LnbWx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 UKMET anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chietanen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I never say this...but at this point...with this many solutions still on the table with the event technically underway...just watch the satellite & radar & surface reports...and see how it plays out...its definitely going to snow...and a lot. Posted something very similar in the obs thread about 20 minutes ago. Totally agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 1/27 12Z Summary NYC QPF (Snow) SREF: 1.50 - 1.75 (>18") NAM: 2.25 - 2.50 (>30") RGEM: 1.00 - 1.15 (>13") GFS: 0.70 - 0.95 (>11") GEFS: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleetStormNJ Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Assuming the RGEM is correct, we would have a major snowstorm at hand, however, not an epic storm that the euro/nam shows. If the euro backs down, it's not game over.....but just would make more sense to not have the "maybe 2-3 feet?" thoughts in our mind.....they're unhealthy thoughts to have RGEM is probably going to struggle with the banding features. Also the GFS seems to always fudge the NW precip shield. It failed horribly this past weekend at times. I think a blended approach still yields 12-20 for most. Who gets the jackpots is really the thing that the models won't catch onto until the last minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjr231 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Ok, but I would have average in QPF on the GFS when it looks to be flat out wrong with the trough depiction. I totally agree. I guess my point is that even the worst case scenario at this point isnt bad at all, likely or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 VERY overdone as strong winds should fracture the pretty dendrites and hold snow ratios down. Still...3+" QPF is astounding, and I am confident someone will get 3 feet of snow out of this where the heaviest bands set up. Could be anywhere in NYC metro, CT, or Long Island...I'd expect at least 18-24" and prepare for worst case of 3 feet if I lived in those areas, which of course I do Bill, thanks! Love having you pop in and give your insights to us. Assuming you are still tossing the GFS solution (for now). Seems as though it struggled to initialize well (not picking up on neutral - about to go negative tilt - trough). I'm fine with 18" on the lower end, suspect that might be low for about 1/2 of us in the area. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I totally agree. I guess my point is that even the worst case scenario at this point isnt bad at all, likely or not. oh yea you are absolutely correct if that's what you meant... a foot plus is nothing to sneeze about but it would definitely not be the historic blizzard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 well the RGEM goes from 8-10" for NENJ to 2-3" for NW NJ sussex county That's awsome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdt Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 well the RGEM goes from 8-10" for NENJ to 2-3" for NW NJ sussex county My wife says we already have 2" maybe a touch more at home. Guess We are just about rapped up. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 ggem is similiar to gfs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 VERY overdone as strong winds should fracture the pretty dendrites and hold snow ratios down. Still...3+" QPF is astounding, and I am confident someone will get 3 feet of snow out of this where the heaviest bands set up. Could be anywhere in NYC metro, CT, or Long Island...I'd expect at least 18-24" and prepare for worst case of 3 feet if I lived in those areas, which of course I do The only time similar numbers were reached in this general area that I can recall was in 1978 when they came to about 50 inches reputedly in NW Rhode Island near Foster (elevation about 600')...and then in 2005...when I think some spots pushed 40" in coastal Massachusetts...oh, and snow event two Februaries ago when southern CT tipped 40". Of course, the Blizzard of 1888 saw about 47" in New Haven... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The only time similar numbers were reached in this general area that I can recall was in 1978 when they came to about 50 inches reputedly in NW Rhode Island near Foster (elevation about 600')...and then in 2005...when I think some spots pushed 40" in coastal Massachusetts...oh, and snow event two Februaries ago when southern CT tipped 40". Of course, the Blizzard of 1888 saw about 47" in New Haven... That December 1992 storm pushed 48 inches in the Berkshires around Peru (elev 2000') (aptly named due to its high altitude)...but I would not include that as it was elevation driven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 ggem is similiar to gfs This is the most frustrating storm to track I can ever remember. The event is underway and we're still worlds apart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForestHillWx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Not sure if this is the correct thread, but if you look at the water vapor loop, to me it appears the trough is tilting somewhere off the coast of southern North Carolina. Also the feature diving down through northern Georgia looks great. To me this screams explosive storm that will follow the Euro's idea. Can't wait for the show to begin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 This is the most frustrating storm to track I can ever remember. The event is underway and we're still worlds apart. The other Jan. 26 was the same. 2011. GFS constantly showed .50"-.75" of precip, even on the 12z run on the same day. 16"-22" fell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 H5 looks good on the ggem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The other Jan. 26 was the same. 2011. GFS constantly showed .50"-.75" of precip, even on the 12z run on the same day. 16"-22" fell. Alex what does the ggem have for qpf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeysed Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Do we have confirmation this thing is negative yet?If so, what are we looking at as agreement... is it right on schedule to (Euro or Nam), is it ahead of schedule, delayed compared to one of them, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The other Jan. 26 was the same. 2011. GFS constantly showed .50"-.75" of precip, even on the 12z run on the same day. 16"-22" fell. Feb 2013 was similar-GFS predicted 12 inches out here and we got 30 similar to what euro showed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveWinter Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 This is the most frustrating storm to track I can ever remember. The event is underway and we're still worlds apart. I agree, you would think they would have this sorted by now. Not a met but I just think the dynamics are just so off the charts that the models are having difficulties (euro and nam perhaps included too) sorting everything out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I guess we'll just see what happens then all ingredients are coming together. The water vapor loop is becoming very impressive though. The Euro will likely tug east to match the other models but maybe not by a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Alex what does the ggem have for qpf .75"-1" line is right on NYC. 1"+ line starts in Suffolk County. .50" line is by EWR. Rest of NJ is .25"-.50". PA is under .25". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kborne Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I never say this...but at this point...with this many solutions still on the table with the event technically underway...just watch the satellite & radar & surface reports...and see how it plays out...its definitely going to snow...and a lot. Thanks for this post. This was my thinking. I lurk here (as you can see). But I 'cringe' when I hear 'nowcasting' on t.v. because all my friends say the same thing: 'my 10 year old can nowcast'. Anyway, at this point the system is in transition off the coast, there is a lot to be gained at this point by looking at the surface reports and the soundings as the low progresses, and as you said - sat and rad...etc. This is when I like to jump in and start looking at the raw numbers, and get back to the old fashioned way of forecasting. I could get into the models, but I won't here, this isn't the thread. I know how the models are set up and how they are weighted (7 days out and 24 hours out, and I am not a fan...) Anyway, this post, by you, is what I think we all need to key in on at this point in the life of this somewhat complex system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 .75"-1" line is right on NYC. 1"+ line starts in Suffolk County. .50" line is by EWR. Rest of NJ is .25"-.50". PA is under .25". Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I just don't buy that such a deepening system aloft would have so little west of the track. Maybe this time it'll be right, who knows. NWS was wise to go with 18-24" for the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/mesoanalysis/new/viewsector.php?sector=19&parm=500mb# Do we have confirmation this thing is negative yet? If so, what are we looking at as agreement... is it right on schedule to (Euro or Nam), is it ahead of schedule, delayed compared to one of them, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjr231 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Eh, the RGEM is more trustworthy than the GGEM at this point. I think its still not expanding the precip on the northwest side enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Thanks No problem Tim. I think the Ukmet is in the GFS/GGEM camp as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Going negative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 No problem Tim. I think the Ukmet is in the GFS/GGEM camp as well. Yeah looking at the Euro from last night it just seems it has more preciep on the nw side of the storm....track is similar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.