Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

January 31st-February 2nd overrunning snow event


Thundersnow12

Recommended Posts

Any one who has followed winter weather for a long time knows that mother nature likes persistence. We are in a non phased winter pattern...despite what some model runs like to show. Some winters phased storms are the norm...not this winter.You would think it would eventually change. My guess is...not this winter.

Lets not make ignorant posts please. Yesterday we just had a major blizzard plow through the Northeast for christ sakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 989
  • Created
  • Last Reply

One of the Vorts for this system is currently between Hawaii and the Aleutian Islands.  It is not modeled to be on shore until Friday afternoon in British Columbia.   Sampling in the middle of the Pacific is not much.  We will continue to get large variations until things get better sampled.  It may go either way but lets not cancel because of one GFS run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may be right but it should be easy to understand how no one will have faith in this storm until within 24 hours given how things have played out this winter in general.

with re: to the nor' easter model performance, which has IMO been blown way out of proportion, as has been stated here. 30-40 miles east of NYC, there's 2'+. If the same shift would have been here it would have been meh! Plus, those type of storms are notoriously hard to exact. I wouldn't say the models completely failed there.

4-5 days out still, there's going to be model discrepancies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If mother nature is going to flip us the bird. At least she's doing it now so we don't have to waste our time the next 2-3 days I guess that's one positive way to look at it :lol:

I was just thinking about that lol.. But yeah you know the drill.... I dont think we're that lucky to get a system like 00z gfs last night showed lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just for the record, I'm not punting anything or jumping off any cliffs yet as far as this storm. I'm merely expressing why I'm not getting emotionally invested in this storm, as far as getting worked up over the expected erratic model flip-flopping. That way, if the storm craps out, I won't be disappointed and if it produces well, I'll be pleasantly surprised (as it's not one of those setups where any possible solution is a lock).

If others choose to have a different perspective, more power to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with re: to the nor' easter model performance, which has IMO been blown way out of proportion, as has been stated here. 30-40 miles east of NYC, there's 2'+. If the same shift would have been here it would have been meh! Plus, those type of storms are notoriously hard to exact. I wouldn't say the models completely failed there.

4-5 days out still, there's going to be model discrepancies.

 

Philly was expecting around a foot, and barely got some snowshowers, it was overblown a bit due to unrealistic snow maps as well, but it's frustrating that it was the Euro that screwed it up that time.  Makes it hard to give any model an edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to stop playing the "this is how its gone this winter" card. Each storm and each setup will always be different.

You know that's not totally true. We've seen it before... If you're in a pattern that had missed phases all season, there's a greater chance of it continuing than not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets not make ignorant posts please. Yesterday we just had a major blizzard plow through the Northeast for christ sakes

To be fair, it must be acknowledged that was a completely different setup (and completely different shortwaves).

Thus, it has no bearing on whatever potential this upcoming system has...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone recall any well-phased snowstorms prior to the blizzard of 99?

 

I was just going to say this.

 

 

Philly was expecting around a foot, and barely got some snowshowers, it was overblown a bit due to unrealistic snow maps as well, but it's frustrating that it was the Euro that screwed it up that time.  Makes it hard to give any model an edge.

 

<weenie>

 

The GGEM did the best with the coastal.

 

</weenie>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know that's not totally true. We've seen it before... If you're in a pattern that had missed phases all season, there's a greater chance of it continuing than not.

 

Eh. I'll still make the case that each storm and setup is always different no matter what's happen the past several months. 

 

Wasn't it fairly bad before GHD? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone recall any well-phased snowstorms prior to the blizzard of 99?

As stated above, that was a completely different synoptic setup and pattern we were in...

NOT saying it can't happen again, but IMO I'd rather judge this upcoming storm's potential based on:

1. Its merits (the strength/evolution of its shortwave energy)

2. What the overall pattern in place will support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just for the record, I'm not punting anything or jumping off any cliffs yet as far as this storm. I'm merely expressing why I'm not getting emotionally invested in this storm, as far as getting worked up over the expected erratic model flip-flopping. That way, if the storm craps out, I won't be disappointed and if it produces well, I'll be pleasantly surprised (as it's not one of those setups where any possible solution is a lock).

If others choose to have a different perspective, more power to them.

 

 

This is sensible.  Not saying to completely forget seasonal trends, but it's true that no 2 setups are exactly the same.  Better than punting 4-5 days out over 1 model run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. I'll still make the case that each storm and setup is always different no matter what's happen the past several months.

Wasn't it fairly bad before GHD?

From a teleconnection standpoint (PNA, AO,NAO), it actually resembles this storm a bit. During the GHD storm, we had a similar trough position in the west with the PV hanging by up north.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Wasn't it fairly bad before GHD? 

 

ORD had 25.8" on the season going into GHD.

 

December 2010 was pretty good for quite a few as well. One of the snowiest on record here due to the continuous MSP-QC-LAF-IND-CVG clipper train.

 

Doesn't matter though because the pattern was clearly different in Dec...and then it changed at the end of Jan to allow something like GHD to happen. Same thing when we think about Jan 1999. The season was a disaster up until that point...and then went back into the crapper two weeks after...only to revive again for the first week or two of March.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ORD had 25.8" on the season going into GHD.

 

December 2010 was pretty good for quite a few as well. One of the snowiest on record here due to the continuous MSP-QC-LAF-IND-CVG clipper train.

 

Yeah just went back and looked at that January. Besides the 5.9" on 1/11 it was a fairly quiet snow month. Decent 4-5 day stretch of a half inch or so everyday later in the month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah just went back and looked at that January. Besides the 5.9" on 1/11 it was a fairly quiet snow month. Decent 4-5 day stretch of a half inch or so everyday later in the month. 

 

It was the ultimate penny and nickel January around here, though the frequency made it a better snow month than this year's January so far (though we'll see if we add any Jan 31st).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take 2-4" off the southeast MI/Detroit area as it has that falling with this first system tomorrow. 

 

attachicon.gif12z gem snow.png

 

even though we get the warm tongue shoved up our cabooses with that solution....I'd take that over the gfs solution any day.  Verbatim the ggem would probably front end dump us, change over and back end us as well.   At least it would offer something other than a snooze fest.

 

Also with that high pressure configuration...probably lots of low level cold fighting it's way in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...