Nygmen Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 this was pretty much a nemo redux except a little lower totals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danstorm Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Maybe where you at? Because i have mod snow in Brooklyn Forest Hills... We actually came in with a respectable total in this heartbreaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmillz25 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Forest Hills... We actually came in with a respectable total in this heartbreaker. At this point ill take anything we can get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 IMO this was a fairly well modeled event, with respect to certain variables. But many of us, MYSELF INCLUDED ignored the red flags this storm put up for those of us that got shafted. 1) the NAM wavered several times leading up to the event 2) miller Bs are especially difficult to extend wester precip especially with no real blocking 3) 6-12 hrs before event not a single short term liked the euros track of the western shield People maintain the euro held its course... Well so did the GFS. The GFS had guidance from the ukmet, rap, nam(for a few runs), HRRR, GGEM, RGEM as well as most srefs caving towards the GFS... I truely feel a blend of the GFS/EURO would have been the right call.. It would have kept the intensity for Manhattan eastward that the euro had and the GFS was lacking, yet maintained that strong western precip cutoff the GFS had yet the euro was lacking. To discredit the euro from here out is insane, it's still the best model for east Coast storms IMO, and unfortunately has suffered a rare lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 As far as busts go it's not like there weren't warning signs from most of the other models. The forecasters and forecasting agencies decided to focus on two of them and their forecasts were far too aggressive. I don't care though I still got a nice storm in and it's still snowing here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 As far as busts go it's not like there weren't warning signs from most of the other models. The forecasters and forecasting agencies decided to focus on two of them and their forecasts were far too aggressive. I don't care though I still got a nice storm in and it's still snowing here. Hence my post above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Wow at Hartford, only 5" reported at BDL as of 7am. W CT and W MA really got shafted too with this. The super band looks to have set up in the western Boston suburbs out to ORH and E CT, and Suffolk County LI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 22.5" on my snowboard in Kings Park, Suffolk County out on Long Island. A very good storm but far from historic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 My sister has over 2 feet out in Smithtown. I have less than 6" here. What a waste of time. Spring can't come fast enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 22.5" on my snowboard in Kings Park, Suffolk County out on Long Island. A very good storm but far from historic. 22.5 inches is a HECS for us bro...we live on li not in minnesota LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 IMO this was a fairly well modeled event, with respect to certain variables. But many of us, MYSELF INCLUDED ignored the red flags this storm put up for those of us that got shafted. 1) the NAM wavered several times leading up to the event 2) miller Bs are especially difficult to extend wester precip especially with no real blocking 3) 6-12 hrs before event not a single short term liked the euros track of the western shield People maintain the euro held its course... Well so did the GFS. The GFS had guidance from the ukmet, rap, nam(for a few runs), HRRR, GGEM, RGEM as well as most srefs caving towards the GFS... I truely feel a blend of the GFS/EURO would have been the right call.. It would have kept the intensity for Manhattan eastward that the euro had and the GFS was lacking, yet maintained that strong western precip cutoff the GFS had yet the euro was lacking. To discredit the euro from here out is insane, it's still the best model for east Coast storms IMO, and unfortunately has suffered a rare lose One could also say that those that laughed at the GFS scored a partial win also. To discredit it would also be wrong in this example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 One could also say that those that laughed at the GFS scored a partial win also. To discredit it would also be wrong in this example. Hence why a blend of the 2 would have been a better call, both failed in their own respects.. GFS failed on central Long Island, and most of the immediate nyc area, while the euro clearly failed on the western precip shield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenCtyWx Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 I'm in utter disbelief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 About a foot of snow here in Queens so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 22.5 inches is a HECS for us bro...we live on li not in minnesota LOL You have more snow that`s going to swing through . Anytime you end with 25 inches of snow on the coastal plain it`s Historic . For those NW its historic too one they soon forget . Lived through March 01 and that one still stings . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 You have more snow that`s going to swing through . Anytime you end with 25 inches of snow on the coastal plain it`s Historic . For those NW its historic too one they soon forget . Lived through March 01 and that one stings . exactly lol im going to finish with 22-24 inches...HECZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 You have more snow that`s going to swing through . Anytime you end with 25 inches of snow on the coastal plain it`s Historic . For those NW its historic too one they soon forget . Lived through March 01 and that one stings . Its definitely a fantastic storm out here...I mean at 1:20 AM I had 8 inches new and things were boring...a most intense band blew in from the east that seemed right out of the tidal wave in The Posiedon Adventure...and its been unbelievably snowy ever since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastKU Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Snowing heavy as hell in Nassau county... Well over a foot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messiah94 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Over a foot here in Nassau/ West Hempstead as well. I would think he Islander/Ranger game tonight at the Coliseum should be cancelled. Snowfall totals are really starting to add up not only in Suffolk but seems Nassau is getting into some nicer totals as well now. Alot of people traveling not a good idea. One thing though the Rangers stayed in Uniondale so they would be ready to play. Dont know how much of a crowd though. Also they could play tomorrow. Coliseum is not planned for anything. Both teams would fly right out after and play road games next night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Looks like HRRR still wants to give another 0.1 - 0.25" of QPF across the New York Metro. http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/lb13_img/hrrr/hrrr_ncep_refl_flt.