long duration event. We've moved onto the GGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 Weak coastal East of the benchmark, misses everyone, but it's really digging the trailing energy so it's probably going to try and develop another low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaPo Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 Lmao people arguing over 12z gfs 5days out smh Really? Personally I'm frustrated by the different interpretations of one model run. I know it's a discussion board, but pbp should be done by well revered posters or mets. Too much hyperbole and not enough analysis. The trends seem to be indicating a weaker overrunning event right now. Coastal is too far south and east at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 The 00z GGEM did this and it spun up a strong coastal for Tuesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 We're going to get snow one way or another with this pattern. I'm not so focused on every single model and every single run because all the little details will drive you crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 We get nailed by the coastal but it has precip type issues for pretty much everyone. 850's are cold this run but somehow the surface torches. Doesn't make much sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowblind Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 We need to sit back and relax a little. I think by fri 12z we should know a bit more. I wouldnt trust any model to specific at this point in time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkd Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 can someone put up a snow map? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 We get nailed by the coastal but it has precip type issues for pretty much everyone. 850's are cold this run but somehow the surface torches. Doesn't make much sense. The CMC is notorious for doing that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 If I had to put money on it I would bet this evolves like that event in 2011, the overrunning will end up missing us to the north and we will be sent into another dimension by the coastal, I think the event I'm thinking of the NWS busted severely and all the overrunning snow fell 30-50 miles north of NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pstar3182 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 gfs_asnow_us_25.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 The CMC is notorious for doing that Yeah, I'm going to call BS here. The GGEM has 2-4" LE from the two events, highest amounts over NE PA and NW NJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 If I had to put money on it I would bet this evolves like that event in 2011, the overrunning will end up missing us to the north and we will be sent into another dimension by the coastal, I think the event I'm thinking of the NWS busted severely and all the overrunning snow fell 30-50 miles north of NYC was that the 1/27/11 event? We had about 5-7 inches overrunning that morning (largely unforecast) and then got destroyed by the coastal that evening/overnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 was that the 1/27/11 event? We had about 5-7 inches overrunning that morning (largely unforecast) and then got destroyed by the coastal that evening/overnight. No there was an event 2 weeks later maybe where all the overrunning ended up over CT and the Hudson valley but models had it over NYC up until maybe 36 hours before then moved it north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zir0b Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 12z navgem looks good with the lead overruning wave, miss with the coastal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob1 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 was that the 1/27/11 event? We had about 5-7 inches overrunning that morning (largely unforecast) and then got destroyed by the coastal that evening/overnight.I believe you're talking about Feb 2010, NYC got 20 inches from that after a day of rain that turned to wet snow and didn't start sticking till it got very heavy that night. There was an insane west to east cutoff with the Catskills getting 4-6 feet of snow and heavy rain east of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 The GGEM just keeps going and going and going until eventually we dry slot before the coastal moves in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 The GGEM just keeps going and going and going until eventually we dry slot before the coastal moves in. GGEM dumps 3 feet of snow N and W of NYC lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 GGEM dumps 3 feet of snow N and W of NYC lol 4FT HV and NEPA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 12Z GFS Text Output at Newark - Continuous Light Snow From Just After Midnight Sunday Till about Noon Tuesday - 60 hours - yielding just under an inch qpf. Temperatures below freezing from late 2/5 through 2/20 with additional snow chances during that period . http://wxweb.meteostar.com/sample/sample.shtml?text=kewr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 12z GFS for KLGA, not a foot + like some people were saying. 150208/0600Z 90 VRB02KT 28.1F SNOW 11:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 11:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.02 100| 0| 0150208/0900Z 93 06003KT 29.2F SNOW 7:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.057 8:1| 0.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.08 100| 0| 0150208/1200Z 96 04008KT 28.1F SNOW 8:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.084 8:1| 1.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.16 100| 0| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---150208/1500Z 99 05012KT 25.4F SNOW 5:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.056 7:1| 1.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.21 100| 0| 0150208/1800Z 102 05011KT 23.1F SNOW 4:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.035 7:1| 1.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.25 100| 0| 0150208/2100Z 105 05011KT 20.6F SNOW 9:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.037 7:1| 2.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.29 100| 0| 0150209/0000Z 108 05012KT 17.3F SNOW 15:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.044 8:1| 2.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.33 100| 0| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---150209/0300Z 111 05012KT 15.5F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.051 8:1| 3.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.38 100| 0| 0150209/0600Z 114 05012KT 15.0F SNOW 5:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.025 8:1| 3.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.41 100| 0| 0150209/0900Z 117 05012KT 15.3F SNOW 6:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.042 8:1| 3.