stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I listened to their forecast and they never said anything about that... Still have the same amounts and stated blizzard conditions after 10pm Yeah they said radar trends and nowcasting will need to be your friend in figuring out where the best bands set up. But they are calling for 1-2 ft in NYC metro. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelocita Weather Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Central Park at 4.3" as of 4pm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I agree. NWS is choosing the solution that probably makes the most sense based upon how past storms have behaved (Bill's post yesterday about the heaviest snow often being west of the guidance), how things are currently developing, and which models have done best so far. . Bill said the best forcing on the western side was only seen by the European and was being missed by all the models , TBF the SREFs were there to some degree . The NAM got this today and is ALL IN ,I hope it`s right . But look if the Euro is right its 18 at KNYC ( Where they already have 4.3 ) and 25 on Long Island if the NAM is right is 25 at KNYC and 30 on Long Island . Hurricane force S of Montauk , Lightning tonite regardless , 2- 4 inch per hour rates and 55 MPH gusts from the city E . That's your floor and ceiling . I like it ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoulderWX Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Bill said the best forcing on the western side was only seen by the European and was being missed by all the models , TBF the SREFs were there to some degree . The NAM got this today and is ALL IN ,I hope it`s right . But look if the Euro is right its 18 at KNYC ( Where they already have 4.3 ) and 25 on Long Island if the NAM is right is 25 at KNYC and 30 on Long Island . Hurricane force S of Montauk , Lightning tonite regardless , 2- 4 inch per hour rates and 55 MPH gusts from the city E . That's your floor and ceiling . I like it ..... that's your floor and ceiling if you're ONLY using those two models - if you want to lean on them sure, but to discount ALL other guidance, you'r a braver man than I -- good thing is, no need to debate it, we'll know in less than 18 hours.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 You have to give it time to close off then you get the blossoming deform the Nam shows. It's a wait and see game if it happens west enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2015012618/gfs_apcpn_neus_6.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Accuweather NY Jeff Smith and Lee Goldberg says very difficult forecast, however since there are signs of the band that is in LI/NYC/NJ now diminishing, it is supportive of a further east development of the precip for New England. Showed the NAM run and said they are leaning away from a band developing so far west.....Said they are just waiting for radar confirmation to change anything, but there are already signs of the heaviest bands developing over New England and pulling the slug of moisture NE for them. These guys are not amateurs so if they are seeing something, it can't be "tossed" I just watched that segment and that's not what they said. Just saying. Nothing personal bc I like your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRRTA22 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I can't post any images right now, but I'm staring at a 700mb cyclonic wind field. (Albeit weak) Ah I see , thank you for the reply. Really don't see the NAM/Euro losing this one, even if they might be just a tad bit too west. Like you stated, alot of time left for the low to close off for the perfect scenario for EWR east and even west of there 15"+ looks good Dont see GFS scoring a coup with this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GFS is already a bust. Places have seen over 4 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mranger48 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Larry cosgrove on fb just said the low is forming over Moorhead city, "forming west of predicted center which seals the fate of NYC and LI" Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ENYsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 21Z surface analysis: down to 996 hPa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Bill said the best forcing on the western side was only seen by the European and was being missed by all the models , TBF the SREFs were there to some degree . The NAM got this today and is ALL IN ,I hope it`s right . But look if the Euro is right its 18 at KNYC ( Where they already have 4.3 ) and 25 on Long Island if the NAM is right is 25 at KNYC and 30 on Long Island . Hurricane force S of Montauk , Lightning tonite regardless , 2- 4 inch per hour rates and 55 MPH gusts from the city E . That's your floor and ceiling . I like it ..... I like it, as well. Even if NYC slips into the 12"-18" category in the end, that would still be a major storm. I suspect we'll be at or above 20" and possibly quite a bit higher if the banding develops and moves over the City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Nam really has the radar exploding between 7-10pm....see what happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 that's your floor and ceiling if you're ONLY using those two models - if you want to lean on them sure, but to discount ALL other guidance, you'r a braver man than I -- good thing is, no need to debate it, we'll know in less than 18 hours.. I like UPTONS take . This happens at the beginning of every storm . The radar hasn't fully filled in and everyone runs to the worst models and pull the fire alarm . This is a dynamic system and even if the NAM is roided up I have the Euro in my pocket. Upton has to some degree dismissed the GFS since 12z yesterday. That gives me insight on how I should be looking at this. In 4 or 5 hours this should fill and then we start counting . 