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastCoastKU Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Messiah this is some of the heaviest snow we've seen all storm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messiah94 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Messiah this is some of the heaviest snow we've seen all storm! Definitely! Seems there has been a band over our area for over an hour that seems to expand just as it looks to weeken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Pretty quiet in the UES. Would love to get another white out band Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 22.5 inches is a HECS for us bro...we live on li not in minnesota LOLI know where I live lol. Check snowfalls for Suffolk county last 30 years. It's major, not historic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 I know where I live lol. Check snowfalls for Suffolk county last 30 years. It's major, not historic. This area is subject to much bigger individual snowstorms than just about anywhere in the state of Minnesota...save for maybe right around Lake Superior & Duluth...though...being on the wrong side of the lake makes it a bit harder than if they were downwind of it. Still, I would venture that this area has had far more 18 inch snowstorms than Duluth...and way more than somewhere away from the water like the Twin Cities simply because there is insufficient moisture available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 This area is subject to much bigger individual snowstorms than just about anywhere in the state of Minnesota...save for maybe right around Lake Superior & Duluth...though...being on the wrong side of the lake makes it a bit harder than if they were downwind of it. Still, I would venture that this area has had far more 18 inch snowstorms than Duluth...and way more than somewhere away from the water like the Twin Cities simply because there is insufficient moisture available. Of course Duluth much snowier overall than this area...they average around 80 inches but more favored areas with good fetches off the Lake do better. Minneapolis more in the upper 40's annually I would think...maybe a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyblizz44 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Forest Hills... We actually came in with a respectable total in this heartbreaker.same here in Kew Gardens 10.4 but what a huge disappointment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Light to snow falling here back home in Carteret NJ, estimated accumulation right around 6.0" snow has picked up in intensity a bit and keeping an eye on that heavier snow developing over the city just to my northeast. Have about 6" here, also, maybe 5-6 miles SW of you (assuming you're in Carteret). Measured from 4-8" with an average around 6". My corroboration of 6" is that we had a solid 4" last night after part 1, by 8 pm, and I got home from the local pub around 9 pm and my car had 2" of fresh snow on top of it this morning. Blizzard, lol. Haven't waded through the threads, yet, but has anyone done a half decent post mortem yet? Was it track, intensity (if either of those, why?) or much stronger and drier air being replenished from our NW, robbing us of moisture, or something else (aliens, gremlins, etc.)? Clearly, the "storm" kicked ass from Suffolk County through New England with 18-30" or more and serious blizzard conditions. The NWS predictions were essentially off by ~60 miles, as the expected snow in eastern PA is what we got ~60 miles to the east in NE NJ near the Hudson, and the snow we expected in NE NJ was received from eastern Nassau and points eastward, ~60 miles to our east. If the track was off by 60 miles that might explain it - not saying it was, just noting the differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY-LES FREAK Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 22.5 inches is a HECS for us bro...we live on li not in minnesota LOL I agree, definitely Not Historic, but formidable with much much more to come!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Have about 6" here, also, maybe 5-6 miles SW of you (assuming you're in Carteret). Measured from 4-8" with an average around 6". My corroboration of 6" is that we had a solid 4" last night after part 1, by 8 pm, and I got home from the local pub around 9 pm and my car had 2" of fresh snow on top of it this morning. Blizzard, lol. Haven't waded through the threads, yet, but has anyone done a half decent post mortem yet? Was it track, intensity (if either of those, why?) or much stronger and drier air being replenished from our NW, robbing us of moisture, or something else (aliens, gremlins, etc.)? Clearly, the "storm" kicked ass from Suffolk County through New England with 18-30" or more and serious blizzard conditions. The NWS predictions were essentially off by ~60 miles, as the expected snow in eastern PA is what we got ~60 miles to the east in NE NJ near the Hudson, and the snow we expected in NE NJ was received from eastern Nassau and points eastward, ~60 miles to our east. If the track was off by 60 miles that might explain it - not saying it was, just noting the differences. It came down to track. The track shifted approximately 50-75 miles east from Upton and Mt Holly s projections. To be fair to both sides, the computer models began to show us this was going to swing wide right on Sunday evening. On the other hand, the low pressure, for all intensive purposes, stayed on the western edge of guidance until the last minute. It closed off at H7 ahead of schedule and closed off at H5 right on schedule and in a very good location for the area. The problem became that it opened up at H5 and then shifted East before closing off once more. This was also very evident when the Jersey Shore was about to get hit by that very strong band, that just translated East at around 2300 last night.Edit: I should add that the dry air from the artic high, combined with the subsidence created by the intense banding did not help. That is why I don't like when they forecast gradual cut off s with these storms. There's usually a very sharp cutoff due to the subsidence created. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.