pazzo83 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 NYC is barely 1.00" on the GFS. Toss it in the trash where it belongs. What a piece of crap. We'll have half that before 7pm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 wow ok...the nam was also THE ONLY MODEL THAT HAD THIS BAND HITTING US TODAY...AT THIS POINT IF U WERE MAKING A FORECAST EVERY MODEL SHOULD BE TOSSED EXCEPT THE EURO AND NAM...AND THATS NOT BEING A WEENIE UPTON FULLY AGREES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeysed Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Lol I got my 3" already but thanks anyway GFS. What did you measure? I am at 3.4 here in Long hill right next door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMG11 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What's your take on it ? NAM (and the euro kind of ready to fight, but reluctant) vs GFS and most other models.....To be honest, if the NAM did not show a ridiculous amount of snow I think we'd toss it (if all of the other models showed 30" and the NAM showed 10").....It's hard to accept that it would be a solution VS all else, considering it's accuracy.....But, this storm has come a long way..... The NAM is in a more accurate range.. This is its bullseye zone. And i'd say that even if the totals were much less. Again, look at the radar. Look at the negative tilt... Look at its tendencies and intentions. Superstorm93 has been posting excellent illustrations of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The met on news 12 says only9-10 inches Trenton to New Brunswick...he really slices the amounts maybe up to 16 in nj towards nyc...says this moving a jog east.....he will lose his job if New Brunswick gets 18..hero or a goat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 yea bros the euro and its ensembles arent busting 12 hours out after being consistent for days...toss everything but that and cut the nams qpf in half...IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Wow Upton is going all in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Lol I should have saved all the nam is trash posts from yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCG RS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What's your take on it ? NAM (and the euro kind of ready to fight, but reluctant) vs GFS and most other models.....To be honest, if the NAM did not show a ridiculous amount of snow I think we'd toss it (if all of the other models showed 30" and the NAM showed 10").....It's hard to accept that it would be a solution VS all else, considering it's accuracy.....But, this storm has come a long way.....Dynamics dynamics. The GFS does not have the resolution to see what this storm is doing, at least not correctly. The NWS is following the NAM and Euro and I see no reason not to either. Yes the NAM can have some major issues, but with how it is lining up with all other current conditions, it's currently verifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What did you measure? I am at 3.4 here in Long hill right next door.It's hard to get a measurement with the drifting but I got an average of around 2.6". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveWinter Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 When the GFS initializes, does it not see the band over LI and NYC?? So strange that these models are still, at zero hour (nearly) not able to come to a consensus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svh19044 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 It's hard to get a measurement with the drifting but I got an average of around 2.6". What is the wind like there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherweather Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The met on news 12 says only9-10 inches Trenton to New Brunswick...he really slices the amounts maybe up to 16 in nj towards nyc...says this moving a jog east.....he will lose his job if New Brunswick gets 18..hero or a goat Its weird he says hes basing it off the european as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMG11 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Lol I should have saved all the nam is trash posts from yesterday Dude go look at a radar, and come back here. The NAM is verifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyblizz44 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GFS says that we have 3 inches of snow by 1 am. What a piece of **** model. I have around 3 inches now. 3.7 in Kew Gardens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherlogix Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 South shore of long island has maybe 1.5", definitely not more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfie09 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Dude go look at a radar, and come back here. The NAM is verifying. http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=DIX&product=NCR&overlay=11101111&loop=yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What is the wind like there?Nearest weather station to me (2 mi from my house) has sustained winds of 6mph and gusting to 21mph from the NE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 LATEST UPTON : (GOOD NEWS : they are riding the NAM all the way).....never thought we'd heard that huh? I would assume the 24-36" area would be expanded west soon on their map .NEAR TERM /UNTIL 6 AM TUESDAY MORNING/... 997 LOW ABOUT 200 MILES E OF THE DELMARVA AT 4 PM PER MSAS. WATERVAPOR SHOWS AN EXTENSIVE SUBTROPICAL TAP FROM THE PACIFIC TO THEWRN ATLC. THE RADAR COMPOSITE INDICATED BANDING OVER LI...WITHDEVELOPING PCPN S OF LI FLOWING NWD.THE END RESULT IS THAT CONDITIONS WILL CONTINUE TO DETERIORATE THRUTHE EARLY EVE ACROSS THE ENTIRE CWA.SNOWFALL RATES WILL PICK UP FROM AROUND 1 INCH PER HR INTO THE 2-4INCH PER HR RANGE BY 10PM OR SO. SOME LOCALLY HIGHER RATES POSSIBLEWITH CONVECTION.THE FAVORED NAM AND ECMWF SOLNS DROP THE LOW INTO THE 970SOVERNIGHT. AS THIS OCCURS...THE WINDS WILL RAPIDLY INCREASE WITHGUSTS IN EXCESS OF 40-50 MPH. ACROSS EXTREME ERN LI...WIND GUSTSUP TO 70 MPH POSSIBLE. BASED THIS ON THE NAM...IT IS POSSIBLE THATSOME EVEN LOCALLY HIGHER GUSTS ARE POSSIBLE AT THE PEAK OF THESTORM.SIGNIFICANT BLOWING AND DRIFTING OF SNOW AFT MIDNIGHT...WITHWHITEOUT CONDITIONS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 South shore of long island has maybe 1.5", definitely not more than that.Typical that it has the low end of area totals. Somehow it'll screw the pooch with the main event as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The GFS made a step there but mostly for central and eastern LI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What does everyone make of the HRRR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 NAM has more precip for NYC in 6 hours at hour 15 than the GFS does in the entire run. NAM: GFS: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemost Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Can anyone elaborate on why the short range models (hrrr/rap to be specific) are steadfast thus far in keeping the bulk of the moisture over LI/off shore/into NE? I recognize the fact that the strong dynamics seem to be having an effect. But I was wondering if someone could explain a bit more in depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 NAM has more precip for NYC in 6 hours at hour 15 than the GFS does in the entire run. NAM: 2015-01-26_16-51-14.jpg GFS: 2015-01-26_16-52-07.jpg Honestly, I'd go as far as to say that parts of the NAM run have more snow for NYC in 3 or 4 hours than the GFS does the entire run ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superstorm93 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The HRRR has consistently been hammering NE for the past 12 hours now, so I have reason to completely toss this solution at this point. While it seems nearly impossible that it verifies, it's still something that you can't simply ignore (unless there's a legitimate or technical reason). Just have to keep this in the back of your mind when thinking things through. It's just so hard to watch NJ smoke virga like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Ss93 look at that run there is no way with the depiction of that low it doesn't throw back more western moisture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superstorm93 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 995mb and 996mb The southern low seems to be the one with the most support to win out so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Ss93 look at that run there is no way with the depiction of that low it doesn't throw back more western moisture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The HRRR has consistently been hammering NE for the past 12 hours now, so I have reason to completely toss this solution at this point. While it seems nearly impossible that it verifies, it's still something that you can't simply ignore (unless there's a legitimate or technical reason) It's just so hard to watch NJ smoke virga like this. upton and mt holly know the ramifications if they bust that hard they wouldnt be putting up these numbers if they werent confident...TOSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.