1 thing though there is already 3 to 5 around the area with that 1 small slug of moisture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJWxWatcher201 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Definitely at least 4" here in southern Bergen county . hoping to cash in big! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Larry cosgrove on fb just said the low is forming over Moorhead city, "forming west of predicted center which seals the fate of NYC and LI" Sent from my iPhone What the heck does that imply. seals the fate as in what Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Yuck http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/lb13_img/hrrr/hrrr_ncep_refl_flt.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottynic Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 how can News 12 have such a big difference in totals.. http://newjersey.news12.com/weather Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Madness Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Bernie Rayno @AccuRayno · 17m17 minutes ago satellite looking more and more impressive. meanwhile evidently the HRRR is looking less impressive. I trust actual weather over models. Bingo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://climate.cod.edu/flanis/satellite/reg/index.php?type=northeast-ir-48 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/s19/700mb/700mb.gif?1422312336164 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smoof Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Yuck http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/lb13_img/hrrr/hrrr_ncep_refl_flt.php The HRRR at 10-15hrs has been way too dry for the few systems here I have followed it this year in the 10+ hour range, it has always trended wetter hour by hour, I wonder if the NWS gave it an "upgrade" this year.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The HRRR at 10-15hrs has been way too dry for the few systems here I have followed it this year in the 10+ hour range, it has always trended wetter hour by hour, I wonder if the NWS gave it an "upgrade" this year.... There is a problem with the HRRR for coastal cyclones. Remember radar reflectivity is integrated into its initial conditions, where it prescribes a latent heating profile that corresponds to the reflectivity. However when most of the precipitation is offshore, the HRRR can only see what the radar sees: the upper level portion of the of cloud producing precip. Thus it wouldn't be surprising if the HRRR is underestimating the latent heat release occurring with the ongoing precipitation offshore, ultimately resulting in a weaker more eastward cyclone. Some food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/new/viewsector.php?sector=19 SPC RAP prog surface map for midnight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 looping the radar on weathertap - there is almost no progression west with regards to the band over extreme SNE.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 A quick note regarding the HRRR... So far, it hasn't been verifying very well in terms of total snowfall. Actual accumulations: 000 NOUS41 KOKX 262231 PNSOKX CTZ005>012-NJZ002-004-006-103>108-NYZ067>075-078>081-176>179-271031- PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT SPOTTER REPORTS NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NEW YORK NY 531 PM EST MON JAN 26 2015 THE FOLLOWING ARE UNOFFICIAL OBSERVATIONS TAKEN DURING THE PAST 10 HOURS FOR THE STORM THAT HAS BEEN AFFECTING OUR REGION. APPRECIATION IS EXTENDED TO HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS...COOPERATIVE OBSERVERS...SKYWARN SPOTTERS AND MEDIA FOR THESE REPORTS. THIS SUMMARY IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON OUR HOME PAGE AT WEATHER.GOV/NYC ********************STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL******************** LOCATION STORM TOTAL TIME/DATE COMMENTS SNOWFALL OF /INCHES/ MEASUREMENT CONNECTICUT ...FAIRFIELD COUNTY... BRIDGEPORT AIRPORT 0.8 400 PM 1/26 COOP NEW JERSEY ...BERGEN COUNTY... EAST RUTHERFORD 2.6 350 PM 1/26 PUBLIC SADDLE BROOK 2.4 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER RIDGEWOOD 2.4 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FRANKLIN LAKES 2.2 321 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NEW MILFORD 1.8 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ENGLEWOOD 1.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER MONTVALE 1.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER MIDLAND PARK 1.4 224 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FORT LEE 1.2 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WOODCLIFF LAKE 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER RAMSEY 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...ESSEX COUNTY... CEDAR GROVE 2.0 340 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NEWARK AIRPORT 1.8 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER MAPLEWOOD 1.5 430 PM 1/26 PUBLIC ...HUDSON COUNTY... NORTH BERGEN 3.1 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...PASSAIC COUNTY... RINGWOOD 1.5 500 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WAYNE 1.5 340 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WOODLAND PARK 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER NEW YORK ...NASSAU COUNTY... BETHPAGE 4.0 354 PM 1/26 PUBLIC HICKSVILLE 4.0 450 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER PLAINVIEW 4.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BELLEROSE 3.4 500 PM 1/26 PUBLIC MALVERNE 3.1 430 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER EAST MEADOW 3.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BELLMORE 3.0 450 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FLORAL PARK 2.0 345 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER NORTH MASSAPEQUA 0.8 100 PM 1/26 NWS EMPLOYEE ...NEW YORK COUNTY... CENTRAL PARK 4.3 400 PM 1/26 CENTRAL PARK ZOO ...ORANGE COUNTY... GREENVILLE 2.