BxEngine Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Every post here since the end of the gfs run belongs in banter. Can we hold it together a few more hours people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMG11 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 2z RAP http://forums.accuweather.com/uploads/post-26143-1422245947_thumb.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wxoutlooksblog Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I think we all have no idea how the NEW GFS will handle a situation like this. We have no clues to its ability. Rossi The new GFS is a terrible model, almost as bad as the NAM. WX/PT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNY-LES FREAK Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Is it already snowing in NYC? Wouldn't that be several hours ahead of the official forecast start time? Its Not snowing anywhere near the city so I don't know what your talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Haha well how do you think this would compare with that ? I have NEVER seen such obscene amounts (24-36") forecast for my area, not then or any other time. Considering I wasn't looking at models yet in 2001, I only had the TV and Radio to go by and they were still calling for an historic storm as the snow starting falling Sunday afternoon. Also, 2000-01 came after 4 years that TOTALED 44.5" of snow. We got 35" that winter, but that storm would have put us over 50" and would have been a big deal. If the Euro bails tonight, at least it was 24 hours before the real snow was set to move in. It will be a bitter disappointment, but wouldn't compare personally to 3/5/01. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LnbWx Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I think media & politicians should give the mets at Upton (& generally NWS) a break. Heads would have rolled if they had forecasted conservatively and it ended up historic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Every post here since the end of the gfs run belongs in banter. Can we hold it together a few more hours people? Stop being the voice of reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I think media & politicians should give the mets at Upton (& generally NWS) a break. Heads would have rolled if they had forecasted conservatively and it ended up historic. There would've still been time tomorrow to ramp amounts up if needed. Tomorrow during the day should be fairly low impact. I've never seen a forecast above 24" from the NWS in my life probably. There must have been huge confidence to release a prediction that high. If the Euro significantly cuts back tonight, Upton and Mt. Holly are going to have to backtrack big time. 10" or a foot is still high impact but not a historic blizzard by any means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisnow66 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 So PT, do you believe the Euro will hold and that we should throw out NAM and GFS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeRain Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 If the Euro holds and turns out correct it'll live in infamy as untouchable but it makes a huge shift then that's a epic fail. Given subsidence usually present to the west of strong bands if the gfs is right we might end up with very little making this storm a contender for biggest bust in our history. Yes, it's either a big snow for NYC or a big bust for the Euro. Couldn't ask for more drama for tonights run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lisnow66 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Storm really isn't moving as fast as people are saying it is... Euro will hold serve IMO 24-30" amounts will be determined where the banding sets up Wish some of the better METS would chime in. So many are saying clipper moving too fast. Doesn't appear it really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Yes, it's either a big snow for NYC or a big bust for the Euro. Couldn't ask for more drama for tonights run. All of the models still give NYC a "big snow", but 10-12" and 2 feet have much different levels of impact. One is a big headache for a day but manageable, the other shuts down towns for days and closes major interstates/airports/transit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GGEM? looks about 0.80 - 1.0 more east so >11" snow-wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GGEM?Same as the others, its following the convection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherweather Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 I have a legitimate question. What is about the euro exactly that would make it superior over mesoscale models such as the NAM or RGEM in a short range forecast? Arent those models developed specifically for sub 48 hour forecasts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GGEM? GGEM is also east but it has been.. So please other readers do not mistake this as a trend lol.. It's been east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossi Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Its Not snowing anywhere near the city so I don't know what your talking about? It's snowing in Monmouth cty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BL03 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Having the EURO being so consistent in the last 3 runs and being the first to see this sat am is a big deal still. This is a very unique set-up and not something I think I've ever really seen, it really does look like feb 78. That being said the 00z GFS looked to be to bring things slightly west in the upper air (5h) but surface isn't really matching. It may really be a case of the models not knowing how to handle this situation... and if the euro holds AGAIN then maybe that means the euro is the only model that is able to handle it and be consistent. I need sleep.... this is draining. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GGEM is also east but it has been.. So please other readers do not mistake this as a trend lol.. It's been east That is the problem. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherfreeeeak Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 How was the UKMET? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UlsterCountySnowZ Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 That is the problem. Lol This happens very often...why is everyone so surprised..how many times has the euro scored a coupe? On an ECS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 No one knows what is going to happen yet...not for at least another 48 hours...but not always the best thing to throw out 24 - 36 inch widespread amounts before the onset of one of these events...simply because it is extremely rare. The day before the Great Blizzard of '78...the NYC forecasters predicted "a foot or more"...while the Boston NWS went with "8 to 16 inches"...Boston obviously went rather low...as Logan got about 27 inches...much of Long Island saw similar totals...how much *really* fell in NYC will remain a mystery...despite the admission of some questionable totals from LGA, JFK, & CPK into the record books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwcMan Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GFS/NAM are waffling too much for me to take it seriously right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 1/26 00Z Summary NYC : QPF (snowfall) SREF: 1.10 - 1.40 (>18") NAM: 0.85 - 1.15 (>12") REM: 0.81 - 1.05 (>11") GFS: 0.60 - 0.85 : (>7) GGEM: 0.85 - 1.05 (>11") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 That is the problem. Lol The Euro has been further west and stronger than the other models for the past several runs along with the ensembles. The other models didn't really move east at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nygmen Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 GGEM is also east but it has been.. So please other readers do not mistake this as a trend lol.. It's been east its further east and weaker than 12z...its a trend bro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveWinter Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Any word on the UKIE? It was kind of in the Euro's camp earlier today, would be interesting to see if it still is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Last post since I'm still 5 posted for years lol but GGEM is solid 10+ still so Sref & GGEM on board so far kinda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMG11 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 We have to assume the pro mets putting out these snow maps and bolder forecasts are putting their brains to work a bit. I don't believe they are living and dying by the euro - we can all do that. Lets give upton the benefit of the doubt for the time being and see what the Euro shows once more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yhbrooklyn Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 No one knows what is going to happen yet...not for at least another 48 hours...but not always the best thing to throw out 24 - 36 inch widespread amounts before the onset of one of these events...simply because it is extremely rare. The day before the Great Blizzard of '78...the NYC forecasters predicted "a foot or more"...while the Boston NWS went with "8 to 16 inches"...Boston obviously went rather low...as Logan got about 27 inches...much of Long Island saw similar totals...how much *really* fell in NYC will remain a mystery...despite the admission of some questionable totals from LGA, JFK, & CPK into the record books. I'm guessing that NWS was tired of criticism that they are always playing catch up on big ticket events. You will always see the maps ramp up from 6-10 to 10-14 and then while the event is underway, jump to 12-24, etc. They saw the Euro and the tons of support it had and decided to warn the public and jump at the high totals from the get go. It's not a terrible strategy because even if you bust "low" at 20", no one would really criticize it. But now the Euro's support has been creeping downwards... Only an hour left of agony, but even if he Euro holds serve, I don't know what it means at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.