Neblizzard Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 If the Euro was 1st with this , the SREFs were 2 . I agree with the sticky .( Warning adjust NW ) . There is a day 8 storm , next week on the maps . Looks like 66 . There is a Strong southern system that may run from OBX to CC . With the BL in the single digits . So if that happens , we will back here throwing knives again , you can count on it . If that comes out and up . You're an excellent poster on here, some of the stuff you write just makes me laugh. "Throwing knives again" lol. Massive changes overnight make me think the 12z suite will be a cave to the euro. It's not going to be wrong 12-24 hours before this event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Just a quick question from the UK. 1) Do we have any live stream TV forecast stations covering the event constantly? TWC for example..but local. Not yet but I'm sure a number of the local stations will have this constant coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveWinter Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Just a quick question from the UK. 1) Do we have any live stream TV forecast stations covering the event constantly? TWC for example..but local. I am sure most of the news stations will but not till tonight. Also, there are multiple webcams (espec Times Square) all over the city for live shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I high five myself here all the time , No shame in that ha . Nice work . Thanks. I know my fundamental sciences (PhD in chem eng'g) very well, which is why I tend to post about things like snow crystal microphysics, mass/heat transfer/dynamic cooling, phase changes and the like. But my meteorology knowledge is somewhat limited, as I've never had any courses/training in synoptics or model reading - however, I do a ton of risk analysis/risk mgmt work and what the NWS did with the more conservative 4 am packages was textbook risk management. They were very confident in the Euro, but had other data they couldn't completely discount, so they compromised a bit, but went nowhere near as low as they could have if they had - gasp! - discounted the Euro. Kudos to them, as the 6Z suite is vindicating their logic. By the way, kudos to you and Don for the excellent discussion on this page - I learn a lot from both of you and quite a few other on the forum. Makes it worth wading through all the panic, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 It's remarkable that we can do it on the Euro going from a fish to a KU blizzard in just 24 hrs time. I guess the motto here in the 2000's is to expect the unexpected weather event extremes. The GFS had this last Thursday . I posted EWALL maps for 2 days . And I was so against buying it because the Euro did not see it . That's what I mean about the GFS it sees it , then loses it , then has to get there kicking and screaming . But it had it 1st . However once the Euro got it , it did not move for 2 days . The difference was the other models were not handling the N Atlantic correctly as well as the speed of the backside SW . Once the euro saw the capture and retrogression it held it . That solution is done . I cant wait to see the eye on the satellite shot in the AM . Then I am on to day 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minerva Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Thanks. I know my fundamental sciences (PhD in chem eng'g) very well, which is why I tend to post about things like snow crystal microphysics, mass/heat transfer/dynamic cooling, phase changes and the like. But my meteorology knowledge is somewhat limited, as I've never had any courses/training in synoptics or model reading - however, I do a ton of risk analysis/risk mgmt work and what the NWS did with the more conservative 4 am packages was textbook risk management. They were very confident in the Euro, but had other data they couldn't completely discount, so they compromised a bit, but went nowhere near as low as they could have if they had - gasp! - discounted the Euro. Kudos to them, as the 6Z suite is vindicating their logic. By the way, kudos to you and Don for the excellent discussion on this page - I learn a lot from both of you and quite a few other on the forum. Makes it worth wading through all the panic, lol. We lurkers especially appreciate learned people of all stripes. Thank you for your valuable input! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The GFS had this last Thursday . I posted EWALL maps for 2 days . And I was so against buying it because the Euro did not see it . That's what I mean about the GFS it sees it , then loses it , then has to get there kicking and screaming . But it had it 1st . However once the Euro got it , it did not move for 2 days . The difference was the other models were not handling the N Atlantic correctly as well as the speed of the backside SW . Once the euro saw the capture and retrogression it held it . That solution is done . I cant wait to see the eye on the satellite shot in the AM . Then I am on to day 8 It's also interesting how the Saturday storm corrected north on such short notice around days 5-6 but in a less dramatic manner. Some lucky spots are going to JP