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...QUEENS COUNTY... REGO PARK 4.8 514 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BAYSIDE 4.0 449 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FRESH MEADOWS 3.0 300 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NYC/LA GUARDIA 2.5 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER WHITESTONE 2.0 230 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NYC/JFK AIRPORT 1.8 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER BELLAIRE 1.1 200 PM 1/26 PUBLIC ...ROCKLAND COUNTY... SLOATSBURG 1.5 500 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER STONY POINT 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...SUFFOLK COUNTY... NORTH BABYLON 2.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER PATCHOGUE 2.0 330 PM 1/26 NWS EMPLOYEE ISLIP AIRPORT 2.0 400 PM 1/26 ASOS UPTON 1.3 500 PM 1/26 NWS OFFICE $ AL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 can you please match that up with what the 18Z NAM has at 22Z for h7 http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/s19/700mb/700mb.gif?1422312336164 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 There is a problem with the HRRR for coastal cyclones. Remember radar reflectivity is integrated into its initial conditions, where it prescribes a latent heating profile that corresponds to the reflectivity. However when most of the precipitation is offshore, the HRRR can only see what the radar sees: the upper level portion of the of cloud producing precip. Thus it wouldn't be surprising if the HRRR is underestimating the latent heat release occurring with the ongoing precipitation offshore, ultimately resulting in a weaker more eastward cyclone. Some food for thought. Bingo. Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 A quick note regarding the HRRR... So far, it hasn't been verifying very well in terms of total snowfall. Actual accumulations: 000 NOUS41 KOKX 262231 PNSOKX CTZ005>012-NJZ002-004-006-103>108-NYZ067>075-078>081-176>179-271031- PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT SPOTTER REPORTS NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NEW YORK NY 531 PM EST MON JAN 26 2015 THE FOLLOWING ARE UNOFFICIAL OBSERVATIONS TAKEN DURING THE PAST 10 HOURS FOR THE STORM THAT HAS BEEN AFFECTING OUR REGION. APPRECIATION IS EXTENDED TO HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS...COOPERATIVE OBSERVERS...SKYWARN SPOTTERS AND MEDIA FOR THESE REPORTS. THIS SUMMARY IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON OUR HOME PAGE AT WEATHER.GOV/NYC ********************STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL******************** LOCATION STORM TOTAL TIME/DATE COMMENTS SNOWFALL OF /INCHES/ MEASUREMENT CONNECTICUT ...FAIRFIELD COUNTY... BRIDGEPORT AIRPORT 0.8 400 PM 1/26 COOP NEW JERSEY ...BERGEN COUNTY... EAST RUTHERFORD 2.6 350 PM 1/26 PUBLIC SADDLE BROOK 2.4 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER RIDGEWOOD 2.4 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FRANKLIN LAKES 2.2 321 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NEW MILFORD 1.8 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ENGLEWOOD 1.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER MONTVALE 1.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER MIDLAND PARK 1.4 224 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FORT LEE 1.2 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WOODCLIFF LAKE 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER RAMSEY 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...ESSEX COUNTY... CEDAR GROVE 2.0 340 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NEWARK AIRPORT 1.8 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER MAPLEWOOD 1.5 430 PM 1/26 PUBLIC ...HUDSON COUNTY... NORTH BERGEN 3.1 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...PASSAIC COUNTY... RINGWOOD 1.5 500 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WAYNE 1.5 340 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER WOODLAND PARK 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER NEW YORK ...NASSAU COUNTY... BETHPAGE 4.0 354 PM 1/26 PUBLIC HICKSVILLE 4.0 450 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER PLAINVIEW 4.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BELLEROSE 3.4 500 PM 1/26 PUBLIC MALVERNE 3.1 430 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER EAST MEADOW 3.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BELLMORE 3.0 450 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FLORAL PARK 2.0 345 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER NORTH MASSAPEQUA 0.8 100 PM 1/26 NWS EMPLOYEE ...NEW YORK COUNTY... CENTRAL PARK 4.3 400 PM 1/26 CENTRAL PARK ZOO ...ORANGE COUNTY... GREENVILLE 2.0 330 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...QUEENS COUNTY... REGO PARK 4.8 514 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER BAYSIDE 4.0 449 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER FRESH MEADOWS 3.0 300 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NYC/LA GUARDIA 2.5 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER WHITESTONE 2.0 230 PM 1/26 PUBLIC NYC/JFK AIRPORT 1.8 400 PM 1/26 FAA CONTRACT OBSERVER BELLAIRE 1.1 200 PM 1/26 PUBLIC ...ROCKLAND COUNTY... SLOATSBURG 1.5 500 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER STONY POINT 1.0 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER ...SUFFOLK COUNTY... NORTH BABYLON 2.5 400 PM 1/26 TRAINED SPOTTER PATCHOGUE 2.0 330 PM 1/26 NWS EMPLOYEE ISLIP AIRPORT 2.0 400 PM 1/26 ASOS UPTON 1.3 500 PM 1/26 NWS OFFICE $ AL I think it`s a little light there is 4 in Brooklyn 5 in Queens and up on the North shore in Nassau County . There is prob 5 at the park by now . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boreal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://climate.cod.edu/flanis/satellite/reg/index.php?type=northeast-ir-48 Great loop. Thanks for posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.