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.45 100| 0| 0150209/1200Z 120 05011KT 16.2F SNOW 8:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.033 8:1| 3.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.48 100| 0| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---150209/1500Z 123 05012KT 19.3F SNOW 7:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.036 8:1| 3.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.52 100| 0| 0150209/1800Z 126 05013KT 22.0F SNOW 9:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.044 8:1| 4.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.56 100| 0| 0150209/2100Z 129 04014KT 23.6F SNOW 14:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.025 8:1| 4.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.59 100| 0| 0150210/0000Z 132 04013KT 24.9F SNOW 11:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.077 8:1| 5.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.66 100| 0| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---150210/0300Z 135 04014KT 25.1F SNOW 12:1| 1.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.080 9:1| 6.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.74 100| 0| 0150210/0600Z 138 03014KT 23.1F SNOW 6:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.062 8:1| 6.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.81 100| 0| 0150210/0900Z 141 03014KT 22.7F SNOW 5:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.035 8:1| 7.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.84 100| 0| 0150210/1200Z 144 03013KT 24.2F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.050 8:1| 7.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.89 100| 0| 0----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+---150210/1500Z 147 02014KT 26.3F SNOW 10:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.024 8:1| 7.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.91 100| 0| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsteff Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 A few reasons... 1) Those weenie WxBell maps assume a 10:1 ratio which is not always correct, in fact most of the time it's wrong. 2) The WxBell maps count sleet as snow. 3) In general snowfall amounts are nearly impossible to forecast more than a day in advance, and sometimes even hours in advance as slight changes in temperature profiles and mesoscale features can have large implications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SR Airglow Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 12z GFS for KLGA, not a foot + like some people were saying. 150208/0600Z 90 VRB02KT 28.1F SNOW 11:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 11:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.02 100| 0| 0 150208/0900Z 93 06003KT 29.2F SNOW 7:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.057 8:1| 0.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.08 100| 0| 0 150208/1200Z 96 04008KT 28.1F SNOW 8:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.084 8:1| 1.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.16 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 150208/1500Z 99 05012KT 25.4F SNOW 5:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.056 7:1| 1.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.21 100| 0| 0 150208/1800Z 102 05011KT 23.1F SNOW 4:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.035 7:1| 1.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.25 100| 0| 0 150208/2100Z 105 05011KT 20.6F SNOW 9:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.037 7:1| 2.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.29 100| 0| 0 150209/0000Z 108 05012KT 17.3F SNOW 15:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.044 8:1| 2.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.33 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 150209/0300Z 111 05012KT 15.5F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.051 8:1| 3.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.38 100| 0| 0 150209/0600Z 114 05012KT 15.0F SNOW 5:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.025 8:1| 3.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.41 100| 0| 0 150209/0900Z 117 05012KT 15.3F SNOW 6:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.042 8:1| 3.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.45 100| 0| 0 150209/1200Z 120 05011KT 16.2F SNOW 8:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.033 8:1| 3.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.48 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 150209/1500Z 123 05012KT 19.3F SNOW 7:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.036 8:1| 3.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.52 100| 0| 0 150209/1800Z 126 05013KT 22.0F SNOW 9:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.044 8:1| 4.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.56 100| 0| 0 150209/2100Z 129 04014KT 23.6F SNOW 14:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.025 8:1| 4.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.59 100| 0| 0 150210/0000Z 132 04013KT 24.9F SNOW 11:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.077 8:1| 5.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.66 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 150210/0300Z 135 04014KT 25.1F SNOW 12:1| 1.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.080 9:1| 6.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.74 100| 0| 0 150210/0600Z 138 03014KT 23.1F SNOW 6:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.062 8:1| 6.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.81 100| 0| 0 150210/0900Z 141 03014KT 22.7F SNOW 5:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.035 8:1| 7.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.84 100| 0| 0 150210/1200Z 144 03013KT 24.2F SNOW 6:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.050 8:1| 7.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.89 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 150210/1500Z 147 02014KT 26.3F SNOW 10:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.024 8:1| 7.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.91 100| 0| 0 Probably because for some reason it's assuming 5:1 ratios for a lot of it which is completely unrealistic considering 850s and surface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 Probably because for some reason it's assuming 5:1 ratios for a lot of it which is completely unrealistic considering 850s and surface. 850's aren't that cold, 8:1 is just the average ratio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CIK62 Posted February 4, 2015 Share Posted February 4, 2015 GFSx is 18" around here but refers to precipitation type with a 'Z' throughout. What does this mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted February 4, 2015 Author Share Posted February 4, 2015 GFSx is 18" around here but refers to precipitation type with a 'Z' throughout. What does this mean? ZR would be freezing rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.