Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I've always seen the RGEM as accurate which definitely has me worried.....and the NAM is obviously being loved at the moment because it shows a ton of snow and goes along with the last euro run.....have you noticed anything on the RGEM a that seemed "off"? It definitely is usually more accurate than the NAM, especially at this range tbh the rgem looks like its suffering with convective feedback and not enough of a western precip shield...track isnt bad at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zir0b Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 But doesn't the NAM always overdo QPF? Sometimes quite significantly? QPF axis is pretty much in line with the Euro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleetStormNJ Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I've always seen the RGEM as accurate which definitely has me worried.....and the NAM is obviously being loved at the moment because it shows a ton of snow and goes along with the last euro run.....have you noticed anything on the RGEM a that seemed "off"? It definitely is usually more accurate than the NAM, especially at this range RGEM looks pretty good for those of us in N/E NJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 apparently per accuweather u can already see the trough going negative and the gfs didnt show this to 1 or 2 pm...gfs=toss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The Euro has been extremely steady and I don't think it'll go more than a tick east. The range is too close and it's been consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I've always seen the RGEM as accurate which definitely has me worried.....and the NAM is obviously being loved at the moment because it shows a ton of snow and goes along with the last euro run.....have you noticed anything on the RGEM a that seemed "off"? It definitely is usually more accurate than the NAM, especially at this range The positive sign from the RGEM was it did come west, it's a good sign to see it didn't go east or remain the same, it appeared to give close to 18 in NYC and easily 18-26 over LI, the nam and euro though I'm becoming increasingly confident are likely over done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The RAP's forecast at the end of it's run would suggest the GFS and RGEM are closer to reality than the NAM or Euro, the RAP has a known west bias beyond 12 hours and it's barely getting heavy snow to NYC, the Euro may be going down on this event. You're going to trust the RAP at the end of its run over the Euro? Good luck. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Having the RGEM on the east side of things really concerns me. The only thing saving the NAM right now is the fact that the Euro is very similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjr231 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I wont lie. The GFS not biting doesnt worry me at all, but not having the RGEM on board gives me an uneasy feeling. It has often done better than even the EURO in the 24 hour range for some events the last few winters. I have fully been behind the EURO for days now and its extreme solution and not wavered but the RGEM is now giving me some pause. That being said even the GFS/RGEM scenario of 12-16 inches in the city I will glady take to the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blizzardo Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Well... In 24 hours, we will know who the real king is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Having the RGEM on the east side of things really concerns me. The only thing saving the NAM right now is the fact that the Euro is very similar. Rgem is 15"-18" for NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 You're going to trust the RAP at the end of its run over the Euro? Good luck. Sent from my iPhone It almost always has a west bias at that range, it's possible it could be out to lunch but you'd want to see it with snow back into eastern PA at hour 18 right now most of the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snywx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Rgem is 15"-18" for NYC. My concern isn't for NYC. It for those on the western side of things. Should have clarified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Rgem is 15"-18" for NYC. Which is about right down the middle of Euro/GFS. I'd take RGEM to the bank and deposit it if I could.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 It almost always has a west bias at that range, it's possible it could be out to lunch but you'd want to see it with snow back into eastern PA at hour 18 right now most of the time RAP is not capable of picking up on this complicated phasing. It will be useless to use until the storm is fully formed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Assuming the RGEM is correct, we would have a major snowstorm at hand, however, not an epic storm that the euro/nam shows. If the euro backs down, it's not game over.....but just would make more sense to not have the "maybe 2-3 feet?" thoughts in our mind.....they're unhealthy thoughts to have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The RAP's forecast at the end of it's run would suggest the GFS and RGEM are closer to reality than the NAM or Euro, the RAP has a known west bias beyond 12 hours and it's barely getting heavy snow to NYC, the Euro may be going down on this event. Just curious, if the RGEM shows 50% more snow than the GFS, why are we putting them in the same camp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayson Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 My concern isn't for NYC. It for those on the western side of things. Should have clarified How far west? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I wont lie. The GFS not biting doesnt worry me at all, but not having the RGEM on board gives me an uneasy feeling. It has often done better than even the EURO in the 24 hour range for some events the last few winters. I have fully been behind the EURO for days now and its extreme solution and not wavered but the RGEM is now giving me some pause. That being said even the GFS/RGEM scenario of 12-16 inches in the city I will glady take to the bank. Not really sure what your talking about but the RGEM gives the NYC area close to 18 inches.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I never say this...but at this point...with this many solutions still on the table with the event technically underway...just watch the satellite & radar & surface reports...and see how it plays out...its definitely going to snow...and a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I never say this...but at this point...with this many solutions still on the table with the event technically underway...just watch the satellite & radar & surface reports...and see how it plays out... Yes your options are you get 20 or 30 . Those are GREAT options Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zir0b Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 It almost always has a west bias at that range, it's possible it could be out to lunch but you'd want to see it with snow back into eastern PA at hour 18 right now most of the time With all due respect I think the RAP's bias only occurs during WAA events/SWFE/simple coastal lows, I wouldn't use it in a situation like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Ant how did the ensembles look compared to the operations? I missed it. Similiar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Rgem is 15"-18" for NYC. wow. That's amazing...even the eastern camp has a major hit NYC and east. Blend the 2 camps for now IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I never say this...but at this point...with this many solutions still on the table with the event technically underway...just watch the satellite & radar & surface reports...and see how it plays out...its definitely going to snow...and a lot. Yes and the trough is already negative which the GFS didn't have until 1pm ... which right there makes it null and void Nothing has changed for this forecast... 1-2 feet of snow for the area seems like the best call at this time with spots getting more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 How far west?well the RGEM goes from 8-10" for NENJ to 2-3" for NW NJ sussex county Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjr231 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Not really sure what your talking about but the RGEM gives the NYC area close to 18 inches.... I was averaging the GFS and RGEM totals since neither of them show the extreme solution of the EURO or NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billgwx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Kuchera method via the 12Z NAM really is interesting. Likely overdone , but good eye candy! VERY overdone as strong winds should fracture the pretty dendrites and hold snow ratios down. Still...3+" QPF is astounding, and I am confident someone will get 3 feet of snow out of this where the heaviest bands set up. Could be anywhere in NYC metro, CT, or Long Island...I'd expect at least 18-24" and prepare for worst case of 3 feet if I lived in those areas, which of course I do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgame830 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I was averaging the GFS and RGEM totals since neither of them show the extreme solution of the EURO or NAM. Ok, but I would have average in QPF on the GFS when it looks to be flat out wrong with the trough depiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 VERY overdone as strong winds should fracture the pretty dendrites and hold snow ratios down. Still...3+" QPF is astounding, and I am confident someone will get 3 feet of snow out of this where the heaviest bands set up. Could be anywhere in NYC metro, CT, or Long Island...I'd expect at least 18-24" and prepare for worst case of 3 feet if I lived in those areas, which of course I do Thanks, Bill! I'm riding you through this storm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.