big time tonight and tomorrow where the band stalls in place as the low sits on the benchmark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooralph Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Thanks. I know my fundamental sciences (PhD in chem eng'g) very well, which is why I tend to post about things like snow crystal microphysics, mass/heat transfer/dynamic cooling, phase changes and the like. But my meteorology knowledge is somewhat limited, as I've never had any courses/training in synoptics or model reading - however, I do a ton of risk analysis/risk mgmt work and what the NWS did with the more conservative 4 am packages was textbook risk management. They were very confident in the Euro, but had other data they couldn't completely discount, so they compromised a bit, but went nowhere near as low as they could have if they had - gasp! - discounted the Euro. Kudos to them, as the 6Z suite is vindicating their logic. By the way, kudos to you and Don for the excellent discussion on this page - I learn a lot from both of you and quite a few other on the forum. Makes it worth wading through all the panic, lol. It is a good forecast - yours and theirs. Question is - why so high to begin with? There was model support for 24-36", but there was only room to go down from there. I posted that to FB, so I'll pat myself on the back 18-24"+ is enough to: convey, historic, disruptive storm. If there are 30"+ stripes, the impact to transportation and life is not that much greater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Hey guys lookout for the elderly neighnbors, first responders are helpless in these situations stay well enjoy the snowgasm.see ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 It is a good forecast - yours and theirs. Question is - why so high to begin with? There was model support for 24-36", but there was only room to go down from there. I posted that to FB, so I'll pat myself on the back 18-24"+ is enough to: convey, historic, disruptive storm. If there are 30"+ stripes, the impact to transportation and life is not that much greater. The actual forecast was for 24-30", as explained by the NWS met who hopped on here for a few posts. The map graphic required them to go to 24-36". I agree with the hedge down but the original forecast may very well work out fine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sferic Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The actual forecast was for 24-30", as explained by the NWS met who hopped on here for a few posts. The map graphic required them to go to 24-36". I agree with the hedge down but the original forecast may very well work out fine. Sent from my iPhone What did he mean the map graphic required them to go from 24-36? As opposed to what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU4Real Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Hey guys lookout for the elderly neighnbors, first responders are helpless in these situations stay well enjoy the snowgasm.see ya It's off-topic and I apologize, but this isn't true. Here in Monmouth County the FDs and EMS agencies pin crews to the house for all weather emergencies ("snow stand-by") and while response times can be reduced due to road conditions we absolutely will get out to the calls. But yeah - check on the neighbors. That's always a good thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob1 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What did he mean the map graphic required them to go from 24-36? As opposed to what?They have either 18-24 or 24-36, they would've gone 22-28 probably or something like that if that was an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikemost Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What did he mean the map graphic required them to go from 24-36? As opposed to what? It sounded to me as if he was indicating that the 24-36" graphic was a "stock" graphic to choose from. IMHO, anyway... Although the actual forecast called for 24-30" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stlirish Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 What did he mean the map graphic required them to go from 24-36? As opposed to what? He had up to 30" in his forecast and that was the graphic that covered that range. They were also coordinating graphics with the other offices. Regardless, he said HIS forecast was 24-30" using 12/1 ratios and following EURO/NAM blend for guidance. Completely disregarded GFS. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 You're an excellent poster on here, some of the stuff you write just makes me laugh. "Throwing knives again" lol. Massive changes overnight make me think the 12z suite will be a cave to the euro. It's not going to be wrong 12-24 hours before this event. Thank you , Convection and it`s lift may help to increase QPF and raito`s that the meso s will pick up later NEW YORK (MANHATTAN)- 735 AM EST MON JAN 26 2015 ...BLIZZARD WARNING IN EFFECT FROM 1 PM THIS AFTERNOON TO MIDNIGHT EST TUESDAY NIGHT... .TODAY...LIGHT SNOW. SNOW ACCUMULATION OF 1 TO 3 INCHES. HIGHS IN THE UPPER 20S. NORTHEAST WINDS 15 TO 20 MPH. CHANCE OF SNOW NEAR 100 PERCENT. .TONIGHT...SNOW IN THE EVENING...THEN SNOW WITH A CHANCE OF THUNDERSTORMS AFTER MIDNIGHT. BLOWING SNOW. SNOW MAY BE HEAVY AT TIMES AFTER MIDNIGHT WITH VISIBILITY ONE QUARTER MILE OR LESS AT TIMES. ADDITIONAL SNOW ACCUMULATION OF 8 TO 12 INCHES. WINDY WITH LOWS IN THE LOWER 20S. NORTH WINDS 20 TO 25 MPH WITH GUSTS UP TO 35 MPH. CHANCE OF SNOW NEAR 100 PERCENT. .TUESDAY...SNOW WITH A CHANCE OF THUNDERSTORMS IN THE MORNING...THEN SNOW IN THE AFTERNOON. BLOWING SNOW. SNOW MAY BE HEAVY AT TIMES IN THE MORNING WITH VISIBILITY ONE QUARTER MILE OR LESS AT TIMES. ADDITIONAL SNOW ACCUMULATION OF 6 TO 10 INCHES. BLUSTERY AND COLD. NEAR STEADY TEMPERATURE IN THE MID 20S. NORTH WINDS AROUND 20 MPH WITH GUSTS UP TO 35 MPH. CHANCE OF SNOW NEAR 100 PERCENT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Even 6 hours ago I was like... These things are damn hard to figure... I was pretty confident at 0z that the light to mod snow over NYC depiction and a closing off 500mb low were completely unrealistic and the models were favoring the heavy convection too much. Looks like that was the right call. There should be tons of snow into NYC and maybe into NJ as well with the upper level depiction as it is. 18-24" is probably the right call for the NYC area with 24"+ east of the Sagtikos. And if the Euro/RGEM are right, 24"+ into NYC. The Euro totally nails NYC with that deformation banding, and the NW edge of the heavy QPF is known to contain the best banding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 You really don't want to be just to the NW of wherever that mega band sets up. Strong dynamic bands like this one is projected to be have strong subsidence on either side. Strong lift focused on one location tends to cause sinking air around it. 90% of the people that live in this sub-forum should be fine but don't be surprised if this is a general 12-18" in most places with narrow bands of 30"+ where the best banding setup. I think Boxing Day is probably a very good analog in terms of where the sharp cut off will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 How were the sref's ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 SREF KNYC 1.5 to 1 75 Nassau Suffolk border 1.75 to 2 on east. The western side ramps down but while we on the coast go 12 to 1 where the winds are the strongest Just west of the city ratios should be 15 to 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swamplover56 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I'm heading to Hoboken at noon to ride out the storm with friends feel that's about as good of a spot as I can be in in nj. Thanks pbi your a great asset to to the board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The 09z SREF ticked East. The 1"+ contour now runs from SWF to MMU to to TTN 03z the 1"+ contour ran from Sullivan County to just NW of Philly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 12z NAM is running. I'll be here all day to give the latest model PBP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 The 09z SREF ticked East. The 1"+ contour now runs from SWF to MMU to to TTN 03z the 1"+ contour ran from Sullivan County to just NW of Philly Not that impressive for the interior. We can get these type of totals for regular storms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Band works right in off the ocean and nails the area. This is probably the area that's currently over SNJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 If the NAM verifies, may people will be over 6" by tonight on the coast. Some areas are already over 0.50"+ liquid by 00z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANDA Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 You really don't want to be just to the NW of wherever that mega band sets up. Strong dynamic bands like this one is projected to be have strong subsidence on either side. Strong lift focused on one location tends to cause sinking air around it. 90% of the people that live in this sub-forum should be fine but don't be surprised if this is a general 12-18" in most places with narrow bands of 30"+ where the best banding setup. I think Boxing Day is probably a very good analog in terms of where the sharp cut off will be. No you really don't want to be west or northwest of where best banding sets up. Boxing day is a good example for sure. This will likely not be as extreme as that was, at least closer into NYC metro. Will likely be over western 1/3 of NJ or just over the border before amounts start to quickly fall off. I had 14" here in southern Morris County and less than 10 miles away amounts were 25-30" over ALL of Union County. Was painful to watch the band(s) on radar just sit there and never make it over the county line into Morris. The sinking kept totals to the west and southwest of me in the single digits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY-LES FREAK Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I do not think the 50 mm isohyet is that far west. Isopleth?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 This run is significantly further NW and wet for today than 06z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Please refrain from making a lot of posts while the models are running, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.